The edge, boundaries, or firmament is protected by almost every nation. It is known as the Antarctic treaty. The longest lasting and uninterrupted treaty ever. What you don't think that when they found out the heliocentric model was wrong, they had to either tell the world or hide it, and take precautionary measures thereof. Shortly before the fake moon landings they found out the heliocentric model was wrong. But that would mean that all these universities phd's and schools was teaching wrong. So they continued the lie. Well the lie like all lies is finally catching up. http://www.ats.aq/seleccion.htm http://www.ats.aq/documents/atcm39/ww/atcm39_ww007_e.pdf https://travel.state.gov/content/passports/en/country/antarctica.html
False. There is a ton of HD video evidence. If I start a thread and fail to back up my claims with anything but words and drawings, you can call me a hypocrite. Since you have never seen anything with your own eyes, you have to come to terms with the fact that you could be wrong and will have doomed yourself to a life of loneliness for nothing.
Maybe it only appears like a long treaty because the days are 6 months long in Antarctica!!! (You don't have to reply; I was just mocking you!)
I provided for you the entire treaty. It's not a wonder that your unwilling to read it. You would rather just spout meaningless words from your mouth. You don't have to reply, I was not mocking you rather telling the truth.
That's funny. The shape of the earth in it's entirety might not be a flat plane. But I most certainly KNOW it's not a ball. For that goes against all observations of reality including physics. They think earth is a ball due to how the heavenly bodies move, that's the only reason. As if the movement of the heavenly bodies has anything to do with the shape of the ground they are standing on while observing the skies. That in itself makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. "But we circumnavigated the earth." Does driving around your neighborhood, make your neighborhood round/sphere?
The problem with this theory is that the distances don't fit. If the earth is flat, and the edge is Antarctica, then the distances between South America and Africa would be much longer than they are.
This is not yet known by the average people but Antarctica is said to not be the edge, but one must go through it to get there. According to some flat earth researches, there are 33 continents. I personally stick to the scriptures. Which tell us there are four corners of the earth, and there are ends of the earth. "Hitherto shall thou come but no further, and here is where thy proud waves be stayed." So at the boundary of where we can no further, the water (waves) is also limited. "Who hath divided a watercourse for the overflowing of waters, or a way for the lightning of thunder;" Better yet, it's a very short chapter so read what God has to say about those who think they have understanding of creation. I will highlight in red my opinion of key notes. KJB Job 38- 1Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said, 2Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge? 3Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me. 4Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. 5Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? 6Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof; 7When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy? 8Or who shut up the sea with doors, when it brake forth, as if it had issued out of the womb? 9When I made the cloud the garment thereof, and thick darkness a swaddlingband for it, 10And brake up for it my decreed place, and set bars and doors, 11And said, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further: and here shall thy proud waves be stayed? 12Hast thou commanded the morning since thy days; and caused the dayspring to know his place; 13That it might take hold of the ends of the earth, that the wicked might be shaken out of it? 14It is turned as clay to the seal; and they stand as a garment. 15And from the wicked their light is withholden, and the high arm shall be broken. 16Hast thou entered into the springs of the sea? or hast thou walked in the search of the depth? 17Have the gates of death been opened unto thee? or hast thou seen the doors of the shadow of death? 18Hast thou perceived the breadth of the earth? declare if thou knowest it all. 19Where is the way where light dwelleth? and as for darkness, where is the place thereof, 20That thou shouldest take it to the bound thereof, and that thou shouldest know the paths to the house thereof? 21Knowest thou it, because thou wast then born? or because the number of thy days is great? 22Hast thou entered into the treasures of the snow? or hast thou seen the treasures of the hail, 23Which I have reserved against the time of trouble, against the day of battle and war? 24By what way is the light parted, which scattereth the east wind upon the earth? 25Who hath divided a watercourse for the overflowing of waters, or a way for the lightning of thunder; 26To cause it to rain on the earth, where no man is; on the wilderness, wherein there is no man; 27To satisfy the desolate and waste ground; and to cause the bud of the tender herb to spring forth? 28Hath the rain a father? or who hath begotten the drops of dew? 29Out of whose womb came the ice? and the hoary frost of heaven, who hath gendered it? 30The waters are hid as with a stone, and the face of the deep is frozen. 31Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades, or loose the bands of Orion? 32Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth in his season? or canst thou guide Arcturus with his sons? 33Knowest thou the ordinances of heaven? canst thou set the dominion thereof in the earth? 34Canst thou lift up thy voice to the clouds, that abundance of waters may cover thee? 35Canst thou send lightnings, that they may go, and say unto thee, Here we are? 36Who hath put wisdom in the inward parts? or who hath given understanding to the heart? 37Who can number the clouds in wisdom? or who can stay the bottles of heaven, 38When the dust groweth into hardness, and the clods cleave fast together? 39Wilt thou hunt the prey for the lion? or fill the appetite of the young lions, 40When they couch in their dens, and abide in the covert to lie in wait? 41Who provideth for the raven his food? when his young ones cry unto God, they wander for lack of meat. Earth is turned as clay to the seal. Or a stamp of clay/wax pressed unto a seal/envelope, which would have upturned edges, and circular in shape. The square and compass from freemasonry, I believe is a symbol of knowledge. Earth may very well be a circle within a square. Square and compass.
Wow! A bunch of words again. You don't KNOW anything. How come no flat earth people are interested in exploring "the edge?" How come there is no live video stream from the flat earth side? On one side, there is a ton of evidence from educated scientists, and on the other, a bunch of words and drawings from kooks. Add this to there being no useful motive to lie to the world about the shape, what we have is someone consumed by a conspiracy theory to the point of fanaticism. That puts you in the same category as those who believe 72 virgins await them in the afterlife.
