Tonight Tucker Carlson discusses Obama's 'Pride'

Fatback, it is not homosexuality that is being criticized here. It is the source. A convicted con man, a professional liar throughout his life, who is making an allegation with no proof and no evidence whatsoever. This whole thing is part of the culture war, and the implication is that the Democratic Party are in love with gays and are "gay" quite literally, not a real man argument. That type of argument was very common in the 1970s, 80s, 90s, and even the 2000s. But now being gay is accepted, generally in society. You have log cabin Republicans, aka Gay Republicans, among other groups. It is like believing Charles Manson who said he never killed anyone.

With Trump, Trump did have affairs. One of the most public affairs of Trump was with Marla Maples in the late 1980s to the 1990s when he was married to Ivana Trump. But he has had more affairs than Bill Clinton. What was being criticized is the fact that Republicans, when Bill Clinton's love life and his affairs were being exposed, was that Republicans always voted for people who had moral values which included not having affairs. It appears the GOP has done a complete 180 and don't care if a Republican has an affair, but god forbid if a Democrat does. Hence the irony and the lies being exposed by the GOP leadership, which you are following lock, stock, and barrel, pun intended.

 

Nobody has a problem with Trump having an affair. There is a problem, however, with the "family values" and evangelical crowd attacking any politician from the liberal side for having an affair (or even inventing affairs, when there are none, like with Obama), while at the same time overlooking any moral deficiencies in their savior (Trump), or other politicians they presume are on their side (Moore, Sanford, Giuliani, Gingrich...). On the other hand, Dem politicians, like Spitzer, Weiner, Edwards, Cuomo, Franken, have lost their seats over their moral transgressions. Now, which party is the one with "family values" again?

 

So much for "Trump porn"! Trump can't hold a candle to Barack the Butt Crack.
Will Biden order the White House painted in pride colors?

People are just fine insulting 80 million Catholics, and 86 million Trump voters, and "frame-up" victim Trump himself, and yet you defend your own Gay Jesus, Obama as is he is the second coming.
I suggest you direct your rage to the corrupt media rotting democrat brains with impunity.

 

Well, the White House was lit up in "pride colors" during pride month this year and you guy went bonkers, quite literally. And pride month was well before this story came out.

The Catholic Church, as an organization, kept the numerous child sex by priests secret, even from authorities from here to places like Ireland and France where Catholics is the most dominant Christian sect. It is now, with Pope Francis, that the church is beginning to reconcile with the victims. Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict still tried to keep this a secret, especially the details from the public, even denying that priests did such a thing when the allegations were first coming true.

Second, I am not defending Obama here. I am merely pointing out the inconvenient truth that the person making these allegations is a convicted con man, on multiple occasions I might add. He does have a rap sheet, and yet, with no proof or evidence whatsoever. It is simply a part of the culture war that Tucker is waging, that being gay is unacceptable without really stating it, among other things.

As for Jesus, Jesus is neither conservative nor liberal. But if you look at his life, who is associated with in those days, it would be the equivelant of illegal aliens, prostitutes, gays, and any and every group you despise as a conservative. You may want to think about that.

 

There are only 62 million Catholics in the US. Second, NOBODY is insulting them and Trump voters, definitely not the poster you replied to. Pointing out their hypocrisy when it comes to "family values" is NOT an insult, even though you may perceive it as such.

 

Progressives are quick to rage on their enemies, and quicker to circle the wagons around their foes.
Phony is as phony does.

 

You say this in a thread about an lying media conman interviewing another conman in order to rage on their enemies . . . and their fans are circling their wagons around their foes.

 

Oh I'm pretty sure Joe prefers women (especially their hair - kinky, I know) if that was your mistaken point.
No, I was referring to someone named Tara Reade whose "P$$$$$" [too many $'s?] she claimed Joe grabbed ”against their [her] will”

 

Who here did you believe? Never mind we already know.

 

Well, you could actually look at my post history . . . where I supported the investigations into the Reade allegations. I'm also fine with the investigations into the Jones allegations. Sinclair is a proven fraudster being interviewed by another fraudster, so I don't put much stock here.