The mask slips on the “global warming” agenda. Tells shrinking white population to have less kids

https://www.rt.com/news/440859-afp-fewer-children-backlash/

We are told that we need 3rd world immigration because we are not having enough children to sustain our economies. The same people believe that we need to have even less children in order to fight global warming, which will require even more 3rd world immigration.

Meanwhile, none of these organizations are talking about Africa’s exploding population.



Africa can’t sustain the population it already has without tons of aid from primarily white countries, so what happens when the population quadruples in less than 100 years?

Whites have historically been the most concerned with protecting the environment, so if that’s your main issue, you should want more whites in the world, not more Africans.

If the left really believed the world was on the verge of a cataclysm they would be trying to do everything in their power to keep poor dependent Africans from having an exploding population, yet they are more concerned with decreasing the white population, a group already in decline.

That’s their real agenda.

 

People talk about Africa's population all the time.

Anyway, this could be more about resource-intensive countries. The richer a country is, the more resources they use, and to create those resources causes a lot of emissions.

 

First the left tells whites in rich countries to have less kids. Then they say those same countries have a shortage of young workers and third world immigration is needed. Interesting game.

 

All straight line projections share one thing in common. They're seldom right.

 

All this means is conflicting interests. Some want ultra cheap labor and a force to prop up certain pyramid schemes and others who believe the population should be reduced.

 

You don't reduce population by bringing in third world immigrants. What you do is alter society and that's the lefts agenda.

 

The 'left' can attempt their social engineering schemes while business people entice immigrants over for cheap labor. Business people clamoring for cheap labor are in both parties.

 

Business people are not calling for white natives to have less children

 

That's the point. It's two interests going on. One set of people clamor for immigration for their reasons and another set is talking about global warming for other reasons.

 

No the point is the left demands first world countries stop having children in the name of global warming and then they demand immigrants be allowed in because of a shortage of young workers. It's the politics of global warming.

 

You're trying to absolve the 'right' and it's not possible here. They have been complicit in the immigration issue. Immigration was an issue long before this global warming push. It really is about competing interests and it has been that way in this country for centuries.

 

You are trying to obfuscate and derail. The subject here is the warmers call for reducing population and then demanding immigration.

 

This is your belief. All I did was offer that it's not necessarily the same people calling for both. We'll just have to agree to disagree I guess.

 

That's convenient? Don't force a no-child policy for anyone on welfare or illegals or countries that can't sustain themselves, but make sure the most qualified and able to actually afford children have less. WOW. I'm shocked. =)

Hey Libs, we want the wealthiest and most intelligent people to have MORE kids and the poor and uneducated to have less. THAT makes for a better world dummies. This isn't a right vs left thing. Its whats best for the survival of the human race. Otherwise we have Idocrisy, the movie. The first 10 minutes is BRILLIANT!!!

We wouldn't have a hunger or disease problem in certain parts of the world if we simply allowed nature to do what nature is forcing on all of us. And its a fight we can't win, so why keep fighting? And as heartless as that might sound, it really is the only logical solution. We're trying to fix a leak that can't be fixed.

 

No worries,

At which point the better armed will still have a protein option And asking if you'd like Mexican, Chinese or Dark meat will become far more relevant and literal than it is today!

 

Just one of the political aims of the global warming nuts.

 

How about certain groups (you know who you are) stop having 5 kids and expecting government to support them?

 

So you have some evidence to suggest the UN projections are not correct?

 

It’s definitely gross that the left wants to destroy the white race in this way. I assume that’s what you’re referring to.

 

Nature has always had a way of keeping populations in check so that they cannot grow exponentially in areas with not enough resources. We decided af some point to override the force of nature by Marxist concepts such as global redistribution of wealth, but you’re right, this is ultimately an unsustainable situation.

If our tax dollars are barely staving off mass starvations and mass die offs from disease on a continent that already cannot sustain 1 billion people, how can we expect to do this when that turns into 4 billion in just a few decades? We can’t. And there is not enough room in Europe, North America, and elsewhere to take in an extra several billion people.

Until you hear the left start talking like this, you will know they are not serious about global warming or similar issues. This is really just an agenda against white Europeans.

 

Why would they? This is the new way in which countries are conquered by foreign tribes. It’s working for them.

 

Sorry. The White Nationalist call of “white genocide” was outed as the creation of the KKK by the son of Stormfr-nt founder and ex grand wizard in his book. It’s pure bs and a public relation ploy to rebrand the KKK.

 

Yet that’s exactly what is happening and what is being promoted by your fellow lefties.

There is no other way to explain why a group would tell whites to stop having children even while they are far below the replacement rate, and at the same time, encourage the importation of fast breeding non whites.

 

Do they? African and third world overpopulation used to be big issues during the 60's and 70's. That was all part of the "population bomb" thesis. But since then, the issue of third world overpopulation seems to have virtually vanished. The first world has (minus immigration) negative population growth, so if population is a problem, the first world has solved it.
I didn't see anything in that article about Africa controlling it's population.

 

White people of European ancestry are already breeding themselves out of existence, and now we have world health announcing that male sperm viability is in rapid decline world wide and medical science does not know why??