Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan, the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party. Founded as an organization by Confederate veterans in Tennessee, in 1866. The KKK soon became a paramilitary group devoted to launching a ‘reign of terror‘ against Republican Party leaders, black and white in an effort to overthrow of Republican governments and the reassertion of white supremacy. Although illegal today they use the the liberal media as a terrorist arm of the Democratic party, relentlessly spinning, demonizing, attacking, ... at the same time covering for their choice candidates careless, lawless acts with emphasis on the table scraps their candidates promise to throw to their supporters. Who needs armed henchmen when you got the Liberal media who can control your mind. Let the attacks from the left begin!
On September 28, 1868, a mob of Democrats massacred nearly 300 African-American Republicans in Opelousas, Louisiana. The savagery began when racist Democrats attacked a newspaper editor, a white Republican and schoolteacher for ex-slaves. Several African-Americans rushed to the assistance of their friend, and in response, Democrats went on a Negro hunt, killing every African-American (all of whom were Republicans) in the area they could find. (Via Grand Old Partisan) On April 20, 1871 the Republicans passed the anti-Ku Klux Klan Act outlawing Democratic terrorist groups. The Miller Center reported this-day-in-history-republicans-pass-anti-kkk-act-outlawing-democratic-terrorist-groups/
How Liberal Media Profit from Supporting Democrats The liberal media wage a very aggressive effort to defend Democrats whenever the media reveal a scandal. These actions imply that the media has an agenda. Why media benefit from Democratic rule and policies may yield some useful insights. The traditional explanations of why the media favor Democrats are focused on their education: liberals are instructed in liberal ideology in college. Grant Money: The universities receive grant money to research projects oriented to promote the liberal model of society, the economy, and environment. Access: Anger the the politicians with annoying questions they may lose access. Market demographics: Both the media and Democrats are dependent on demographics for their survival, the Democratic party controls the populations of the major states and cities. Democrats control the cities.... The media have their own financial interest rooted in demographics... their own advertising revenue Continue...
On August Ninth, 2016, the Republican Nominee, suggested insurrection if he lost. He gave a wink and a nod to the gun freaks, and declared them on a mission from GOD. And you came back with this WEAK SAUCE?
Democrats aggressively acted to maintain their cities' populations but it has gradually fallen. (Chicago lost 180,000 black residents just from 2000 to 2010) so cities need a constant flow of immigrants to replace them. But the flow of legal immigrants is too small to replace the numbers lost. Democrats in the largest cities of L.A., Chicago, and NY sponsor illegal immigration in order to save public sector union jobs and congressional seats. But illegal immigrants are funded through Federal programs that create debt for all voters. The news outlets in Chicago can't discuss the huge public debt, since it will make Democrats look bad. http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0076/twps0076.html The media have their own financial interest rooted in demographics, they protect the corruption of the Democratic Party and cause the expansion of national debt and unemployment. These actions are a far cry from their self-proclaimed role of whistle blowers and protectors of the people from government. Instead of exposing this corruption, they blame everything on corporate greed. One can ask whether liberal media focus on corporate greed to cover up their own advertising revenue greed and the government greed of the Democrats they support. Do people who can't find decent jobs really believe that illegal immigration helps them?
We're up against a systematic, effective campaign of misinformation conducted by guard and attack dogs... We're up against the "corporate media".
By controlling the media outlets, they maintain a grip on the mind of the average American, who only knows I saw it on the news. http://archive.democrats.com
Yeah, yeah, we have heard this spiel so many times before. The media are FOR PROFIT. Why would they be on the Dem side? They report whatever gives them viewers and ratings. If at all, some of the outlets may be oriented to Dem viewers because Fox has monopolized the right wing audience. Also, if all media were liberal, why did they promote GWB's war and help reelect GWB by swiftboating Kerry?
We're up against a systematic, effective campaign of misinformation conducted by guard and attack dogs... We're up against the "corporate media". No thinking on your part required.
There is no doubt what so ever that the MSM is the attack dogs of the DNC. If it were not for Fox News, talk radio, and the internet we would be in the dark when it comes to the truth.
Fox News IS mainstream media... While you can find the truth on the internet, it is often times covered by a lot of garbage. Talk radio is where the "truth" goes to die.
Notice the unconscious sub-text of this OP.... he's already making excuses for why Trump is going to lose.
OP doesn't understand the meaning "terrorism." Granted that it is a somewhat fluid term but still, it typically involves physical violence or the threat of physical violence.
OK. Your premise seems to be that history is an indicator of current actions of a political party. Lets apply that. Republican President Nixon caught lying to public and becomes the only President to resign office in disgrace. Using your logic, we know that Republican Presidents are prone to disgraceful acts that will cause them to resign the office. Republican majority leader Hastert indicted on Federal Charges and admits to sexually abusing boys. Using your logic, we know that Republicans are prone to be indicted on Federal Charges and molest boys. That is your assertion in this thread - that past actions reflect current attitudes. At least my facts are a little more recent.
Glad you are starting to catch on but, it is not just he "liberal media". It is the entire mainstream media (left, right and center).
Why would the for profit corporate media care whether they support the left or the right, when the ONLY goal they have is to make as much profit as they can? I agree that the media do have an interest to advance corporatism. Last I heard, though, was that the GOP is the corporatist, free market party, until some GOP voters all of a sudden discovered this election season that they don't like free trade, at least when it is a GOP candidate who is against it. If it is a Dem candidate against free trade, they are usually labeled as communists by the same voting bloc.
The media - 6 that control 90% - are mega corporations owned by the elite super rich, global corporations and foreign governments. They are not "press" as meant in the Bill of Rights. They are corporate propaganda outlets.
