The Liberal War Against White Males in America Today

So researchers at your local university are dominated by women 2:1 and a study of 371 universities found universities prefer women 2:1 over identically qualified male candidates-eh???

In Science we call this CONVERGING LINES OF EVIDENCE all coming to the same conclusion, like say glaciers melting and plants blooming earlier in climate change.

Know what I'm saying???

 

Ooops, I didn't post the entire article, hahahaha.....here it is in it's entirety

Equal Accountability Equals Equality
“Today, the average full-time working woman earns just 77 cents for every dollar a man earns…in 2014, that’s an embarrassment. It is wrong.”
–President Obama, remarks on equal pay for equal work, April 8, 2014

Liberals believe stupid things because they believe completely in things in the complete absence of evidence in the presence of overwhelming contradictory evidence, and The Wage Gap is an excellent example of this. That’s why it’s another stupid thing Liberals believe.

Normally you’ll always find these three statistics in every single study you read: a mean, a standard deviation, and a measurement of statistical significance like confidence intervals. However, a study exists on the wage gap that’s so good it doesn’t have confidence intervals. Normally a study will calculate confidence intervals because they tell you how likely population statistics are within a certain margin of error of the sample you actually took based on that samples size. However this study was so inclusive there was no need to calculate population parameters like confidence intervals, because the sample in this study is the entire population. This study is that good. The study titled tiled “An analysis of the reasons for the disparity between the wages of men and women” was prepared for The United States Department of Labor Employment Standards Division in 2009 by the CONSAD research corporation.

The 2009 study for the United States Department of Labor Employment Standards Division found that all but 5% of the 22% wage gap is explained by choices made by the genders and there’s no evidence to suggest the remaining 5% is the result of discrimination. In fact evidence suggests the remaining 5% gap is the result of more choice namely the Researchers at CONSAD believe the 5% gap is the result of women choosing more compensation in the form of non-wage benefits but the Researchers at CONSAD couldn’t quantify this factor because of the limitations of their model, namely multivariate regression analysis.

When there is a high R value (coefficient of correlation) between dependent variables in multivariate regression analysis the results can’t be quantified because there is said to be collinearity. Basically, when there is collinearity, you can’t tell what’s influencing what. Is the dependent variable, benefits, being influencing by the independent variable, gender, or is the dependent variable being influenced by another dependent variable in the model? However, it’s possible that the remaining 5% is the result of more choice that just couldn’t be quantified statistically. In a forward to the CONSAD study Charles E. James, SR, Deputy Assistant Secretary For Federal Contract Compliance wrote:

Although additional research in this area is clearly needed, this study leads to the unambiguous conclusion that the differences in the compensation of men and women are the result of a multitude of factors and that the raw wage gap should not be used as the basis to justify corrective action. Indeed, there may be nothing to correct. The differences in raw wages may be almost entirely the result of the individual choices being made by both male and female workers


Even though it’s almost been entirely proven that the wage gap is the result of choice, not discrimination, liberals insist on blaming the consequences of women’s choices and actions on men. For example, Barack Obama also insinuated a 22% wage gap exists that’s the result of discrimination in his 2013 and 2014 State of the union addresses. [5]

Some of the pay gap can be explained by what the genders tend to choose to study at university. For example, men are much more likely to study STEM (science technology engineering and math). For instance, in a paper by Andresse St. Rose titled “STEM Major Choice and the Gender Pay Gap” she found in 2007 women earned 17 percent of Bachelors degrees in engineering, compared to earning 79 percent of Bachelors degrees in education. In 2006 women earned only 20 percent of Bachelor degrees in physics, computer science, and engineering.[2] In a 2007 paper by Dey and Hill titled Behind the Gender Pay Gap they found STEM degrees tend to have higher salaries than their peers with degrees in other disciplines. For example, one year after graduation, an education major working full time earned, on average, about 60 percent as much as an engineering major working full time ($525 versus $851 per week)[3] Despite earning most of the degrees in post-secondary education women are choosing not to major in subjects that result in them being qualified for the lucrative careers men are more likely to be qualified for when they graduate, and according to Liberals this is men’s fault? If liberals believe in equality then shouldn’t they believe women should be equally accountable for the consequences of their actions and choices as men? Blaming men for the consequences of your actions and choices is not accountability.

For decades, liberals have claimed that discrimination blocks women from landing academic positions in STEM fields. However a paper published online by the National Academy of Sciences by Wendy M Williams and Stephen J. Cecil titled National Hiring experiments Reveal 2:1 Faculty Preference For Women on STEM Tenure Track found that in experiments with professors from 371 colleges and universities across the United States that science and engineering faculty actually preferred women two-to-one over identically qualified male candidates for assistant professor positions. [4]

If you’re preferred 2:1, you’re not being discriminated against. Some people might even suggest a 1:1 preference of identically qualified candidates would be equality and a 2:1 preference for women over identically qualified male candidates is actually an indication of discrimination against men, not women.


