The Not so Subtle Moral Decay of the US Military

I have a daughter. At any rate, sons are far more expendable than daughters.

 

Why do you people whine about something Donald Trump did or did not do FIFTY YEARS AGO?!! WTF!

 

why do people like you approve of Trump's bad acts, whenever he does them?

 

I don't. Try again.

And never answer a question with a question. It indicates intellectual bankruptcy.

 

what bad acts have you disagreed with Trump on?

 

the reason for that is because they wage war for profit... they send in their military, then also undermine their military by funding/supplying opposition...even using media like in Vietnam to stir opposition....nothing makes more money than keeping the killing going.

As for the moral decay... not a military specific thing, but country even global issue.. part of the communist toolbox used to attack the west

 

Utterly ridiculous in all respects. "operations" which is what military spending goes to during an active conflict is not very profitable.

 

Just off hand his rhetoric against NATO allies and other allies of the U.S.

 

weapons and military equipment sales on the other hand is very profitable

 

Of course.

1) But that is not part of "operations". Is is part of "procurement'.
2) "Procurement" declines dramatically during an active military conflict because funding has to go to "operations" (that is fuel, munitions, spare parts).

 

You misunderstand... I'm referring to why there are forever wars.... the supplying of weapons to the opposite side.

American made military trucks supplied to the Vietcong
Weapons supplied by the Obama administration to ISIS
Wall Street funding of Hitler
..... forever wars.... because money... how do you create forever wars.... by making sure there's an opposite side to wage war with..... how do you do this... ensuring they have funding and weapons

fck this is tiring

 

Wall Street funding of Hitler was IIRC all prior to the U.S. entering the war against Nazi Germany. And I'm pretty sure the truck supplied to the Vietnamese were originally supplied by the U.S. to the Soviet Union that transferred some to Vietnam.

 

Look, I can't be bothered educating you (find Anthony Suttons books he's the worlds best researcher)... you want to make excuses that's your prerogative.... but ask yourself this, have you honestly never wondered why America can't win a war? Are they just pathetic or is it possible that there are another money making agenda while American's die and come home without body parts.

 

A big reason the U.S. can't win a war since World War Two is simple:

It does not try to win. Ever since WW2 and the beginning of the nuclear age, when the U.S. has gone to war the emphasis is NOT on winning. It is on "containment" and "deescalation". The U.S. has always feared that if it actually "won" a conventional conflict it would cause the war to escalate into a potential nuclear confrontation which the U.S. seeks to avoid at all costs. This was true in Korea and it was especially true in Vietnam which was just a few years after the dangerous Cuban Missile Crisis.

 

no sorry, you are incorrect.

Antony C Sutton: Wall Street and the rise of Hitler & communism


btw. it is again wall street that funded the rise of China...Americas greatest threat, with help from the likes of Kissinger

 

lol first the commies' propaganda is the U.S. is evul racist imperialists, then when that spin no longer fits it becomes how we financed the commies too. Hilarious stuff; no wonder you leftists do lots of drugs and keep those drug cartels and gangsters rolling in dough. Oh wait, we finance those too, cuz the evul govt forces you losers to buy drugs as well. lol

 

Ah, well, that makes it okay then.

So what is the latest spin on why Democrats love them some Red Chinese commie labor racketeering too? So does your Uncle Bernie.

 

And it was the Soviet Union that collapsed, so it worked as a strategy. Now with Biden going to renew Obama's nuclear arming of Iran and most of the world's dictators looking forward to no interference from the U.S., a lot of wars are breaking out gain, and another Armenian genocide already on its way into the history books.

 

And thats why we need to replace them with machines.

 

Armed proles running around in the general population are also a menace to 'globalists' and Wall Street's agendas, another reason they need to replace soldiers with more compliant machines. Biden has already started a purge in the military to move that agenda along, targeting the demographics most likely to be patriotic and pro-American and purging them from the system. Turning the military into a jobs program and social engineering fiasco leads directly to the above problems and the current' solutions' of automation and doing away with patriotism and any loyalties to country along with eliminating morals and common sense from the general populace. those values have no place in corporate cultures or global workplaces,and they annoy bureaucrats no end..

 

You don't get it. The future of the military is robots. Pretty soon the humans will be taking care of door to door and maintenance. The robots will handle the big battles. The next step is for all major military vehicles to be remotely controlled.

 

Yes I do get it, and have said that drones and unmanned aircraft are the wave of the future long before you came along and said so. Now I'm schooling you in why it will become an even bigger priority under the communists in power now.

 

Not even close to being accurate. Drones would be utterly combat ineffective in any major war.

 

Not sure why you would say that. The USAF isn't so sure.

Combat drone to compete against piloted plane - BBC News
www.bbc.com › news › science-environment-52933958
Jun 5, 2020 — Air Force Magazine also described the development of autonomous fighter jets as a "big Moonshot" for the military. At a briefing organised by the ...

 

Apparently gullibility is a gender-equal condition.