This anti-black justice is black and corrupt, Clarence Thomas

I thought blacks wanted to bring back segregation.

 

They did, and then started crying over the loss of good ole WHITEY tax dollars. Happened recently in Lousiana

 

Why don't you want to address the topic? Why do you keep trying to make this personal instead of just addressing the issue? Can't discuss the issue, so have to result to insults and off topic rantings?

Anyways, Justice Thomas is a victim of democrat party simply for thinking for himself. It's quite shameful. The more I think about it, I'm not sure I can identify a single black person that democrats treat with dignity and respect that votes non democrat.

 

It's quite simple. Democrats hate black people who don't vote democrat. Haven't found a single counter example yet.

 

I forgot to finish that sentence, it was supposed to say "bragg's district", not "bra".
OOPS
I was so shocked by hearing that black people should fall in line behave differently just because of their color (IN 2024) that I got thrown off balance.

 

Can you think of a single black person who is vocal about bad democrat policies that the left likes?

 

Maybe Kurtis (50 Cent) Jackson

 

Na they sent the dogs after him.

 

I think calling it "ruling against his race" is some serious SPIN. The OP was referencing the abortion ruling from what I recall, which I personally think was a dumb ruling, but then you try to race hustle that into "he voted against blacks".
Why?
That provided an inconvenience to ALL women of ALL colors that are in states that have strict abortion guidelines.
Again, there is zero point to make it about RACE, maybe economic class, but sure as heck not race.
Search your feelings, you know it to be true.

 

You're being unnecessarily pedantic argumentative and weasely. give it a rest already,

 

No I'm being precise and precision has it that you are projecting, and, as such, your comment has no argumentative value.

If you want a more blunt statement you haven't said anything

 

Nope just pedantic and weasely. Our definitions differ you don't like mine I find yours little more than a pathetic excuse for murder. And as you already pointed out until the courts sort it out we can each pick our own definition.

 

If you have a counter argument to the OP, offer it.

I don't have time for your snark. Let me know.

 

Its not Marshall's seat. Marshall is dead, its Thomas' seat now. FFS

 

Nice cop out.

This is precise, and you have failed to produce an intelligent counter argument to the following

The SCOTUS has made no ruling on the personhood of fetuses.

ACCURATE.

Until then, [calling fetuses] 'babies' is incorrect.

ACCURATE. Calling a fetus a 'baby' is an appeal to emotion, not to fact.

All organic matter from a human is human, including spermatozoa and unfertilized eggs, but no one knows when the 'person' begins, that [personhood] can only be determined [ decided ] by judicial degree, not by science for it is the domain of philosophy.

ACCURATE (in a broad sense)

I'm using language that is precise, and if you can't understand it, that's on you.

Your response contains nothing to counter the claim made, only ad homs, which are logical fallacies.

 

Sure, he has been on the seat a number of years longer than Marshall. But.....

You don't need to lawyer such an innocuous point -- mainly because the only reason I mentioned it is to reveal the contrast between the two who were both black where Thomas took the seat that Marshall left. That it IS Thomas's is more of a red herring to the point I was making.

 

You already have it. You chose to ignore it.

 

By your own statement they have not ruled you don't get it your own way just yet until they do rule one way or the other your statement is no more accurate than mine because judicially it is undecided. Though as a matter of fact someone kills a mother and the child in her womb the killer can face two counts of murder instead of one so in essence at least under certain circumstances a child and the womb is a person.

 

I saw no substantive counter.

Feel free to prove otherwise.

 

Fetal homicide laws vary from state to state, but the fact remains that SCOTUS has yet to decide that a fetus is a person with all the rights inherent in the bill of rights.

Thing is, such laws are to ascribe a more serious penalty to a murderer, as in, why not shoot for two crimes? Why not? he's a murderer, with two we can put him away longer, which, in my view, is the motivation more so than fetal homicide laws are recognition of a fetus as a person with 'rights'. Only a SCOTUS decision can make it so, which would mean a woman committing abortion is a murderer. And the SC hasn't taken it that far and they had the opportunity with Dobbs, but didn't (in my view, it was too big of a hot potato, so the relegated it to they states). A few states have, the ultra right wing states.

If SCOTUS had ruled a fetus is a 'person', from inception, I sincerely believe they knew that republicans wouldn't win the presidency for a long long time, and that is the reason they didn't. But I'm quite positive Alito wanted to.

 

Nor have they decided it is not. Except of course in the previously stated case.

 

I find it truly disgusting when pro-choicers try and frame the baby as non-human
Super disgusting!
Just admit you support abortion, I do! and by the way, it is 100% A HUMAN BEING

 

He consistently rules based on what he believes the law is and how it should be interpreted, regardless of race. I’m sorry a black man doesn’t think the way you demand him to think, but that’s not a racial problem on his end. That’s a racial perception problem on the accuser’s side. It’s okay for black people to think how they want to think without negative stereotypes and judgement being cast on them with unveiled insults of being a race traitor.

The purpose of the Civil Rights movement was to treat people as individuals with the same respect and rights as everyone else. This is the opposite of what you are doing. You’re lumping all Black people together and demanding they think the way you want them to think. There’s a word that describes this mentality, but I can’t quite put my finger on it.

 

Labeling them as race traitors and uncle toms is how they keep their blacks in line but thanks to Trump, they are finally breaking those chains and I feel we have the left to thank for it. GOOD JOB GUYS!

 

Thomas is very conservative. Sotomayor is very liberal. Sometimes that's the way the cookie crumbles.
Noone on the Supreme Court should receive any gift from anyone. Period. Same for all politicians. Thomas made a bad decision. I condemn him for it.
I worked for a large company and ordered supplies from various other companies. When their salespeople were in town, they always invited me to lunch. I accepted but made it clear I would pay for my own lunch. It was a company policy.