Bullshit ... he can publish his works through the University of Alaska ... unless of course he is looking for a payday ... like most troofers ... please write to him to release his findings for peer review ... before his grad students (how many now?) get tired of his waffling ...
The University of Alaska is not a commercial publisher. Hulsey's work is linked at the UAF website. Everyone is looking for a payday. Do you work for free? Hulsey will release his work for peer review when he's ready whether I contact him or not. But if you're impatient or just FOS, feel free to contact him yourself. Leroy Hulsey Department Chair, Civil and Environmental Engineering Professor, Ph.D., P. E., S.E., Civil Engineering (907) 474-7816 Duckering 243B jlhulsey@alaska.edu
The end of the year promise of the release of the report has come and gone. Now we're more than a month into the new year and no word as to what's going on. Saw THAT coming.
I stand corrected ... UAF can release his findings through appropriate channels ... usually not ... but I have done pro bono engineering reports for friends and colleagues that need help from being ****ed over ... the construction industry can be shady ... I have sent him numerous e-mails from my professional account ... not a single reply ...
If that's true then what's posted below at the website is false and that is completely unethical. WTC 7 Evaluation is a completely open and transparent study. As part of the research process, a draft report will be released along with all data related to the study, and there will be a six-week public comment period. Sign up for the newsletter if you wish to receive announcements when new research material is added to the website. http://action.ae911truth.org/p/sals...ibe_page_KEY=1112&killorg=True&loggedOut=True Did you sign up for the newsletter? What was the nature of the emails you sent if I may ask?
http://action.ae911truth.org/o/50694/t/0/blastContent.jsp?email_blast_KEY=1336103 From the website linked above: Coming up on almost 2 years since it was originally promised. So much for the ability for the general public to "scrutinize the research as it is being conducted".
It's extremely rare but I agree with you 100%. However, it is claimed that Hulsey's paper along with all the data and models will be peer reviewed. Something NIST avoided like the plague. The good news is that regardless of whether his paper is ever published or not, there's more than enough data, evidence and other relevant information proving that the NIST "investigation" was nothing of the sort and that the resulting NIST hypotheses were impossible and more than likely designed to coverup the facts about the destruction of the 3 towers on 9/11. Hulsey's peer reviewed work, if it is ever that, will only serve to confirm those facts. As it is Hulsey's work is long overdue and there is no accountability for the tardiness. Having said that it did take NIST 7 years to come out with their phony garbage. In NIST's case I imagine it took a lot of effort to be creative enough so that NIST felt their work would make sense on a scientific/technical level. Unfortunately they could not work around Newton's basic laws of physics (not to mention common sense) and get away with it no matter how hard they tried.
There's this contact information below. Contact Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering PO Box 755900 Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-5900 245 Duckering 1760 Tanana Loop Phone: (907) 474-7241 Fax: (907) 474-6087 E-mail: fycee@uaf.edu
All of them. Without a legitimate investigation that the US government is mandated to conduct that's all there is is a coverup. Where have you been? Correct, no one can work around Newton's laws, that's what I said. And that's why NIST's reports are an insult to intelligence and to science in general. I am exactly on topic. Hulsey's work/report is all about NIST's impossible WTC7 hypothesis, what on earth do you think it's all about anyway? Did you study his work? Perhaps YOU don't know what this topic is all about.
If that's true then what's posted below at the website is false and that is completely unethical. WTC 7 Evaluation is a completely open and transparent study. As part of the research process, a draft report will be released along with all data related to the study, and there will be a six-week public comment period. Sign up for the newsletter if you wish to receive announcements when new research material is added to the website. http://action.ae911truth.org/p/sals...ibe_page_KEY=1112&killorg=True&loggedOut=True Did you sign up for the newsletter? What was the nature of the emails you sent if I may ask?[/QUOTE]I asked him of updates and his source material ... I don't expect him to reply ... I'm sure he gets smoke blown up his ass by fanboys desperate for confirmation of their crusade from the new messiah ...
why dont you post what you sent him, maybe we can figure out why he didnt respond to you. Whats really surprising is that none of his students responded either. I woujld be very curious to see why they all ignored you
I simply asked him of any updates on his study ... have you sent him any emails? ... surely he would respond to an enlightened individual such as yourself ...
No need for me to bother him, I have been telling you how this would turn out for years, but I am happy to see you acknowledge my enlightened brilliance, and if I did write to him he would happily respond since he too recognizes my enlightened brilliance.
really? ... what have you been explaining to me for years? ... that no Hulsey report is forthcoming? ... then please send the old dude an email and ask him for a progress update ... we would all love to hear from the professor prior to his departing this mortal coil ...
The NIST report on WTC7 took 7 years. I’m sure you were biting your nails for at least 6 years waiting for that one.
This isn't about the NIST report. The title of the thread is about the Hulsey report. Take your off topic content elsewhere. You want to constantly complain about others being off topic, how about you look in the mirror.
It's also interesting that Hulsey keeps breaking promises and deadlines. I thought all the research was going to be "transparent" and "shared with the public" as the project moved on. We all see how that ended up.
Is that a joke? Are you saying you haven’t a clue what the Hulsey report is all about yet you’re so worried about how long it’s taking? You don’t know the Hulsey report is all about the NIST report on WTC7? How ignorant is that?
