The Supreme Court rules for a designer who doesn’t want to make wedding websites for gay couples

Look if you want to persist in claiming civil liability verdict is the same as a conviction-go ahead. It merely helps my side and my position to have you Trump haters demonstrate such incredible ignorance. Go ahead, you are a poster child for the Trump hating cult

 

There is no conviction in civil court, for the third time.

This is just embarrassing now...

 

I love it-it shows what the malignancy of Trump hating does to some people

 

Ah... the sweet sweet personal attacks. There is no hate in here by calling a spade a spade. The guy is a sexual predator, since he is being made to pay millions over a sexual assault by a normal court procedure.

The only problem we got is, is that you lot insist he did not do that just like you lot insist his elections were stolen.
it's like talking to a flat earther, who is furious the science isn't want he wants it to be.

 

Kind of like someone who makes five posts insisting someone was convicted of something they were never convicted of?

 

This is in response to Rebellion who stated the following:

"Democrats impose their beliefs as much as Republicans do. No difference in the Trump agenda than the Biden or Obama agendas. This is different than forcing you to perform an action or say something you do not believe in."

You can see he introduces the response to my comments about Trump as an analogy stereotyping all Democrats and Republicans to shift from Trump.

That is when I responded to his response to me and stated:

"First off I am talking about Trump. Stop deflecting and referring to Republicans.Trump is a fascist cult leader. To try claim he is no different than Biden or Obama is a joke. That is what I am talking about TRUMP. No he is not Mitt Romney or other Republicans who do not support him.

It was Rebellion not I who initiated the deliberate switch of reference trying to pose Trump as synonymous with all Republicans.

Then Rebellion responds and rather than acknowledge he tried to deflect from Trump by engaging in a stereotype of all Democrats and Republicans to avoid discussing Trump's agenda responds with this:

"Nice try at moving the goal posts. You said "The people who argue anti discrimination laws." A lot more people than Trump argue them."

I never claimed people other than Trump argue anti discrimination laws. I do make the point again Rebellion tries to avoid that it is MOST CERTAINTLY THE TRUMP AGENDA to have put in Judges that would reverse anti discrimination and right to abortion decisions. Rebellions attempt yet again to try deflect from the Trump agenda to revoke anti discriminatory laws speaks for itself in its clumsiness. I haven't changed any goal posts. I have consistently focused on the Trump Agenda that Rebellion is on this thread and others to cheer lead.

Next Rebellion exhibits classic Trump agenda by name calling and not discussing actual Trump policies (because he has none) when he states:

"I can't recall the Republicans putting a murderer or a child molester back in office like Kennedy or Stubbs.

That kind of sewage response is what I would argue typical of Trump agenda and here is what is so ironic-Rebellion seems to have amnesia:

In 2016, former Republican speaker of the House Dennis Hastert ⁠was convicted for trying to pay off men he had sexually abused as a high school wrestling coach.

Hastert’s legal team then compiled 41 letters in defense of his character from friends and former colleagues, including Republican congressmen David Dreier, Porter Goss, John Doolittle, Thomas Ewing, and the former Republican House majority whip Tom DeLay. “

Here is what Tom Delay said in his defence:

"We all have our flaws, but Dennis Hastert has very few,” ... “I ask that you consider the man that is before you and give him leniency where you can.”

source: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/mar/30/republicans-gop-party-children-abuse

So I suggest before tries to deflect and switch the goal posts from not being able to discuss the Trump agenda to trying to engage me in sewage comments he think again because it stops here.

Before Rebellion tries to engage me or anyone in accusations about the sexual behaviour of Democrats he should know Trump didn't just brag about grabbing ******* and forcing himself on women because he could get away with it, but he he is facing a trial over paying hush money to hide his sex behaviour and his defamation case does not make him look exactly credible to anyone but Rebellion desperately trying to deflect from Trump's sexual behaviour caught up in his political agenda.

Next I suggest if Rebellion wants to make accusations about anyone he provide specific examples and proof, not uncorroborated drivel.






I can't recall a Republican register dead people to get votes like Kennedy. I can't recall a Republican attorney general using their office to falsify information against a candidate in order to get their supporter elected.