It is not JUST a process no matter how many times you claim otherwise and no sir not everyone is a scientist especially YOU. You are wrong and proven so and you know it and you willfully ignore PROOF and EVIDENCE thus proving you know nothing about science
All you are is a broken record. I'm really not trying to hear it. When on this forum, if you see "flat earth", why is it you click on it? Is it to mock and ridicule those who believe such a notion? Is it to try and convince them otherwise? Tell me, how does one believing the earth is flat hurt you? I don't believe same sex marriage should be legal, but it is. Do I go around trying to convince them otherwise, do I go around mocking and ridiculing them. NO I DON'T. Because I don't waste my time on those who have such vast differences within crucial areas, such as a "belief". Why do you?
It is to correct your stupidity. You are preaching to others and trying ( failing but trying ) to spread a stupid and childish idea. You have failed to provide evidence of any kind whatsoever. On the other hand evidence has been put in your face and you only lie in cowardly fashion about it now grow up and face the facts you are proven wrong AND YOU KNOW IT
No, I don't know it. And you have only provided "evidence", which can be used as proof, yet also not necessarily "proof". Of course someone of your intelligence wouldn't know that. There is plenty of evidence for a flat earth. Some that are mutually noticeable. Of course someone of your intelligence could never find "evidence" for a flat earth.
WOW.......some peoples kids. There is no such thing as "gravity". It has never been proven, they also claim they don't know "what it is". They say the can measure with it, but when one starts asking "what it is", the answer from Neil de Grasse Tyson himself is as the following: "I don't know". All that is needed is pressure, density, buoyancy, electromagnetism, and the medium in which the variables are being measured. Gravity is a theory, and most certainly is "not needed".
Yes you DO know it and are lying to say otherwise. Stop lying because you DO KNOW you have been badly proven wrong. You have never posted any evidence of any kind WHATSOEVER. That disgusting book written thousands of years ago proves NOTHING. But it is filled with proven lies and contradictions. Every OTHER attempt at evidence you have made has been shredded, crushed, debunked and proven false and YOU KNOW IT. Evidence in your face which irrefutably and conclusively proves you wrong you lie about and willfully ignore AND YOU KNOW IT. You lie like the most egregious sinner then adopt a pious attitude which proves blatant hypocrisy. There is no evidence whatsoever of a flat earth. Now explain how it is light on one side and dark on the other which can only happen on a round earth. Explain how this picture is fake. DO IT NOW or never post again. https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-medi...rogressive,q_80,w_800/1436593142286392866.jpg Show some evidence for your lie about NASA stating all of it's pictures are CGI. Answer these questions NOW. YOU are not a scientist. Everyone is not a scientist. Science is more than a process. Scientists accept and address evidence which YOU HAVE NEVER DONE. You do not get to redefine words to defend your retarded and idiotic assertions.
This is what you said: Now explain how it is light on one side and dark on the other which can only happen on a round earth. This is a perfect example of your lacking ability to think for yourself. Have you ever seen a street light shining it's light unto the ground? Tell me, why is it that light doesn't cover the entire ground of the earth? Is it because the light is small and local, thus the light can only put forth light across a specific distance. Should I explain better, or give you the chance to somewhat think for yourself?
Nasa admits that the Blue Marble 2002 is CGI. When comparing any other nasa image to this, or even putting nasa images of planets or asteroids in a photoshop website (to determine validity) the results are negative, null, void. Why are you asking me to provide evidence that a photo which was never proven real, is fake? First provide any real nasa image of any planet or so called celestial objects. If you can provide a real image, with the evidence of it being real and not just your opinion, than I will most certainly show you where your wrong. Otherwise we are just arguing opinions, which leads nowhere.
Wrong. If a light can be seen from Japan to Australia and IT CAN. Then it would be visible EVERYWHERE if the earth were flat. It is day on one side and light on the other BECAUSE it is round and you are willfully lying to deny that fact. Now answer the other questions as well and acknowledge that you have been pwned and proven wrong. Stop the lies and obey your primitive ignorant holy book
You need to stop putting the flat earth in with the heliocentric model. Your trying to intertwine two different theories. There are multiple flat earth models, some in which have multiple suns. But you wouldn't know that because you don't like to understand what your arguing against, you don't even research it. You just sit there on repeat as your masters intended you to, barking out whatever it is they told to bark out. Now that's a good little boy, are you able to sit, roll over, and play dead. Maybe you can work on that last one a little more.
No I am not and you need to answer the questions and address the evidence you keep running from. I am repeating myself because you are willfully ignoring facts and evidence like a sinful coward. Start obeying your damn holy book and stop lying and answer the questions. I have no master YOU do obey him and stop the lies. That fictional retard jesus tells you not to lie and that is what you are doing ANSWER the questions and address the evidence
You know when a religious freak get's their religion mocked and ridiculed, they become very hateful and filled with anger. Why is it you do the same with your ball model. Was you indoctrinated into "scientism" the new religion? It sure seems that way. For you act just like a religious person when their religion is mocked. It's safe to say..................... I know what your religion is.
No it is not safe to say that because have no religion now stop running in fear and answer the questions and address the evidence which you have seen. Atheists are smarter and have higher morals than people of faith and that is proven. I am not mocking a religion YOU are mocking it by willfully lying which is a sin as you know. Stop evading and answer
