What do you know? There’s still hope for the US Senate when a senator like Oklahoma’s James Inhofe calls out a major manmade global warming fraud: More importantly, at long last the UN’s environmental engineering is being dragged out into the open by a high-ranking elected official. I cannot recall ever hearing a member of Congress nail the UN in so definitive a way. In fact, I cannot recall any serious criticism of the UN other than clucking disapproval whenever scandals like Oil-For-Food erupted. Even then UN-protectors called for reforming the United Nations rather than withdrawing. Inhofe did not call for withdrawal, but he sure started the ball rolling. NOTE: Anyone who is unfamiliar with that foul organization probably will not realize how big of a deal Inhofe’s courage is. To take on the UN is to take on all of the most powerful forces driving the global government movement; forces in finance, in media, and in the government itself are more formidable that average Americans can imagine. Will the death of Cap & Trade be enough to trigger shutting down the EPA? It’s possible once you realize the EPA does the UN’s dirty work in this country. The UN is anti-America so it follows that the EPA is also anti-America. Put it this way: The apple does not fall far from the tree. Finally, this message also fits in the Law & Justice forum and the Environment & Conservation forum. I chose history because the UN began in 1945. You can even say it began with Woodrow Wilson’s failed League of Nations. Inhofe: Cap and trade is 'dead, gone, forever' Says climate-change skeptics have won debate over global warming Published: 7 hours ago (DAILY CALLER) — Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe, the ranking Republican member of the Environment and Public Works committee, told The Daily Caller on Monday that climate change skeptics have won the debate over global warming on Capitol Hill. “We’ve won the fight because there’s no way in the world they could pass through legislation a cap and trade bill,” Inhofe said, referring to proposed laws that would limit carbon emissions. “It’s dead, gone, forever.” Inhofe, the author of “The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Your Future,” says that he initially believed claims that humans were responsible for climate change. But after reviewing the science behind the claim, Inhofe now says he believes that the theory is a lie, and that the United Nations is largely responsible for promoting it. “The history goes back to 1972 when this whole thing started,” Inhofe said. “And who was it? It wasn’t Al Gore. It wasn’t MoveOn.org. It was the United Nations.” http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/inhofe-cap-and-trade-is-dead-gone-forever/
Im not certain what Newt meant by disassemble? He added: Gingrich bashes EPA in Alaska conference call by Matt Buxton/mbuxton@newsminer.com Fairbanks Daily News Miner Feb 29, 2012 http://newsminer.com/bookmark/17703871-Gingrich-bashes-EPA-in-Alaska-conference-call Disassemble can mean take apart and put it back together; i.e., replace it. I get antsy when politicians play with words. I would have a bit more faith in Newt had he said he would shutdown the EPA rather than trade it in for a new model. And lets not forget this: Gingrich was for the United Nations before he was against it Posted By Josh Rogin Thursday, August 11, 2011 - 5:13 PM http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/p...r_the_united_nations_before_he_was_against_it I should add that dividing the delegates among the four wannabes so that no candidate goes to the convention with the nomination locked up is where conservatives should be at today. Gingrich offers a good reason to throw some delegates his way. Maybe at the convention hell say shutdown rather than disassemble and replace? At least thats what hell say if he wants conservatives to support him.
