This nurse says she saw the covid vaccine causing injuries

This slam-dunk post is rolled off the current page. Apparently North California isn't subject to the same data as the rest of the US!

Hey look everyone, during the actual main rollout in January, all cause mortality is plummeting!

But of course the "whistleblower can't be making it up to a briefed script covering EVERY covid conspiracy in one speech.

 

And again more personal attacks.

 

Post explains data.

Ignored the post completely

Simple question

Question evaded.

Pointing out question being avoided.

Spam. Avoiding the question again.

Spam. Kindly answer the post.

Nb. Viewers can look back on this thread and see maybe 20 posts avoided in similar fashion.

 

Why is the data from Northern California so different from the government and vaccine industry sources? You personally attack the whistleblower nurse whose testimony is the exact opposite of what you claim disregarding the fact that 1200 nurses and other health care worker chose losing their jobs instead of exposing themselves to the effects of the vaccines which they had observed first hand at their respective hospitals. Move along - nothing to see here.

 

It is exactly as happened. YOU are falsely attributing opinions of 1200 people when you have been given 3 or 4 reports showing not one single agreement to her claims! You ignored all the reports.

It's also a rather non objective conclusion to suggest you know the reason why these 1200 didn't have the vaccine. You were given studies on THAT as well showing the main reasons given! None were due to any so called "first hand expetience"! You ignored those studies.

 

I believe the people who confirmed what they saw through their actions by giving up their jobs. I do not believe the reports compiled by biased sources with financial interests in the outcomes and data which is not representative of what actually occurred. Why were health care professionals instructed not to fill out VAERS paperwork when adverse reactions occurred after injections?

 

The viewers can look at it and see that you're wrong.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ausing-injuries.621607/page-7#post-1075018302

I don't see much point in going back and forth like this. The viewers have see it and can come to their own conclusions.

 

Oh do pay attention! Here's my post!

The US data in the actual link provided!

 

I was responding to post #167. Please comment on it.


This other graph is confusing.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ausing-injuries.621607/page-7#post-1075018231

What are all the grey lines for besides the one you pointed to on the right?

There's something else I'm missing. The bottom shows months in order but what year is that supposed to be? Sorry for being slow to understand that graph.

 

That is really all you need to know. The nurses who have first hand knowledge and seen the actual ill effects of the TOXIC crap being administered via a syringe, said thanks, but no thanks to the lab-created bio-weapon disguised as a manufacturing "miracle" called "Operation Warped Speed".....

 

NO YOU WERE NOT! You quoted post 171 and it is easy to follow, just click the arrow and it shows where the quote came from.

No it isn't. It's as easy and straightforward as a graph could be.

I didn't point to ANY grey lines. The text above them indicates 10 years pre covid mortality, from which excess mortality is estimated. Can you not see the text on the right with an arrow pointing to one of the grey lines?

"Pre-COVID 19 (April 1,2010 to March 31, 2020)"

See the orange line? See the text on the left "COVID 19 (April 1,2020 to March 31, 2021)"

Vaccine rollout began in earnest in January and over a month the spike tails off. I am not claiming correlation, merely that the damn vaccine OBVIOUSLY hasn't caused any excess mortality!

 

And nobody in their right mind should.

 

Uhuh. Thanks for sharing, bare assertion doesn't work in debate.

Uhuh. Thanks for sharing, bare assertion doesn't work in debate. Neither does denial of peer reviewed documents correlated by numerous data suppliers.

They weren't. Who told you they were? Surely you aren't going to take the word of somebody quoting the entire antivax playbook in one speech?

False. Right minded people like evidence. The account of somebody with a large axe to grind who just happens to have "noticed" every single covid conspiracy all going on in her hospital is way, way suspect. That with a couple of dozen rebuttals that show she is clearly not telling the truth should convince anyone in their right mind. Oh, and it's not a personal attack to label someone a liar when the evidence shows she clearly is. It is however a little biased to believe her verbatim in the face of a torrent of data and evidence.

 

Betamax...

Please respond to post #182 which is a response to post #167..
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ausing-injuries.621607/page-7#post-1075018302

 

You totally misquoted that post. That comment doesn't refer to 167 at all! You are commenting on a post with a statement made on another!

YOU respond to the post you just quoted with the corrections! A total slam-dunk.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ausing-injuries.621607/page-8#post-1075018539

 

I did make a mistake. This is the quote I meant to post in post #182.

Please respond to it.

There's an arrow pointed at the top grey line. I thought you'd put it there. Anyway I still don't know what the other grey lines are for.

I'm still confused about the graph. What are the dates, including the years, of the starting time on the left and the ending time on thje right?

 

How can ANYONE dispute this? The blue line is 3/4 up the first small yellow spike before it even starts rising. The first major blue spike is BEFORE the large yellow one and CLEARLY is tailing off while the major yellow spike is in action.

 

Still waiting for anyone to explain why the US rollout has no mortality spike!

 

There have been plenty of accurate assertions in this and many other threads.

 

But your response is gibberish it refers to a quote not relevant to that image! It doesn't reflect what I posted!

What!? I just explained it to you! There are 10 thin grey lines denoting pre covid mortality.
The text above them indicates 10 years pre covid mortality, from which excess mortality is estimated. Can you not see the text on the right with an arrow pointing to one of the grey lines?

"Pre-COVID 19 (April 1,2010 to March 31, 2020)"

10 years of data, 10 little grey lines.

How can you be confused?

See the orange line? See the text on the left "COVID 19 (April 1,2020 to March 31, 2021)"

Now answer the post properly!
Vaccine rollout began in earnest in January and over a month the spike tails off. I am not claiming correlation, merely that the damn vaccine OBVIOUSLY hasn't caused any excess mortality!

 

That's not what I see.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ausing-injuries.621607/page-7#post-1075018268

The viewers can decide for themselves.

This part still confuses me. So each line is one year long? The bottom grey line is for 2010 and top one for 2020? Is that what they mean? I've never seen a graph that puts different years in the same year-long graph without labeling the lines to make it clear.

 

Why do you believe there wasn’t? There was one in Northern California.

 

Ridiculous. You are denying something as clear as could be!
Yeah "viewers" - click the link!
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ausing-injuries.621607/page-7#post-1075018268

A spam statement that is damn obvious. I don't believe you don't see this.

<Sigh>

Of course!

Irrelevant, but probably! It's used to show how the excess mortality is very close year on year by reference!

And I HAVE actually seen this level of evasion numerous times before and just in this thread!

May "the viewers" and I have a reply to the points you have been asked to respond to half a dozen times now?
Vaccine rollout began in earnest in January and over a month the spike tails off. I am not claiming correlation, merely that the damn vaccine OBVIOUSLY hasn't caused any excess mortality!

Hey @Scott Clearly the USA data SPIKE is before the vaccine rollout!

 

The insurance actuaries showed excess mortality right after the vaccine rollout. The data was shown and was discussed in another thread.

 

The viewers have seen this so deny all you want.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ausing-injuries.621607/page-6#post-1075018053

You're not fooling anybody.

You're ignoring the above. I think most viewers have seen those graphs by now so you're destroying your credibility by denying the obvious.