Supreme Court Allows Illinois Assault Weapons Ban To Take Effect

that would make a great tag line!

 

I believe cutting the core issue, which is not guns, would definitely be a good public safety objective.

 

What does that mean?

Are you suggesting we work on public safety UNLESS people got shot dead?

 

that's bullshit because you gun banners are going after weapons responsible for statistically insignificant number of deaths while not going after handguns, knives and clubs-all of which are used in more murders

 

This is just your lack of understanding of what has been done.

Restrictions on pistols HAS been attempted.

The problem is that the SC rejects public safety as a justification for these attempts to reduce gun murder.

Once again, do you accept that public safety is a legitimate objective?

 

nothing you all proposed is even remotely related to public safety

 

can you imagine what someone with a samurai sword could do in a schoolroom of kids?
The mess that would make s unthinkable

 

I am actually rather familiar with those weapons-having both a mike bell and a howard clark Katana. Those who are into this weapon will recognize those two smiths as perhaps the finest in the world. I also count as a close friend, one of the greatest female Tameshigiri competitors (long retired) going. and yeah a big strong young man with a katana would have killed those kids almost as quickly as Lanza did with the rifle he took from his murdered mother.

 

Emphasis mine. You being able to say this means you actually read something.

even though you hold an incorrect opinion.

 

Of course it does. I thought that was understood?

 

No, I'm being perfectly serious.

Its the same sentence form. I just used "books" instead of "guns".
Now tell me: Who may keep and bear books?
For bonus points: What restrictions may be placed on this right to keep and bear books?

 

Perhaps a 10 day waiting period and a 10 page limit will keep us safe!

 

Semi-automatic assault weapons don’t exist.

 

Yep. That's how come I carry a sword.

 

The term "assualt rife" is often used by the ignorant as a catch-all phrase to describe modern firearms. If you put a M-16 next to a Star Wars movie prop lazer gun, the movie prop is scarier looking and is therefore an
assualt rifle despite the fact that it is inert.

 

your premise is bogus.
guns dont kill people
people kill people
you need to get your priorities in order before you start demanding legislation.

If the problem is the people, then you look at the core problem (people) and resolve the core problem.

You dont take away cars because people abuse them.

 

You're just embarrassing yourself.

 

Am I? Parse the sentence then. Answer the questions.

 

not from where I sit. He's honest about his motivations. gun banners rarely are

 

Yeah. You don't have to think if you don't want to.