You keep forgetting that compound adjectives have hyphens. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...he-authenticity.603023/page-4#post-1073763750 Right there is impossible-to-refute evidence Translation: This is a tough one to obfuscate so I'm going to try to avoid addressing it.
The serial forum spammer is cornered. He has actually nowhere to go and knows it. For a supposed expert on English your absurd inability to read seems obvious. Borman is venting his spleen at van Allen for some reason. He doesn't say they went through the thickest parts, he suggests his radiation reading indicates that the thickest part offered no danger. You seem to have pathetic failures with memory too. Apollo 14 by virtue of unfavourable Earth tilt managed to go through more denser regions snd still were well within safety limits by a considerable margin! To summarize, what mad world of supposed fakery does this overdub need to have anything of the sort? It is insanity to suggest that supposed actors reading from a script need to do this crap! We have Duke talking to the crew, loud enough to hear and the suggestion is that some pathetic subterfuge is going on because of a muffled "tuff" sound is made to get them to respond? Irrelevant. The footage shows a distant Earth that matches the Apollo 11 photography, which matches with prevailing and very accurate hurricane data. Right there is impossible to refute evidence. You have no credibility to lower. You only have ignorant denial. Answer the Jump Salute post, I'm interested to see your follow up failure!
Wow. You are determined to keep making this mistake. Right there is impossible-to-refute evidence. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...he-authenticity.603023/page-4#post-1073763750 If I were your teacher, I'd call your mother and tell her you were being pig-headed in class.
If he wasn't in the thickest part of the Van Allen belts, how was it possible for him to measure the radiation levels there? http://www.politicalforum.com/index...anding-is-fake.553296/page-24#post-1073764481 I'm no expert but wouldn't his instruments have to be in the part of the belt that he was measuring? How far away from that part of the belt was he when he was measuring it?
NASA used dosimeters. They transmitted the readings to mission control just after transit. I would be very surprised if he even knew where in the belts he actually was. But as I stated, so what! Ignorant hoax believers conflate the effects of the belts on humans without any evidence to do so. The Command Module shielding was more than sufficient to counter any ill effects and this with the very short transit time, meant a very small dose. Apollo 14 did roughly the same thing with the Earth tilt working against the routine elevation angle (that you ignorantly claimed wasn't 30 degrees from Florida - at just under 30 degrees latitude!) Seriously, you don't ever need to type this. You are the opposite of an expert in every relevant discipline. They measure wherever he is, it would not be possible to go straight through the middle from Florida. He's just being a dick at the scientists. What is obvious is the idiotic and deceptive cherry picking in play here. Borman "admits" they went through the center of the belts, whilst also saying the dose was no more than a chest x-ray! How come you believe one statement verbatiom but don't even mention the other. Deceptive! So either he went through the center and still lives (or mistaken about this) or he's supposedly lying about it all, in which case your useless logic fail is once again in operation!
You have a knowledge base in one subject it seems. If anyone gets to lecture about being a teacher, it isn't you. If I was your teacher on any number of things, you'd get a big pointy cap with a "D" on it and a stool in the corner.
I just said the rocket went due east until it was out of sight. In the scenario of their faking the missions his lying about this makes sense. They needed an explanation for their having gone through the belts after Van Allen's original findings had been published. Watch this at the 1:08:04 time mark. AMERICAN MOON (2017): A FASCINATING DOCUMENTARY ABOUT THE MOAN HOAX FROM START TO FINISH https://www.bitchute.com/video/CoP5WywgvPHs/ Then watch the whole thing from the 59:20 time mark to the 1:14:20 time mark. At the 1:08:04 time mark it says that NASA says that Apollo 14 went through the heart of the belts.
Clueless. Did you have your compass out! What is due East anyway from 30 degrees above the equator!? I explained that that isn't how orbital mechanics work. The rocket would naturally be pulled into a 30 degree inclined orbit around the planet! Be a man, withdraw your pathetic "moot" point and assume that NASA rocket engineers and mathematicians understand this just a little more than you do with your daft observation! Utter gibberish and an excuse to repost spam already addressed. No, closer to the center. They received a higher dose accordingly! Apollo 8 did not go through the center, Borman is not correct.
I just came across this. Moonfaker: Radioactive Anomaly II. PART 2 At the 4:00 time mark Jarrah White says that the route that the Apollo spacecrafts are claimed to have taken, which allegedly took them through the outer edges of the Van Allen belts, would have given them lethal doses of radiation so it would have been impossible for them to survive if they had really gone through that section of the belts. That series of videos has nine parts. I couldn't get them all with YouTube searches. I found them by searching each title in the main section of Google. Half of them weren't in the Google video section.
Look at the serial forum spammer. He thinks the 100% irrefutable proof already established will just disappear as he dumps his crap in other threads just to bump them and try and hide it! Run away and pretend, you aren't fooling anyone. The Black Knight at least had the balls to put up an honest fight. AFRAID TO ADMIT THE GAME IS OVER No you didn't. It's 11 years old batshit. Who cares what this fool says? The entire space engineer/ cosmology / astrophysics field have worked on this matter for over 60 years. Satellites operate within these belts quite safely for many years. It is utterly insane to suggest a lethal dose would have been given from 1hrs exposure in a shielded craft. Notwithstanding that we have hundreds of hand held images from the Apollo cabin and many more from the mapping cameras of the Moon. Why is he using a chart for unshielded exposure and then failing to apply the CSM shielding to these figures? And you understand none of them. Not only are you not qualified to understand them, you aren't qualified to understand any direct rebuttal. BUT, that wouldn't stop you from defending this bullshit at all costs.
