The vagina demagogues.....liberal feminism

Discussion in 'Women's Rights' started by Libhater, Dec 9, 2012.

  1. Libhater

    Libhater Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    12,500
    Likes Received:
    2,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Feminists demand apologies over insults to women they like, but drag their heels if the victim herself isn't part of the feminist brood. In a strange kind of mental contortionism, the concept of tolerance demands that you accept intolerant slander.

    And this slander is spewing from people who, by proclaiming themselves feminists, get the FFP (Feminist Free Pass) is the most insidious form of tolerance: as long as you toe the progressive line, you can be a FOP (a Full-on-Pig). The most obvious offender was Bill Clinton, who proved that as long as you accept all the feminist tenets, you can treat women who aren't your wife as receptacles for your errant, undisciplined sperm. If you're a progressive, you can be the Johnny Appleseed of sexual conquest--from randy politicians like Teddy Kennedy, to celebrities who speak about women's rights while banging drugged-up teens in hot tubs (see Roman Polanski).

    Let us not forget America's favorite rapist, Mike Tyson, who on ESPN radio brought down the house one day with his cogent analysis of what it would be like to manhandle Sarah Palin.

    We won't quote the maniac in full, because it's gross. On the program, the hosts nimbly brought up a rumor about Palin. The conversation turned toward the wholesome, as Tyson figured Palin needed a stronger lover. He's like a therapist! With a rape conviction!

    My point: imagine, if you will, a conservative athlete had said the same thing about, say, Michelle Obama, or Nancy Pelosi, or Hillary Clinton. Everyone at ESPN would have been fired. Especially since most of them were guffawing like pimply-faced teens in homeroom. But we can forgive them, for their hearts are in the right place. They're libs. And so, instead, here in the primordial slime that spawned Keith Olberman, they got a pass. Modern tolerance dictates that a liberal--even one that was convicted of rape like Tyson--gets away with this muck because his target is so reviled for being who she is. And who is she? Just a conservative chick who dared challenge their annoited flag-bearer, Barack Obama.

    If Larry Flynt was a conservative, it would be perfectly acceptable to make light of his paralysis--he was shot, and now gets around town sunk in an expensive electric wheelchair. But since the man--famous for a cover featuring a nude woman dropped in a blender--is for women's rights (I'm fairly certain that boils down to letting chicks degrade themselves in Hustler), he's now a folk hero with an Oscar-nominated movie about him. The great thing about tolerance: You can create the most vile pornography on the planet, and Hollywood will fall at your feet--in the name of.....tolerance! Hence, he can get away with saying this about Palin and her disabled child:

    [Palin] did a disservice to every woman in America. She knew from the first month of pregnancy that kid was going to be Down's syndrome. It's brain dead. A virtual vegetable. She carries it to all these different political events against abortion; she did it just because she didn't want to say she'd had an abortion. How long is it going to live? Another twelve, fifteen years? Doesn't even know it's in this world. So what kind of compassionate conservative is she? I don't think anybody will want her near the White House.

    You have to admit, it's staggering seeing a vegetable calling someone else a vegetable. If Larry Flynt had come across Larry Flynt after the shooting, he woud have smothered him with a pillow. So why does a legendary pervert who once had sex with a chicken (it's in his memoir) see fit to say such things? Because he can. A champion of FFP and a victim of LBSS (or Liberal Blind Spot Syndrome), he has lost all context of what's considered appropriate language about women and children.

    Excerpts from the book "The Joy of Hate" by Greg Gutfeld

    ps: The lesson I hope you libs and feminists alike take from this post is that liberal tolerance only happens when its tolerance of another liberal, but it quickly changes to liberal intolerance when its a conservative in question. Same thought process goes when critiquing women; liberal tolerance is acceptable when allowing Bill Clinton to rape women, but liberal intolerance is quite acceptable when bashing conservative women like Sarah Palin.
    :shh: :shh:
     
  2. JavisBeason

    JavisBeason New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    14,996
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    this will be dismissed as sexist.....

    lol

    liberals are hypocrits, they know it, but they dont care so long as it promotes whatever agenda they are pushing.....be it feminism, racism, gay rights, whatetever

    i come to this subsection of the fprum because i like to break up the circle-jerk of regulars on here that post crap like...... "racism/sexism/gay-ism is bad.....and if you dont agree, youre a sexist/racist/homophobe.
     
  3. Libhater

    Libhater Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    12,500
    Likes Received:
    2,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Of course the irony is that its the liberals and feminists who are responsible for nitpicking every perceived social injustice by blaming Conservatives or older white people for all of our racial and or societal ills, when in reality its the progressives, affirmative action advocates, quotas, community organizing redistribution advocates, guilty white liberal males, feminists, socialists and multiculturalists who are destroying our once strong, moral and proud nation on a daily basis.
     
  4. Nanninga

    Nanninga Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2010
    Messages:
    675
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    A good example is the rape allegation made against Assange. I find the allegation ridiculous, but Michael Moore who otherwise supports feminist and hate speech against White men the loudest outcried for Julian Assange. He would celebrate every normal man going to jail for the same allegation (for information, the so called rape victim never claimed to be raped, was just angry that he did not use a condom and wanted an HIV test; the Swedish auhtorities decided after her question that she was raped).

    Political correctness in any facette if its feminism or something else is based on an ideology filled by the hate of White men.
     
  5. Libhater

    Libhater Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    12,500
    Likes Received:
    2,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So correct, and along with these hate filled feminists are their hate filled liberal co conspirators be it males or females.
     
  6. Libhater

    Libhater Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    12,500
    Likes Received:
    2,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So correct, and along with these hate filled feminists are their hate filled liberal co conspirators be it males or females.
     
  7. aussiefree2ride

    aussiefree2ride New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    4,529
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, Lefties envy the affluence and independance of successful people.
    Feminist Lefties envy people`s success, and their dicks.
     

Share This Page