The Trump Search Warrant

Outrageous! I believe club DNC has a patch for that, like boy scouts

 

If the record existed, there would have been no classified info to retrieve.

 

Yes, we will need to wait patiently to find out. Trump has been tried and convicted in the “court of public opinion”.
Years of unproven accusations have been touted by the opposition party and their many cohorts to negatively influence the “court of public opinion”.

I also, do not have faith in the anti-Trump magistrate. The FBI also has anti-Trump baggage from the past.

The Biden/Harris Administration slogan “Build Back Better” has not come to fruition and many Americans are suffering.

I think, this is a continuation of the opposition party and their cohorts plan to negatively influencing the “court of public opinion” against Trump.

To achieve their goal that some have actually stated in public… Take him out so so he can’t run for President in 2024.

 

Yes, the clock is ticking… TickTock goes the clock of Democrat desperation to “get” Trump.

 

A boogieman is always needed to hopefully distract the public from the negative realty they have currently created for overpowering we the peons into permanent submission.

 

If, that was the reason… did the agents wear masks to protect their identities?

 

No

 

That sure is a dumb-dumb if there ever was one…the Hidin’ masked candidate was the dumbest of them all put into that Office. imho

 

Mention of that unauthorized private server brings back a memory about an old bathroom closet… was that ever confirmed that the private server was hiding along with the in the bathroom closet? And in the same room with as the ?

 

Where else would you keep it but close to "wiping" paper?

 

Problem solved… don’t watch.

 

Oh i will keep watching pathetic people defend Trump.

People know they are lying, and still can't stop.

 

Of course keeping that special “wiping” paper close to the server was so useful…

That she decided it was worth a pantomime for all to see…how she used that “wiping”paper to wipe her hidden server! A pantomime!

 

Okay, that is your choice.

Is there a forum lie detector contraption available that I don’t know about? If, there is use it to stop all those liars.

https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/debate

Debate - noun a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal.

 

DOJ/FBI/AG raid was about trying to fix the 2024 election.

Not actually new:

"FBI in 1964: Investigated Goldwater at Pres. Johnson's instruction
FBI in 2016: Gave Hillary a "get out of jail free card" while framing Trump w/ RussiaGate
FBI in 2020: Had Hunter laptop, knew it had evidence of Biden corruption, instead helped circulate claim it was "disinfo"
FBI in 2022: Three months before midterms, agents conduct unprecedented raid on Trump, offering variety of conflicting explanations. Throughout Trump's presidency, they probed him for supposedly doing what they themselves are now doing virtually every election."

https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/202...why-citizens-should-be-pro-defunding-the-fbi/

 

Calling anyone a liar is a serious accusation. I would prefer to just say someone is mistaken instead of deliberately lying.

 

You fell for that lie? Yeah, not only is Trump ************ you, he's ************ you with the laziest, dumbest bullshit imaginable. The Feds DID ask. Trump didn't comply. Then they sent a SUBPOENA. Trump didn't comply.

 

Epstein Judge Rules That SOME Documents Supporting Trump Mar-a-Lago FBI Raid Will Be Released.

The Epstein Judge "who greenlit the" desperate "FBI raid on a former U.S. President" and leading 2024 presidential contender — "Donald Trump — has agreed to unseal and release some redacted documents that federal prosecutors used to justify the raid."

"The raid was so" intrusive "that investigators went through Melania Trump’s clothes, “leaving it a mess”' claiming, according to illicit DOJ leaks that they were searching her drawers for nuclear secrets, which of course, no one with a brain believes.



"Trump called for the release of the documents."

"The warrant was “overly broad” and “unconstitutional,” according to constitutional attorneys Alan Dershowitz, Robert Barnes, and others. Overly broad warrants are tantamount to “general warrants,” which are unconstitutional. The FBI essentially confirmed that its warrant wasn’t specific enough when it admitted to “over collecting” Trump’s belongings, including the former president’s old and new passports and attorney-client-privileged documents."

The DOJ has argued for complete secrecy even while they illicitly leak extensively.

"There’s reason to question the reliability of some of the evidence. The FBI and DOJ" has an illicit "system of selectively leaking to the media and using those stories as 'evidence' of the seriousness of the issue in their request for a warrant. It’s a continuous fake-news feedback loop of the kind we saw in the Russian collusion and Steele Dossier hoaxes. The method is simple: “The loop starts with FBI leaks to the media, the media report them, and the FBI uses the stories as ‘evidence’ in their warrant applications.” This illicit scheme is what will likely be in the documents that this Epstein judge keeps concealed.

"The public deserves a look at the information that a federal officer of the court is yet again" in an attempt to illegitimately rig the 2024 election.

Despite the lying leaks of the DOJ/FBI/AG neither "the documents nor their classifications were the issue in the case. The federal statutes involved don’t pertain to classified documents. Law professor Margot Cleveland also noted this and concluded that the feds" are using "the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)" which are not criminal statutes.

They are engaging in a rapidly collapsing seditious conspiracy to rig the 2024 election by trying to keep Trump off the ballot because they know that he will beat anyone that the Dems run against him.

 

Glad we both agree that the power hungry politicians are bent on another frenzied rampage to get Trump. It won't work.

 

Where have we seen this type of behavior before, CharisRose?

 

I agree… It won’t work.