No you didn’t. You said it’s “hard to get an absentee ballot”. Clearly it’s not. There is nothing about indefinitely confined. Or that COVID isn’t a reason to get one. Sorry if I don’t believe your word on that.
You have to show ID unlike Nevada that mailed out ballots to everyone on the voter rolls. Now address the indefinite confinement issue I posted.
The absentee indefinite confinement category that does not require ID. Jumped form a normal count of about 1,000 to 169,000 for 2020. https://elections.wi.gov/node/6788
Well yes. Not conspiracy theories but hard data from WI via what The Voter Integrity Project put together. Only verified data was used.
The flaw of so many of these fraudulent theories is that they look at history/norms. With massive spikes in mail-in voting, norms are meaningless. In person will skew much more heavily republican and obviously mail-in will skew heavily democrat.
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha....sorry, when I asked for a link I meant to a credible source. Sandoval (a Trump appointee) is part of a hastily convened team led by Matthew Braynard, a data specialist who worked on Trump’s 2016 campaign. Another participant is Thomas Baptiste, an adviser to the deputy secretary of the Interior Department who also took a leave to work on the project. Ya....no bias there.
You certainly proved you did not watch the video but then blinders appear to be the lefts current fashion trend.
After seeing the first chart I knew it was BS. Then I did some research to see who this guy is. That’s when I found out he’s a Trump loyalist in addition to the others in this group. Seriously, if there is all this evidence then why have all these cases been tossed for NO EVIDENCE? Oh and I hope you appreciate the irony of your blinders comment. Hahahahaha
Wow, you are still repeating uneducated nonsense. The 33 some odd cases brought by other groups were dismissed due to lack of standing, not lack of evidence. The data pulled by this group is being supplied to current lawsuits and the FBI wants the data on double voting. Trump and Powell’s lawsuits have standing so must be addressed by the courts.
You made it up. You provided again, NO evidence. All fraud occurred in Republican areas. Using your logic.
LOL, I provided the state link to indefinitely confined requirements and the numbers according to state records. You can now attempt to prove the state wrong.
This is a yes, but who cares? They weren't malicious, and were so few that they would not alter the elections any more than the extra 87 votes that Trump's paid-for recount did. And it's also a your "leader" is bamboozling his most fanatic loyalists to give him money that has nothing to do with the elections.
And your claim on those requirements? What is that, and the proof? And if I use your logic, all fraud occurred in republican areas.