The STEAL is ON in WI!

Congress cant reject any electoral slates unless House & Senate vote 51% to reject.

Not gonna happen.

 

Well according to DNCMSNBCNN rules and saturation participation it's perfectly acceptable..

Deal with it as if you were watching Morning Joe an Ho or a DNC spokesperson..

 

Didn’t you comment on a thread that claimed someone seen pictures of Trump with topless underage girls? Now all the sudden you care about evidence?

 

Nope, sorry.

 

So no evidence. Got it.

 

You have to remember that people feel just as strongly anti Trump as you do anti Kamala. Many including me is voting for who we dislike the least. If she does win, I honestly think she will have won legitimately. That said… I also don’t think she will win.

 

Baseless claims of election fraud worked soooo well in 2020.

 

Says who? Or at least someone stuffing for him. It's not been said one why or the other who the supposed ballots were for.

And yet no camera caught evidence has been brought forth.

 

This kind of stuff is always best supported with evidence. There are cameras everywhere including in everyone’s pocket. I would like to see evidence first.

 

Probably not. He doesn't need to actually direct them for them to do it. Not a claim that this case was by a Trump supporter stuffing votes for Trump. Just that he doesn't have to say anything for them to do it.

 

Situational evidence, hearsay and confidential informants are the lefts stock and trade.. Decades of conditioning have transformed American common sense into blind trust in those that manipulat and never tell the truth..

 

The judge will laugh you out of court.

 

Which has nothing to do with how votes are handled. The votes within a state still count, for now at least, in the determining of the electors going to the EC. Whether the votes are for the office direct or for an elector to the EC, the argument is still valid, and is separate from the issue of whether we should have an EC or not.

 

The EC adds an unnecessary complication.

 

its a check against fraud

 

No its not.

 

If the stuffer could maintain an incredible rate of five ballots every 3 seconds (not likely) it would still take 5 minutes. I live in the third world I and it wouldn't take 5 minutes to find someone with a camera on their phone.
Not even a good lie.

 

opinion noted, rejected as being contrary to reality

if a state allows lots of improper voters to vote-it might cost the non cheating party races in that state and the electoral college votes but it cannot determine the presidency assuming that one state's electoral votes are not determinative/ If the national election is based on a popular vote it could

pretty easy to understand

 

Reality says the EC was so slave states could benefit from slave populations even though they couldn't vote.

 

not relevant these days. Democrats want illegals since they count in the census

 

The STEAL is ON!

'With just four days to go until Election Day, Republican lawmakers are demanding answers from the Pentagon after receiving complaints about inadequate resources to help military service members vote.'

'Active duty service members claim the Pentagon has not allocated enough resources to let them cast their ballot on time and that the stockpile of write-in absentee ballots on at least one military base is depleted and has not been replenished, according to three GOP congressmen.'

'Rep. Brian Mast, R-Fla., Rep. Bill Huizenga, R-Mich. and Mike Waltz, R-Fla., penned a letter to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin on Wednesday, writing "with grave concern" about "deficiencies in the Defense Department’s protocols," which also includes not making service members aware of their options on how to vote.'

"Our nation’s brave men and women in uniform brought to our attention that there has been inadequate education at the administrative level on how to register to vote, request an absentee ballot, and fill in a federal write-in absentee ballot if their state-issued ballot does not arrive in time," the lawmakers write.

MAJORITY OF VETERANS POLLED SUPPORT RE-ELECTION OF DONALD TRUMP: 'WE WANT TRUMP BACK'

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/go...litary-voting-deficiencies-ahead-election-day

 

what did I say in that thread, think you have me confused with someone else, why do you think anyone would let you see pictures of "topless underage girls"

 

That is a separate point and issue. @yabberefugee 's point holds consistent whether the vote is going directly to the candidate or to an elector for the EC. That doesn't mean that I agree or disagree with his point. That is also irrelevant to what his point addresses.

 

No it's not. At most it is a check against larger states running roughshod over smaller states (population wise, not sq miles). But not against fraud.

 

I think that you need to provide some evidence on this.