Sweden: Man shot dead in broad daylight

For those of you who have never lived in Sweden or the UK, this usually means the perpatrator is muslim.

Translation: Apparently the muslim perpatrator shot the man because he was homosexual. With crime reports, it is all about reading between the lines in Sweden.

 

Meanwhile in scandinavia

 

And in England...

"Man accused of Anuj Bidve killing calls himself 'Psycho Stapleton' in court
Kieran Stapleton told a court his name was 'Psycho Stapleton', after being accused of the Boxing Day murder of Indian student Anuj Bidve...."


Read more: http://www.metro.co.uk/news/886177-...mself-psycho-stapleton-in-court#ixzz1iLEzNdQ7

 

.
It's wonderful how Anders repeatedly churns out the same types of story , never understanding or learning .

It is not worth my time or effort to try and rescue someone brain washed into views others regard with repugnance .
Let's keep it simple and say that the presented analysis is factually nonsense and that balanced people are fully aware of the key motivating factors behind such crimes , which are carried out by all sorts of cultural groups and ethnicities .
In Britain we have a crime that punishes people with prison if they incite Racism or preach intolerance toward specific groups .
Why not come to Team GB , Anders ?

 

Some have claimed such laws are highly selectively enforced, in favor of those not of native GB descent.

 

Just be content they're not internationally applied to internet forums. It might clear some of this place out sharpish.

Although here, the new religious bigotry laws are targeted at internet.

 

"Native GB decent" - what does that mean? Anyone with Roman, French, German, Dutch, Scandinavian genes are excluded? Because the average "Englishman" is a mixture of all of the above.

 

You have a fixation about trying to spell out to us what every ten year old already knows , who studies any History , let alone British History .
We know , thank you very much , Leffe .
It is not actually relevant , thank you .
The whole world ---except you ----understands how the term "English person "works . And in the same way we understand the way every other similar description works where a country's name is involved .
I appreciate you may have only just found out how the system works , but don't keep repeating a non useful point ad nauseam .Thanks .

 

Shut up. Moving to another country and failing to understand the most elementary aspects of the language, do not give you free licence to speak on behalf of your host nation.

Instead of blithering on here, take a lesson in the English language.

 

I cannot accurately comment .
Usually people making such claims are like the OP who writes with an agenda .
Often they deliberately ignore both sides of a decision and sometimes deliberately mis-report .
Being realistic , any smart institution knows how and when to be flexible , particularly when new rules and understandings need time to embed themselves .
Of course the Law should be applied equally and without favour . But occasionally we need a Solomon to apply the Laws . Such people are hard to find
I believe the way we try to apply our Laws sometimes , is a strength and underlines our tolerance and humanity . It is not a guaranteed sign of weakness as some simple people on this Forum seem to imagine .
Trying to be human in the face of the Law is one of the most difficult tasks imaginable and no doubt there will be errors of judgement .But few .

 

Any 10 year old will know, native english speaker or not that Leffe is right. The english are highly mongrelised.

 

We like to think it makes us unique

 

Leffe!

 

Steady there tiger!

 

My very point , Ian Dub Dub ( can you read ? )
That is precisely our strength .
But what was your real point for posting ?

 

Trust you are OK after your Ban . Hope you have been studying and now realise that there is a big and difficult world out there for you to handle .
Come on Janpoor . Let's have a sensible Topic from you .

 

Unlike yourself, Raymondo, I haven't been banned recently...

Per usual, you haven't got your facts straight.

Happy newyear and the best of wishes.

 

To be fair (since I try not to be ethnically biased when reporting crime) here is a picture of the perpatrator:


Here is a question: Is the British media guilty of wholescale racial discrimination by so often only showing a picture of the perpatrator if he is white? Are most violent crime in the UK comitted by whites or by first generation immigrants? Show me some proof of the former.

 

Agreed. England can go to hell for all I care (though many members on this forum do care). I am simply using it as an example of what could, and will, happen to the other countries. We all know that the standard of living in the last two decades in england has taken a severe slip for the worse in the third-world direction. How bad will it have to get for the british to admit there might be a connection with its lax immigration policies?

Yes, white people comitt crimes too. But judging by what we see in the multicultural media, one could easily be forgiven for thinking that most crimes are comitted by whites. So how do you explain the fact that more most (more than 50%) of the prisoners in France are muslim? Not even counting the other immigrants? Yes, Yes, the French civil servants try very hard to keep the lid on that inconvenient statistic. We can be sure that hell will freeze over before we see some accurate statistics on the ethnic composition of prisoners in the UK!

 

Our resident fanatic has now introduced what he calls "evidence" from France to support his mad claim that assimilation of ethnicities is a bad thing .
How funny it is to watch someone squirm when they have nothing concrete to demonstrate .
He truly believes that the large number of Muslim prisoners there shows how badly they are assimilated into French culture . He is so myopic that he truly believes that his explanation is correct and all embracing .
And the reason ?
Because they are Muslim , or , in Anders language , because they are inferior and dangerous .
In Britain , the equivalent is Polish men .
But do you hear anybody taking any wild and extreme position about this ?
No , of course you do not .
Why?
Because they are white people and "OK " , whereas Muslims are not white and " Tainted with the breath of brother extremists

It is a disgusting type of argument but that's what Racism is . Isn't it Anders .

And of course Anders does care about England , despite his feigned pretence otherwise . He cares so much that it is the only subject he can write about . He writes obsessionally about race .It drives him crazy that England has got on so well with its immigration policy .
He cannot bear to see his leader's ideas made to look cheap and silly , as well as nasty .
But that is what fanatics do .

 

You completely misunderstand me, the english were mixed race well before they conquered and colonised most of the known world, the problem you have and that most racists have is that you think white skin denotes specific ethnicity, it doesnt.

 

I have made it very clear in several other posts that race is only a much broader category, and that each race encomposes numerous different ethnicities within it.

 

I wonder why the burden should not be on the "multiculturalists" (actually multiracialists) to prove that immigration of outside ethnicities will not cause numerous and severe problems. I think it is people like you who have nothing clear to demonstate. Better just to keep massive waves of other races out. Is it fair? Perhaps not. But it certainly is not fair to those living in Britain to be transforming it into Pakistan, with all the crime and poverty that accompanies it.

If you are one of those outside races living in England, my apologies that they let your parents in to begin with. Should have just given them foreign aid in the country they come from. Or if they were persecuted, should have paid some other country like Brazil to have taken them in.

People like you are the ones that brought on all the racism by promoting racial diversity in the first place. If progressives really wanted a society free of racism, why are they bringing in more diversity? It will just lead to more conflict.

 

The man's in jail

 

And there speaks the fanatic and uninformed .
He admits it is unfair ---- sub text , Racist.
But then Racism is supported by the same sad old story ---- that immigrants bring crime and poverty .
The standard Racist propaganda .
The truth of the matter is , that the complete opposite best reflects our country .
Anders , your old ideas are laughable nonsense . And your latest idea that Team GB is now little Pakistan are so comical .
Try and travel more , Anders .
Obviously you are banned here , but that is your own fault .