The evidence is in, and the Ferguson PD have a deep racial bias

http://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/a...ivers-update-investigations-ferguson-missouri
"In fact, our review of the evidence found no alternative explanation for the disproportionate impact on African American residents other than implicit and explicit racial bias."


Remember before the trial of Darren Wilson the right wing was saying "wait for the evidence before condemning him!!" Well, the evidence is in and Darren Wilson has been cleared, but if you believe the evidence from the Department of Justice that Darren Wilson is cleared, than surely you must believe the evidence from the exact same Department about the rest of the Police Department in Ferguson as a whole having deep racial bias? You see, when the DOJ says Darren Wilson is clear, the Reich-wing says "TOLD YOU, STUPID COMMIES!" but when the very same Department says the FPD as a whole have a deep racial bias, "Damn DOJ is the one with the real racial bias!! Damn liberal Marxists in the DOJ trying to divide our great country!!"

If the right-wing is willing to accept the evidence from the Department of Justice that Darren Wilson is innocent, than surely they must accept the evidence from the Department of Justice that the Ferguson Police Department has a deep racial bias? Why accept one report from the Department of Justice wholeheartedly, but not the other? Clearly because one fits your narrative, the other does not, its being selective about the facts and its blatantly obvious to anyone not on the far right. If I am willing to admit, based on the evidence from the DOJ, that Darren Wilson is not guilty, is there any right-winger here with the guts to return the honor and accept the rest of the DOJ's evidence about the rest of the Ferguson Police Department? I doubt it, but at least this way they are being called out on their double standards. Its quite literally a double standard too, two reports were released, a double, but they accept only one and not the other even though its from the exact same Department at the exact same time

Just remember, the more you guys deny the evidence the easier it is for everyone to call you guys racists, because thats exactly what you guys are, just like the Ferguson Police.

 

That's 'cause they're stupid.

The simple observation that "black people commit more crime" provides a very viable alternative explanation, one supported by the data from almost every major population center in the United States.

Go figure - Holder's DOJ could "find" no alternative explanation.

 

So you are going to go with the argument that "black people commit more crime"? Ok than, good luck with that, see how much support you get from anyone not on the Far-Reich

 

I'm not going to accept the verdict.

It's not objective and unbiased.

It's being done only to placate people.

 

See, you nailed it. And you proved my point. Holder is stupid. He doesn't care about science. In fact, it's exactly as you say - science is politically incorrect, so the idiot progressives are going to be stuck in the dark ages forever.

Your point is that anyone who's not on the "Far Reich" is denying reality, they're so tuned out they can't even envision obvious answers to simple issues.

Holder's DOJ is completely bankrupt, morally and intellectually and every other way. His "report" is laughable.

There's not even a law that says local police departments have to report arrest statistics. And for that reason, the FBI has a very hard time collecting them and reporting on them.

And I'll betcha dollars to donuts there's a partisan political reason for that too.

 

So, what is your view on their report on Darren Wilson's innocence? Is that "report" "laughable"?

- - - Updated - - -

If this were true, than why did they find Darren Wilson innocent?

 

There was no evidence to support such a conclusion, so they would have done something criminal.

But they can do this, there is nothing against the law to do this.

 

What "report"?

Oh, you're talking about the Grand Jury decision.

As distinct from a mere bull(*)(*)(*)(*) "report".

You don't understand. These people like Sharpton, if they can't loot a store then they're going to take someone's job. This is what the race-baiting-for-money crowd does, it's who they are. People like Sharpton have a long history of doing stuff like this (remember Tawana Brawley? Steven Pagones? Sharpton is a convicted libeler and slanderer for that one, and the worthless scumbag even refused to pay his court ordered restitution - that ******* should be behind bars instead of prancing around the country in thousand dollar suits).

And Obama, he's buddy-buddy with Sharpton. He's invited Sharpton to the White House almost forty times! That's more than even Oprah!

Don't you even consider for even a minute that some of that Sharpton scumbaggery rubbed off on Obama and Holder?

'Cause look, they're doing the same thing Sharpton's doing, they're taking peoples' jobs as if they meant nothing, as if a livelihood and a career were mere game pieces on a political chessboard.

These Democrats are some very nasty people. Word.

 

No, im talking about the Department of Justice report on Darren Wilson, not the Grand Jury. Do you agree with that report?