This seems to be the best thread for this anomaly. At the 10:10 time mark Ralph René points out a picture that was used on two different occasions. Where Is America: 'Oh say can you "C" the Moon?' with Ralph René. Part 1 Here's part 2.
Check this out. Apollo 16 video alleged to show Astronot with an ungloved hand and some banter with Houston about it. https://www.reddit.com/r/moonhoax/comments/fd4oxl/apollo_16_video_alleged_to_show_astronot_with_an/ That seems to be the case. Who has an explanation for this?
Here's something else that looks suspicious. Apollo 11 Luner Module Hasselblad vs Video of take off, compared. Video version is more squat and very different. Another NASA fail? https://www.reddit.com/r/moonhoax/comments/ef6k8d/apollo_11_luner_module_hasselblad_vs_video_of/ That eight-sided object has different dimensions. If it turns out that they were from the same mission, this is another nail in the Apollo believers' coffin. Were all the crafts identical?
The ludicrous chuck batshit at the wall tactics, whilst bumping his spam threads. And the "if it turns out" moronic speculation phrase.
I watched this several years ago. The Apollo Detectives- Fifty Years on the Moon It's refreshing to see all the Apollo hoax pundits talking to each other with no disruption. This is good too. THE APOLLO “MOON” HOAX: “ONE GIANT LIP” FOR MANKIND https://ufospotlight.org/2017/06/28/3848/
]The ludicrous chuck batshit at the wall tactics, whilst bumping his spam threads. And the "if it turns out" moronic speculation phrase. You really are afraid aren't you. What type of sad person does this?
Really? You, the epitome of fear want to pretend that my thousands of responses to your batshit have missed a few, when you never reply to them anyway! MEH! #611 Has the imbecile Ralph Rene (who disputes the size of pi and Archimedes principle!) talking about the moronic hair on the slide copy. #612 Has the YouTube clown "archangelmike" making one of his pathetic "observations". He's wearing a glove, that's what they look like. Faceplant time. #613 What the hell are you taking? Is this something you actually believe? The image is a camera looking up at the LM on Apollo 11 and the video is a camera zooming in from distance on a level position Apollo 17. Once again joke batshit posts. If you were to present this crap in a crowded auditorium to experts in every field, you could be the dumb comedian who closes the show!
The height of the eight-sided plate in the picture on the left is higher than the one in the picture on the right. Do you see the difference? If it can be explained, please explain it. There's a theory that the lunar lander in the Apollo footage that shows the astronauts walking around is a life-size model and the one in the take-off footage is a miniature model. This picture comparison supports that theory and closes the case on it if that difference in size can't be explained. I want to put the video on full screen so I can get a better look but I can't figure out how to do it. Does anyone see how to do it?
Gibberish. The launch of Apollo 17 is a continuous unbroken long piece of video. Before the astronauts leave the Moon for the last time Schmitt launches the geology hammer. We see them zoomed in from afar, you can even see the hammer glinting in the sky as it is thrown. Then shortly afterwards, unbroken, we see the same craft launch from the surface. This is where you are afraid to explain yet another piece of ridiculously impossible to fake sequences! And we're done yet again! Just look at the intellectual level of this guy! Small children can do this simple thing.
The imbecile Ralph Rene and you get suckered in by him, says quite a lot about what kind of mind you have. The training image was used in his book, they messed with the image to remove the paraphernalia, so that it looked like he was in space. Collins didn't have an image of him doing his spacewalk, so his BOOK PUBLISHERS! mocked one up for him. Nothing to do with any fakery and only an idiot like Rene would fail to follow this up - of course once again we see the totally dishonest nature of Moon hoax film makers. Liars, just pure deceit making out is was anything to with the official record!
You didn't address the issue of the two plates' having different dimensions. The only thing I can think of is that would explain it is the possibility that lunar modules in different missions had slightly different designs. Of course the anomalies in the footage have already proven the hoax. This issue is about whether the difference in the dimensions of that plate can be added to the list of anomalies. I'd have to see the book to see if the picture was presented as factual or an example of what a spacewalk would look like. This is still up in the air
You just completely ignored my major point about Schmitt throwing the hammer on an unbroken footage showing also the launch! You troll with your proven crap! There are currently 5 major issues that you are cowardly avoiding that prove beyond any doubt that they must be on the Moon: 1. Jump salute parabolic dust arc in perfect time with the upwards section and stop of the jump. 2. Cernan jump, dust arc in perfect unison and time with his rise and fall! 3. Closing battery lid with ZERO air displacement in the direction where it would massively occur - 100% proof of a vacuum! 4. The LRV footage that you have no explanation for showing perfect lunar scenery - impossible to fake. 5. The lunar samples - you are worse than a layman. He even talks about it in the book. It's not "up in the air" - only deceitful people would maintain that. It's absolutely nothing to do with NASA and the liar Rene either knew that or was too stupid to check.
