Striking similarity between Joe Biden and Joe McCarthy

The Biden DOJ is enforcing selective and alleged law violations, er, pre-approved law violations while other law violations (like border laws) are ignored by the Biden DOJ and Homeland Security.

 

Not true. There is vigorous enforcement of border violations despite right wing media claims to the contrary. So far you are striking out badly when it comes to making factually supported statements.

 

Dude, the DOJ is literally part of the president's cabinet. Figure it out, just once.

 

Sure they can. They do it all the time. The government, whether local, state, or federal, don't attack children. If the child breaks the law and they are under 16, the parents must be called, period.

 

Ignorant of facts.

 

No they can't. If parents disagree, for example, they're labelled terrorists.

 

LGBTQ is more than psychology here. It is biology, psychology, sociology, and political. The LGBTQ today is the blacks of the 1950s and 60s, the Chinese in the 1850s, the Japanese in the 1940s, and so forth. But the point is that we are repeating history.

To give you an example, when Charles Shultz introduced Franklin in his comic strip, the Penuts, and sitting with Perpiment patti in the early 1970s, that was highly controversial because it dealt with desegregation. Nowadays, desegregation is viewed more as history than anything else even though there are parents who will try to use "school choice" to make sure their children are not with "those children." DO you understand now?

 

The DOJ has separation from the Presidency. And the current charges aren't being brought from the DOJ.

 

No. If parents resort to death threats and other threats of violence, they are labelled terrorists. Why are you upset that people would be labelled terrorists when they resort to threats of politically motivated threats of violence?

 

Resisting demands is not resisting arrest. And he did nothing wrong . . . unlike the murderer who killed him. But it is very, very telling to hear you resort to such authoritarian justification for this murder.

 

You have said that you were a Republican who was chased out of the party. When I read responses like this, I wonder if you were only "joshing me."

There serious ethical questions about BLM and what its leadership has done with the money it collected.

And yes, I resent having people tell me what pronouns to use. It is part of the control aspect of the Democrat Party which is becoming very concerning. This pronoun stuff has to do with the sub-cultures of people who are sexually different. Straight people are under no obligation to to conform to their culture. Straight people are certainly under no obligation to stop using using words like "father, mother, man or woman." If LBGQ can't deal with that, it's too bad. Why do they have the right to dictate to other people? They don't.

 

I wont think it's right if people start chanting "lock him up", but the right really has no room to complain if they did not complain then - but I would expect Biden not to be promoting it like Trump did

 

As I said, your misunderstanding about the independence of the DoJ can be excused in the wake of Trump's abuses. So you need to educate yourself. https://www.lawfareblog.com/independence-and-accountability-department-justice

 

So you are inferring it (aka your opinion)

I wonder where you were when your man was repeating the only good democrat is a dead one?

 

I surely feel that if morality is a question we do need to protect children. Children have computers. Children know how to use computers. There are things on the internet much more damaging than what one can find in a schoolroom or at a library. Why no concern there? I think the morality police should look into that.

I also think that if protecting children is our goal we should look into protecting them in our schools.

The Constitution also doesn't have an "except for" clause in the first amendment

 

You can't be serious. Usually, you guys call him a senile old fool. Now he's an oppressive attack dog? Give me a break.

 

Here is a propoal now passing through the Florida legislature with the urging of Governor:

“legislation that would sharply curb press freedom in Florida is creating a rare rift between the governor and the media that have helped propel his rise.
The legislation being considered in Tallahassee seeks to challenge the long-standing Supreme Court precedent known as New York Times v. Sullivan — which protects publishers of all sorts from defamation suits unless an error is found to be willful or the result of negligence. The legislation would also eliminate several protections for journalists in Florida, narrow the definition of a public figure, and establish the presumption that any statement from an anonymous source, including whistleblowers, is automatically deemed false.”

Isn’t this a prime example of denying free speech?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/wing-media-splits-desantis-press-121040759.html

 

LGBTQ is psychological. Period. I don't think it's necessary to give advantages to fans of the Armadale football club, for example, over fans of the Ballajura football club, either.

 

The head of the DOJ, Garland, is a Biden Administration appointee and a NY state prosecutor is trying to criminalize Trump using federal election laws...When has a state prosecutor ever been able (until yesterday) to prosecute federal statutes?

 

No. Parents who don't agree with the ideology of city council representatives are labelled as terrorists by the DOJ and FBI.

 

When a possible criminal resists police demands, an arrest is soon coming.

 

Still haven't answered the question. Why do you think it was wrong for people to chant lock her up OK for people to shout these NY criminality invectives at Trump?

 

im sorry but despite the RWs constant attempts to align the left with fascism, those of us that have read real books know better, but you did make me laugh

 

The head of the DOJ, Garland, is a Biden Administration appointee.

 

The Biden Administration is doing it w/o saying it.