Susan Rice Ordered Spy Agencies To Produce ‘Detailed Spreadsheets’ Involving Trump

Why would anyone be surprised at what this piece of **** Susan Rice would do? How obvious is it that she's a worthless hack?

 

Rather like Rosenstein who just announced that the DOJ would not prosecute the journalists who have joined the clandestine intelligence spooks to violate The Espionage Act in a scheme to nullify the last election.

 

If you didn't read post #241 then you really should though it's a safe bet you don't post anything without trolling instinctively and inveterately.

I suppose it's my fault for giving you the time of day to begin with. P.S. say hi to your colleague for me.

 

Hate to note it but Trump seems to have just given up and turned his administration over to deep state vampires.
I wonder if guys like Mike Lee, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul are going to speak up about our hopelessly corrupt government.

The illusion of a two party system fools many into thinking one party puts a check on the other.

 

CNN’s Tapper: Obama has used Espionage Act more than all previous administrations.

 

Ah. So it'll take 3000 illegals to pay the same amount in taxes that Rachel "breaking news!" Maddow uncovered, for the one year she tried.

Your point escapes me.

 

Hey -


Senate intelligence Committee

Remember this one ?

It's time to shut Mueller down now.








...

 

It is almost time for Mueller and his ilk to be brought before grand juries to explain what they knew and when they knew it.

"March 6, 2016

George Papadopoulos spoke with a Trump campaign official identified in court records as just "Campaign Supervisor” and says that he learned that a principal foreign policy focus of the Trump campaign was an improved U.S. relationship with Russia.

March 14, 2016

Traveling in Italy, George Papadopoulos met an individual who was a professor based in London. Later identified in federal court records as “The Professor," the man initially seemed uninterested in Papadopoulos. However, after Papadopoulos informed the Professor he had joined the Trump campaign, the Professor appeared to take great interest, court documents said. Papadopoulos was interested in the Professor because he claimed to have substantial connections with Russian government officials, which Papadopoulos thought could increase his importance as a policy adviser to the Trump campaign."

USA TODAY, Trump and Russia: A timeline of the investigation, AFP, Dec. 1, 2017.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...vents-related-russia-investigation/914959001/

 

Rank and file FBI are pestering Congress to let them testify in open hearings against abuses of power and law by Obama's leadership at the agency. Sounds like a revolt to me.

 

And trump sounds honest to you. Wonder if there is a correlation?

 

LOCK THEM UP!

Lying Redactions:

he FBI Claimed it Redacted the Embarrassing Fact of Andrew McCabe Spending $70,000 of Taxpayer Money on a Conference Table Due to "National Security" Concerns

Obviously, we must believe everything the Deep State tells us.

Former FBI deputy director Lying Andrew McCabe, who was fired for lying under oath, spent $70,000 in taxpayer dollars on a conference table. The Corrupt FBI also redacted the conference table’s steep price tag from documents that members of the Senate Judiciary Committee requested, in an attempt to hide it from Congress.

In a letter sent to Deputy Attorney General Rat-Faced Rod Rosenstein Wednesday, Sen. Chuck Grassley revealed that the FBI had redacted the cost of the table from a document he and his fellow members of the committee requested to see. Grassley said many of the redactions within the documents made no sense, nor were they made to protect national security secrets.

"Congress, and the public, have a right to know how the Department spends taxpayer money," Grassley wrote. "I am unaware of any legitimate basis on which the cost of a conference table should be redacted. Embarrassment is not a good enough reason. The manner in which some redactions have been used casts doubt on whether the remaining redactions are necessary and defensible."​

 

I recall that Obama let the FBI just go full out on Hillary Clinton all the way till days before the elections.
And here you are thinking only Trump was under investigations. lol

 

and yet you will believe every news story that uses anomynios sources as long as its bad for Trump So don't start now being skeptical of anomynios sources

Its happening now many rank in file FBI agents have asked to be subpoenaed by congress so they can spill the beans without repercussions

 

I don’t trust anonymous source from any partisan hacks.

 

Okay. You seem like an "honest, fair minded" guy". What does it sound like to you when lower level FBI agents and employees want to tell their story before a congressional committee?

 

What does it sound like when those congressional committees don't subpoena said lower level employees? Especially since republicans are in charge of all those committees?

Amazing how relentless the right wing conspiracy factory is despite being consistently contradicted by facts, reason and logic. You appear to be a good customer.

 

You tell me. FBI agents have requested the chance to tell their tale without suffering retribution from Comey friendly forces.

Because this hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it won't happen.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...-want-to-spill-dirt-on-andrew-mccabe-n2483507
This piece is less than a week old and the issue is very much on the front burner. LOL@U! I know you are eager to kill the matter but
your rationalizing is a bit transparent and faulty.

 

and the anonymous sources you do believe doesn't come from partisan hacks? CNN isn't partisan? MSNBC isn't partisan? NYT isn't partisan? WaPo isn't partisan?
peddle that crap elsewhere I ain't buying it

 

Doesn't mean its going to either. Just because an asteroid hasn't hit the earth doesn't mean it won't.

I'm not trying to kill any matter, I'm merely pointing out the flimsy conspiracy crap that trumpettes continually come up with. Each more desperate than the last.

If McCabe did anything illegal then he should be charged. so far he's only lost his reputation and pension.

 

And there goes the NY Times off into the sunset.

 

What doe Republicans in charge of committees have to do with it? While not very active, there are many Republican congressmen cheering on the Democrat coup from the sidelines.

 

For the record and the hundredth time, McCabe did not lose his pension.

 

Right, but I'm not the person crapping all over the idea of FBI personnel telling their side of things before a congressional committee just because it has yet to happen. You are.

At what point in your mind does "flimsy conspiracy crap" become a real thing, given that just lately that idea that was long ridiculed and called paranoid, that the Trump campaign had spies embedded in it by the Deep State, is now an acknowledged reality (albeit it's called a good thing, according to liars like James Clapper and James Comey). https://www.redstate.com/diary/Bonchie/2018/05/24/james-comey-admits-spying-emo-tweeting/
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...its-to-spying-from-inside-the-trump-campaign/

Is this the sort of flimsy conspiracy crap you refer to?

 

What a pile of crap. They never seated a grand jury so they had no means to compel testimony, which is why they passed out immunity like party favors. With a straight face you compare that to Dirty Bob's scorched earth tactics in the Dirty Bob witch hunt?

Grassley’s letter and the revelation about the sweeping redactions, which included hiding the cost of office furniture, is the latest in an ongoing fight between members of Senate Judiciary Committee and Justice Department officials. Members of Congress have been attempting to figure out if the DOJ acted properly throughout its ongoing, year-old investigation into President Trump and his campaign associates led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/24/andrew-mccabe-spent-70000-table-fbi-hid-congress/

 

Here! Here!