The two reasons people are "pro-life"

I have observed two distinct types of people in the "pro-life" movement that's rampant today. Of course "pro life" is about as pro life as Bush's "healthy skies" plan was pro clean air. Most pro life people are rabidly for all forms of killing, torture and corruption, so life is obviously not important to them.

The first group of people that I have seen on a regular basis protesting against planned parenthood are basically losers that have pitiful lives, so they are bitter and taking it out against those that they see as "having fun" that they obviously don't.

The second group are people that are highly immoral and inhuman, IMO, so they need some great cause to feel like they are actually good people. This group includes people who support atrocities like bombing civilians, torture, corporate crimes, destroying the planet, etc.

Oh, and of course there are some that simply use the issue for political points, but I think this is a relatively small group.

 

Some people are pro-life because they believe it is wrong to take an innocent life.

 

So I guess pro abortion lobby loves to have sex and get pregnant to kill the baby, even though they hate war, torture and killing. Got it.

Actually, personally I am against abortion as a form of birth control, responsibility should be practiced. I am also against most war, most forms of torture, and the death penalty, so personally your thread is a huge fail.

Besides, are liberals so shallow to think that the only thing fun in life is sex?

 

So little tiny microscopic cells are considered a "life" now?

 

It is the funnest thing in life, lol. But on a serious note who the (*)(*)(*)(*) cares about a woman choosing to have an abortion. Why do you want children in this country born in to people who do not want to take care of them? It's not like you guys want to take care of other peoples children for them.

You guys are sick in the head!!

 

Until you kill them, the answer is obviously yes.

 

Cells are alive and as such it is life. It may not be a baby, however it is still life.

Some people believe that it is life and as such you should respect their opinion instead of grouping them all together with some who like war and what not.

 

No, you obviously didn't read my post. Most of these "pro-life" people are all for killing animals, bombing everyone outside of America, torture, shooting intruders (ok i can support that one) and every other form of anti-life imaginable, so don't try to tell us that they give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about life.

 

Please show facts that most of these pro-life people support those things.

Also, killing animals I assume you mean animal testing? If so, that benefits humanity. While it may be cruel to the animals, it helps us, which is understandable. As for bombing people, they believe it makes us safer (which it actually doesn't). Torture can help us get information from terrorist which can help stop and prevent terrorist attacks potentially saving lives. Shooting intruders does not mean killing, it means protecting your family and possessions from a thief.

Pro-life is about saving an innocent life from abortion.

 

And some people believe it is NOT life and as such you should respect THEIR opinion instead of calling them evil, immoral babykillers and murderers.

The same people who call Liberals babykillers and murderers supported the Iraq invasion where tens of thousands of women - some pregnant - and children were blown to bits. The DU we drenched the country in causes such horrible birth defects that most Iraqi women are given ultrasounds to be sure they aren't giving birth to horribly deformed babies. The cancer rate has risen some 600-700% and most of it is leukemia in children.

How many pro-lifers would object to abortion if they knew they were going to give birth to a child like this?

WARNING - GRAPHIC

http://mindprod.com/politics/iraqdubabiespix.html

 

There is not a life there. It is a grouping of cells. Based on this logic men should not be able to masturbate because they are killing little babies every time they do.

 

I do, where have I called them evil, immoral babykillers murderers?

I am pro-choice and pro-life. I believe nobody should have an abortion, but do not feel it is the government's right to forbid somebody from having an abortion.

 

I should have said "they" instead of "you". I would never have one myself but I want the option for my daughters and granddaughters and anybody else whose personal circumstances might cause them to consider one. There ARE legitimate reasons for doing so and every woman should have the right to decide that for themselves.

 

Just so you know I am both pro-life and pro-choice. I am just arguing the pro-life side since the OP was quite rude trying to say that pro-life people are hypocrites and support murder.

Masturbation is different, once conception occurs it is in my opinion life and as such an abortion would be killing what would become a baby. With masturbation conception does not occur and as such you are not killing what would become a life.

Life is different from human-hood. In my opinion there is life once conception occurs, however it is not a human until it can survive outside the woman.

 

Ahh, sorry about that.

And yes, woman should have the right to decide if they want an abortion. In my opinion they should not unless it is life threatening, however it is not the governments right to stop a woman from having an abortion and as such I am fine with woman having an abortion.

 

Every right winger on this forum, for example, supports war, torture, and shooting animals as well as they want to bankrupt the old and poor people in America which will certainly cause deaths (I don't consider RP voters right-wingers)

 

Of course you have nothing to back up your stupid assertions.

 

By that logic it is sick in the head to call it murder if parents decide to kill their children at any age. Why would you want children alive in this country living with people who do not want to take care of them? It is not like we want to take care of others' children.

 

By this logic you are making the assumption a group of cells is equivalent to a full born child. That's like apples and oranges. People should just not have sex since any time a male ejaculates he is killing unborn babies!!

 

What about six, seven, or eight months into a pregnancy?

 

Stupid to say that right-wingers support war and torture and bankrupting Americans? If you could find one that doesn't maybe you'd have a point.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...eered-idea-of-letting-uninsured-patients-die/

 

I'm not talking about 6-8 months. The child is fully formed by then and an abortion should not be legal. I'm talking about things like birth control, morning after pills, and immediate abortions.

 

Yawn, your blanket statements suck, as does your thread.

 

Attacking the messenger because you can't refute his statements is hardly worthwhile. I bet you can't name even one pro-lifer who doesn't support war.

 

Ron Paul is on record as being pro-life, though he clarifies that it's the job of the states, not the job of Congress, to outlaw it. He also opposed the wars in both Afghanistan and Iraq.

pwned.