No, you didn't. You ignored it then, as you are ignoring it now. Argument of the Stone Fallacy. Argument By Repetition Fallacy.
yes I did. I directly addressed them. It's amusing you still throw out terms you don't know the meaning of. [FQUOTE]Argument By Repetition Fallacy.[/QUOTE] facts don't change, not sure why you would expect me not to repeat the facts. Atheism is by definition, not a religion. Atheism by definition means lack of belief in a god or gods. That is the opposite of belief.
nah, its just one more very inconvenient question that you continue to dodge. Someone once told me they lack the gas to get to LA, so I asked: "how much gas do you need?" They responded about 1/3 of a tank, so we filled the car up and went the rest of the way to LA because we no longer lacked gas. So how much belief do you lack?
I’ve proven it is not. By definition, atheism is not a religion. The exact same way not playing baseball isn’t a sport.
Nope. You can tell by the fact those two sentences are different. Atheism is the lack of belief in a god or gods. By definition, that is the opposite of a belief.
Antonyms for belief disbelief, discredit, doubt, nonbelief, unbelief https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/belief Sorry 'lack' is NOT on the 'by definition' list! PLONK! Thats the sound when it hits the bottom of the trash can!
See Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 215-16, 92 S.Ct. 1526, 32 L.Ed.2d 15 (1972). A religion need not be based on a belief in the existence of a supreme being (or beings, for polytheistic faiths) Sorry rahl, a deity is not a requirement, youve proven nothing. nor must it be a mainstream faith, see Thomas v. Review Bd., 450 U.S. 707, 714, 101 S.Ct. 1425, 67 L.Ed.2d 624 (1981); "We address his claim under the Free Exercise Clause first. An inmate retains the right to exercise his religious beliefs in prison. Tarpley v. Allen County, 312 F.3d 895, 898 (7th Cir.2002). The problem here was that the prison officials did not treat atheism as a "religion" Kaufman demanded atheism 'by definition' is not a religion, he was overuled by the court. youve been shown this several times. .
Strawman No court has ever ruled atheism is a religion. Ever. They have ruled that atheists are protected by the first amendment. You’ve been shown this dozens of times.
strawman they have Anytime a court rules that you have a right to exercise your religion, its a determination that whatever you had before the court is a religion, even if its not playing baseball. "We address his claim under the Free Exercise Clause first. An inmate retains the right to exercise his religious beliefs in prison. Tarpley v. Allen County, 312 F.3d 895, 898 (7th Cir.2002). the inmate is an atheist, you have been overruled.
That ruling did not declare atheism a religion. It rules that atheists have 1st amendment protections. No court, at any time, has ever ruled atheism is a religion. This is reality. You are as usual, completely incorrect.
sure did! they declared atheism is a religion despite his claim it was not. if its not a religious right what kind of right it it?
quote the portion of the ruling declaring atheism is a religion. no court, at any time, has ever ruled atheism is a religion. They ruled atheists are protected by the first amendment.
