Hi all, Was wondering what people's thoughts were on debating terrorism from a utilitarian perspective? Read an interesting post (http://blog.projectionpoint.com/?p=120) whereby the author's "idea was to accept, for the sake of argument, the premises from which jihadis start - to argue, in other words, entirely within their framework and show that suicide bombing is still wrong even when one accepts all the theological tenets of fundamentalist Islam." Thoughts?