Bibliography



[1] CONSAD Research Corporation 2009. “An Analysis of Reasons for the Disparity in Wages Between Men and Women” Prepared for The United States Department of Labor Employment Standards Administration Accessed August 23, 2015. http://www.consad.com/content/report...l Report.pdf

[2] Andresse St. Rose 2010. “STEM major choice and the gender pay gap” On Campus with Women
http://archive.aacu.org/ocww/volume3....cfm?section=1

[3]Dey, J. G., and C. Hill. 2007. Behind the pay gap. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation
National Association of Colleges and Employers. 2009. Salary survey

[4] Stephen J. Cecil and Wendy M. Williams, “National Hiring Experiments Reveal 2:1 Faculty Preference For Women on STEM Tenure Track,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/...ulty-positions

[5] Glenn Kessler,” President Obama’s persistent ’77-cent’ claim on the wage gap gets a new Pinocchio rating,” The Washington Post, April, 9th, 2014, The Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...occhio-rating/

 

Read this thread.

Liberals do all three of those things

 

time travelling

 

psychoanalyzing

 

The university I got my BSc from banned white males from campus, which should be illegal according to the 14th amendments equal protection clause. (white males are the only race and gender not protected by the constitution today)

The 14th amendment is the same amendment used to end segregation in the south during the 1960's.

The university I got my BSc from also has a student lounge for "students of color only."

A white male professor came to campus anyway.

He received death threats and had to be escorted off campus by the police for his safety.

Students of color and women carried baseball bats on campus as a warning to any other white male who might come to campus to get an education.

Students of color and women formed a large angry mob chanting, "black power, black power, black power," while cornering white people minding their own business and calling them "racist."

How can students chant "black power," while calling other people, "racist," and not see the irony???

It's because "white male privilege," is taught at every single liberal arts university in America and according to WMP all white males are racist whether they know it or not and African Americans are not capable of racism.

And your claim is bigotry against white males is not accepted today???

 

do you mean "Anita Hill"???

 

For every 1 person in the social sciences who does not identify as a Democrat 8 others do and that doesn't even mean the 1 who does not identify as a democrat identifies as a republican either.

And 82% of social scientists admit that they discriminate against Republicans.

18% of people in the social sciences actually identify as Marxist.

So it's easier to find a Marxist in the social sciences than it is to find a republican in the social sciences.

as per the fake one sided history. Liberals only acknowledge the white men in the south who fought for the confederate army to keep African Americans enslaved.

They never acknowledge all the white men who fought and died for the union to end slavery.

In reality, more white men fought to free the slaves from bondage than fought to keep African Americans enslaved but you never hear about that.

 

you mean like as in testosterone poisoning???

 

Firstly Roundup is not Bt-toxin and Bt-toxin is not roundup

Bt-toxin is a pesticide

roundup is a herbicide

Do you know the difference???

Secondly Corn or any other organism do not contain a gene for roundup.

There's no such thing as a gene for roundup.

This is 10th grade biology here, but the only thing genes code for are proteins.

This is what's known as the central dogma of biology:

DNA ----->RNA--------->amino acids---------->proteins

Roundup is not a protein its an Organophosphate

thirdly

Farmers have been using Bt-toxin long before Monsanto ever existed, since the early 20th century and human beings have survived pretty well considering our food supply has been poisoned for well over 100 years.

fourthly

Gluten Sensitivity is another one of these fake as illnesses dreamed up by these quack snake oil salesmen naturopaths to make money off of gullible people like yourself.

Watch he won't respond to this post.

Watch.

 

You have privileges .....my husband always said had he not been a white make he never would have gotten where he did...
Why do you think you lack power?

 

Your focus is comical....yeah, let’s get them women..lol

 

I wonder if you were as upset when top universities preferred only men and ignored more qualified women for hundreds of years.at least the women are as qualified. By the way your statistics are bullshit. ..

 

time travelling

I wasn't alive hundreds of years ago and neither were you.

 

ultimately equality is in women's best interests and women will achieve more if they're equal.

Do you disagree???

 

Yeah white male privilege is another stupid concept brought to us by feminism along with slouching (bad posture) is discrimination against women.

People who believe in white male privilege (WMP) believe all the accomplishments of white males are the result of privilege and not individual effort. It's like saying African Americans dominate sports as a result of hundreds of years of animal husbandry thanks to white males and not their individual effort.

WMP teaches the poorest white male like say a homeless man living on the streets is more privileged than the wealthiest African American such as Oprah Winfrey who is worth over 3 billion dollars

It's arguably the dumbass belief in the history of beliefs next to slouching is discrimination against women

 

yeah evidence sucks doesn't it

(when it doesn't support your beliefs)

am I right

No amount of evidence matters to liberals. It doesn't matter how good the evidence is. It doesn't matter.

 

What priveledges do you believe that I have?

 

Maybe if you took a minUte you would find it wasn’t hundreds of years ago....women didn’t have educational opportunities 50 years ago....or many others.! Come on educate yourself

 

You’re not viewed with suspicion and discrimination against you because you’re a white male. You don’t get sexually harassed.

 

White men had so many more opportunities and their networking system perpetuated it. You’re comparing homeless against homeless is ludicrous and making Oprah the rule instead of exception is ludicrous. Who actually believe that blacks and women have not been historically discriminated against speaks volumes.

 

Yes....and women are achieving more because of opportunities denied to them throughout history....and it seems like it’s uosetting you that you have to share the pie.

 

Oh......now I'm sobbing uncontrollably.

Drat.

 

Show me the evidence, I am a liberal...we check things out for legitimacy. And don’t just believe because some rightwing extremist says something is a “fact” It takes intelligence to realize if that were true all the universities would be female dominated. But like a true rightie, the kind trump counts on, you want me to believe your “facts look because you say something I should just accept it. Too funny

 

Guess I'll have some pie.