Trans Athlete Severely Injures Girls Volleyball Player With Spike — District Forfeits Games For Girl

They were asexual spikes, I believe.

 

lol
Biology is like we got a deadly virus out there.
Science is acknowledgment of that virus, and enters the realm to combat that biological little problem.

And you're flat out denying that science with still nothing to back it up.

 

but pseudoscience is pretending that a few hormone injections over here will magically make a man into a woman.

No I'm denying pseudoscience. I don't have to back it up it's pseudoscience you have to back it up.

 

you got no source backing up my science/source is pseudoscience.
Hence you lost the argument

 

You have no source. This source you posted insisted on ridiculous pseudoscience.

If I lost the argument why do you have to keep trying to convince me that I lost the argument?

If it's true you shouldn't have to do that.

 

I sourced what a total lack of testosteron does to a body,... ages ago.


It's just your opinion that it's pseudoscience, but you got nothing backing it up.
It's like reading a facebook post of my very demented granny.

 

that doesn't really have any bearing on this we're not talking about people with endocrine problems.

then why do you keep crying about it?

 

bla bla...
you still got no source saying my scientific research is "pseudoscience".

 

Yes I do, biology.

If this isn't just an utterly devastating argument there's no need for you to respond if you do I'll take it as you are full of it when you declare yourself the winner of the debate.

 

There's no such thing as asexual people. They come in either male or female or the very rare occasion they're hermaphroditic.

Asexual identity means nothing like most sexual identities.

 

No you do not

I already proved that through science, you can overcome the biological obstacle.
You called it pseudoscience. But you failed to prove this.

 

LOL Yes I do.

you're shifting the burden of proof. I don't have to prove your flat Earth crap wrong you have to prove it correct.

Linking to some website where other people claim the Earth is flat isn't good enough.

 

The burden on proof was on me, and I proved it with a source.
Now it's indeed on you to debunk it with a source.
At this point it's clear you're unable and or unwilling.
Hence you lost the argument.

 

then there shouldn't be anything left to talk about why do you insist on responding to me now Weeks later?

I feel no need to disprove or debunk the absurd.

The only person you're trying to convince is yourself.

But you're continued participation in responses to me I clearly didn't lose the argument because here you are still arguing about it.

If you believed your source proved your asinine belief then that would be it you would have stopped after that my disagreement with this idea causes existential angst because you know it's not true so that I really lose the argument?

 

So I proved that transgenders are perfectly able to compete fairly.

You capitulated because you can not and will not debunk it.
Your opinion on this matter is like hearing an Iranian Ayatollah.
It just rants on, but my source stands.

 

you can't prove that it's like proving the Earth is flat.

debunking the absurd doesn't make much sense.

Sources proving the Earth is flat do not stand they never will.

 

I have proved it! lol

nope. It's science. And your comparison is not a fact, it's just your opinion.

 

You can't it's preposterous.

Demanding that people accept preposterous nonsense as science is not an argument.

 

But I have

You're free to debunk it, but you capitulated.

 

You can't it's preposterous.

debunk the idea that men magically transform into women if they take hormone suppressants for a couple of months?

It's self debunking.

 

That it's "preposterous" is still your silly opinion vs my source.

It's not transforming men into women. It's transforming men in such a way that they can compete against women on a fair and equal level..... and you're just unwilling to accept it due to your religious/cultural indoctrination.

 

You can't source this is preposterous

Oh so not excepting the preposterous is because of some grand conspiracy.

Yeah flat Earth people say the same thing.

 

If it was like "preposterous" and "flat Earth people", you would have found a source disputing my source. But you haven't. It so far is just your silly little opinion.

Hence my scientific source stands and not your opinion = you've lost the argument.

 

Noah is doing such what indicate that your source is legitimate. What you do is blow it off when it's not legitimate.

I won't because it's not legitimate.

You keep telling me over and over and over again but you keep going back on it by continuing to argue with me.

If you respond to me after this post I will take that to mean you were mistaken when you told me that I lost the argument. If you believed that you wouldn't be arguing with me

 

it's still a lot of bla bla.
It remains so I proved my point with scientific research, and you presented against that just your silly dumb backward opinion.
And THAT'S why you lost the argument.

Do note. You would react the same way if you could source that you're right with a scientific source and I just had a different opinion. It's all that shallow.