There's Evidence of Illegal Ballot Harvesting in This Swing State 'CPAC Chairman Matt Schlapp filed a complaint with the Wisconsin Elections Commission, citing evidence of ballot harvesting being committed in plain sight.' They are quite open about it. 'Schlapp claimed he had photogenic evidence and an eye witness who saw alleged ballot-stuffing outside Milwaukee City Hall. The complaint states that the witness saw an individual stuffing at least 500 ballots into an unguarded ballot box and then took off once the individual realized they were being watched.' Less than 21,000 vote margin in 2020. 22,000 in 2016 '“CPAC received reports of illicit ballot harvesting at the dropbox location outside Milwaukee City Hall. A witness reported an individual depositing a significant number of absentee ballots into the dropbox before fleeing the scene. Ballot Harvesting is illegal under Wisconsin Law.”' Please discuss.
let's see the evidence, love it when people say I have evidence, and then do not show it left or right, let's get to the bottom of it...
If Harris, the worst VP this country has ever known and who can't complete a sentence without sounding like a 5 year old, gets the most votes in history, then I'm going to look very favorably on how the right reacts.
I don't know what "photogenic" evidence is. I assume he meant photographic? Regardless, let's see it. I'm going to prodict that either he's lying and has no "photogenic" evidence, or the evidence doesn't actually show what he claims. Ballot boxes have slots that can maybe take 5 envelopes at a time. It would take a couple of minutes to deposit 500 ballots. So if someone actually saw it happening, they'd have plenty of time to whip out a phone and record it.
Considering ballot drop boxes are recorded 24/7, that should be very easy to provide that evidence.. if it actually happened
LOL! I guess the alleged ballot box stuffer must have been good looking ("photogenic")? In any case, watch RW media "stuff" the airwaves with fake "evidence" of voting fraud, in preparation of Trump claiming the election was stolen from him next week. And you come on here and faithfully peddle the fake news. The RW truly has an army of internet foot soldiers who willingly do the lying for them. And then they are surprised that people are worried about democracy, should Trump win.
I expect X to be brim full of "Schtoppen Dass Steal" conspiracies over the next week or two. Popcorn is ready!!
In that scenario, just like in 2020, Harris won't have won so much as Trump will have lost. Fueling your political hopes with nonsense MAGA narratives has left you unable to truly understand just how disliked Donald Trump is. Just like in 2020, there will be Republicans voting for Harris even if they vote Republican for the rest of the down ticket races. I'll bet there will even be Democrats doing the same(voting for Trump), but not as many, because Harris sucks too. I just don't understand how in 2024 you could still have even the slightest confusion over how Donald Trump can lose a race without assuming you live in a fantasy world. He's been losing races for the Republicans since he took office.
Not a single one went anywhere. Only proven were a few dead republicans and a handful of irregularities on both sides. The whole coordinated steal thing is bullshit. It's called crying wolf for the thousandth time. I repeat, it's all bullshit.
Oh, so you're absolutely sure sitting in your high tower that no cheating goes on in the digital realm.. You know, that's the perfect mentality tech criminals count on..
Proven Issues 2020 Federal Election 1. Isolated Administrative Errors: Localized instances of administrative mistakes, such as errors in mail-in ballot handling and minor clerical mistakes, were documented. These errors were found in both conservative and liberal-leaning counties, but they were isolated cases and were not on a scale to impact overall results. 2. Voter Registration Errors: Some states had errors in voter registration lists, including instances where ballots were mailed to old addresses or to individuals who were deceased. However, processes in place prevented these ballots from being counted. This issue was related to outdated voter roll maintenance rather than intentional fraud. 3. Rejected Ballots Due to Technicalities: Some mail-in ballots were rejected due to missing signatures or mismatched information. While this disproportionately affected certain areas, states reviewed these issues and worked to address them. No evidence indicated that this rejection process was systematically targeted or fraudulent. 4. Minor Instances of Double Voting: There were verified cases of individuals attempting to vote twice, usually by mail and in-person. These cases were few, detected quickly, and did not reflect broa der trends. https://apnews.com/article/voter-fr...donald-trump-7fcb6f134e528fee8237c7601db3328f ATLANTA (AP) — An Associated Press review of every potential case of voter fraud in the six battleground states disputed by former President Donald Trump has found fewer than 475 — a number that would have made no difference in the 2020 presidential election.
See above Post. No proven fraud to remotely affect the 2020 election. Even Trump's troops that he paid to investigate said that it was the safest election ever. See the above post.
Most people couldn't tell, and many simply blow reports off because of destructive and prejudicial bias, or in some cases dislike for other country's.. In fact, some folk actually get off watching American at one another's throats..
You do know that postal employees deliver mail in ballots to these boxes. That may or may not be the case here. If it is ballots harvesting there may be a chance that it was done by either party, correct? I have no problem with an investigation. I do have problems with assumptions.