When you go on Wikipedia, and search for 'Sandy Hook conspiracy theory', you get a page with a basic overview, albeit loaded with disinformation. But try searching Giffords shooting conspiracy theory. No results found. Absolute burial. Once they feel their lies are the accepted popular perception, they pretend the many giant elephants in the room never existed. We won't be able to use their own system against them for very much longer. Step by small step. One internet medium at a time. ...
I should hope you would realize that this thread makes no sense at all, and is an answer to a question that has not even been asked by a rational person.
You never bothered to research details surrounding the Giffords shooting hoax. But you attack me anyways. This is getting old, bro. I must've said something a long time ago that hit too close to home for you. I wonder what it could've been. Bet it was something about tool bag dudes who compensate for their lack of originality, and lack of personality, by getting themselves covered in tattoos and peircings. LoL. Is that what it was? Just curious.
Your second post to this thread is less comprehensible than the first. Loughner is nuts-o. There is really nothing else to know about it. No loose strings to tie up. It all makes sense as narrated in the press. No evidence to the contrary exists within the context of this time/space continuum.
Try finding one single image of Giffords bleeding. You won't. Cause it was an active shooter Drill. Staged. You also will never find any images confirming she was the "victim" on the stretcher. I dare you to bring forth a single image which, in any way, confirms she was shot that day. And all she does since the shooting is wear prosthetics and read bad lines from bad scripts. Its fake, buddy. These are govt actors playing out roles in propaganda pieces, designed to drill home the concept of citizen disarmament. All the worlds a stage, and you just don't get it. Im only trying to help you, child.
The press generally withhold such pictures if the victim or family object to using them. Got evidence? Such drills are too rare. Yours is the more absurd position. The burden of proof is on you.
http://azcapitoltimes.com/files/2013/03/Congresswoman-Shot-Re_Wylo.jpg There is blood in this photo. No you aren't going to get to see the photos of her open skull. But here is the thing. Giffords has been a gun rights advocate. If this was some kind of conspiracy to get people to ban weapons why not choose a higher profile person who opposes gun rights? Conspiracy theorists are irrational and illogical.
That would require her release and I doubt that she needs that in the papers. How do you make a person who argues against your agenda to shut up and join you by shooting her in the head?
