The Church of Climate Change

I did read it. 3 times. Still makes no sense.

Why don't you try to write (and think) rationally and coherently?

 

Quote a single scientist that disagrees with me. If this doesn't makes sense, then you haven't actually read it.

 

Can you describe the mechanism which traps air in ice?

Thanks.

 

Bubbles. You're welcome.

 

This is church literature that is in violation of the science that I have already quoted.

 

Yeah CO2 is released when ice melts. So is nitrogen, oxygen, a speck of helium and other trace gasses.

What you are implying is that ice gathers CO2. That is contrary to known science.

 

Thanks Bubbles. You smart axx.

 

You've cited no such "science." You've falsely claimed that global warming violates unidentified laws of thermodynamics.

 

How do you think the CO2 got there when you claim it is impossible for it to exist in ice?

 

It's in the air Bubbles.

Air has CO2 in it, what you did not know that? What I can't understand is how adding air to the atmosphere results in more total CO2. Can you explain that to me again?

 

If you knew bubbles existed in ice, then it shouldn't have been necessary for you to ask. Do you now understand that there are bubbles in ice and that those bubbles have gas in them?

 

Yes. Bubbles have gas in them. That's why they are bubbles. I'm glad you know that now.

 

You missed me Yardmeat.

With every bullet so far.

 

The Laws of Thermodynamics are not science?
The Stefan Boltzmann Law is not science?

I've truthfully claimed that global warming theology violates the 1st and 2nd Laws of Thermodynamics.

 

I didn't miss anything. You are just finally catching up on what I've been telling you this entire time. What do you think happens to the bubbles in ice when the ice melts? This shouldn't be difficult question. While you denied that melting ice releases CO2, I never denied that air has CO2 in it. You would know this if you had actually read.

 

No. It doesn't. And no scientist makes the claim that it does. Hell, no one with an elementary understanding of physics or higher says it does. Your claim is bull ****.

 

First I'd have to figure out what your point is, which is so far impossible.

It certainly doesn't have anything to do with anything I've said.

 

Whether or not you can defend your supposed scientifically is irrelevant to whether or not your position is scientific? I call bull ****

 

SCIENCE you've quoted?

Global warming is the long-term heating of Earth’s surface observed since the pre-industrial period (between 1850 and 1900) due to human activities, primarily fossil fuel burning, which increases heat-trapping greenhouse gas levels in Earth’s atmosphere. This term is not interchangeable with the term "climate change."

 

He claims that the greenhouse effect violates the laws of thermodynamics. Needless to say, this is nonsense.

 

So Yardmeat, we still don't know your position. Does melting ice release excess CO2 or not?

I thought I heard a Warmist claim it does.

 

Ice have bubbles. Bubbles have gas. Melty ice release gas. Comprende?

 

No I still don't understand your position. Does melting ice release excess CO2 into the atmosphere?

It's a yes or no question.

 

So what are the "shiny reflective surfaces" on a molecule of CO2 or any other greenhouse gas?

How is that supposed to work with an invisible gas?

 

Do you understand that bubbles can have CO2 in them? If so then you understand my position very well. If not, then you don't understand what bubbles are. Which is it?