Noam Chomsky - The Clinton Vision [video=youtube_share;MCeichuaPqQ]http://youtu.be/MCeichuaPqQ[/video] The Clinton doctrine goes far beyond the Neoconservative PNAC but it was issued under the radar and the administration didnt slap allies in the face with it. Most of the critisisms of the Bush doctrine were almost entirely based on it's style and the way it was implemented, not the substance. US foreign policy has remained largely the same since the end of the second World War. And within the Grand Area: As the New York Times was promoting the "market democracy" system, the editors conceded that the goal of NAFTA was to: Newsweek correspondent Marc Levinson observes in Foreign Affairs: A Latin America Strategy Development Workshop at the Pentagon in September 1990 concluded that there was a potential threat in Mexico: There is no longer the threat of democracy now that Mexico is "locked into the reforms" by treaty, permitting "complementary" but not "competitive" development which would encroach on US interests. The US doesnt even need death squads anymore.
You have to remember that most people that don't see the clear and simple truth by now, are either too lethargic, stupid, or a combination of the two. You are better off selling hope and change, or a vision of the past that never existed. I have no issues with playing the game by their rules, and you shouldn't either. Next time you do a similar thread, use the same facts, but pepper the op with fear, and other emotional appeals. Here read this, it will help identify the tactics that will be used against you, and give you the option of fighting fire with fire. You know, name your thread something like 'Clinton and Bush hate our troops, proof inside'. http://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm
The first step is to ignore television news. Every single study has shown that people who watch the most television news are the most misinformed and uninformed.
