My question to you is why do you care? It's quite obvious to me (as with your posting history) that you're not interested and this entire thread exhibits zero sincerity on your part. What's also obvious to me and should be obvious to you (if you were indeed sincere) is that a study of this type should necessarily take quite a bit of time if one were to produce a peer reviewable paper in order to ensure the highest level of quality and accuracy possible. An expert who has a genuine interest would want nothing less. It did after all take NIST almost 7 years to produce their fanciful concoction (they had to make sound as reasonable as possible). The difference is rather than invite peer review, NIST did everything in their power to prevent it. I'm quite certain those who funded this study (AE911Truth) are well aware of what's going on and have a keen interest in the results. MY prediction is that Dr. Hulsey will present something on or around 9/11/18 but I can't speak for him, it's just an educated guess, unlike your worthless baloney. It may be just another progress report or it may be the peer reviewable paper itself. We'll see. After nearly 17 years of despicable official lies I'm quite patient.