Trump has stopped these muslims from entering the US http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38783512 And why would you want them? The biased BBC report calls the "Refugees". They are not Refugees at all. They are economic migrants! The report clearly states that they have left Syria and are now resident in Jorden. So they are not fleeing a war zone. The last I heard Jorden was at peace, a muslim Country and one that sould keep these muslims in there own land. A full veiled muslim women is the best propoganda picture that Trump could ask for. I live in Europe & I know full well the effects of mass muslim immigration, so does 1400 young girls from Rotherham & many women from many cities across Europe. So for the love of God America, don't let these people into your Country!
What a crock. I note that he has not stopped Muslim refugees / immigrants from those Muslim countries he does business with and they are the ones primarily responsible for the 9/11 attacks.
Granny says, "Dat's right... grandma: ... dey put filters on cigarettes, don't dey?... ... so's alla bad stuff gets filtered out... ... dat's all Trump tryin' to do here.
Yes! Ban the Saudis as well. I'd like to see at least another dozen countries included in the ban. Expand the ban, don't limit to muslims.
You mean those countries that heavily invested into Hillary's campaign and put even more money into Clinton's foundation in order to gain favourable treatment? I guess they invested wisely. Nothing to do with his business, everything to do with democrats and republicans who are paid by Saudis and Qataris to pursue their agenda instead of protecting the best interest of the USA. It's more like McCain, Graham, other neocons and their allies on the democrats side are protecting people who are paying them.
"Those fleeing Syria as refugees are banned until further notice." How many US, Russian and British soldiers have died to clear ISIS out of Syria? These able bodied so called refugees ran away from the fight, and now the fighting has been done for them and it's reasonably safe to go home they want to stay in Europe and the US forever. They like the free house and money. They have no need to claim refugee status, they can return home. Now. And as a side note this isn't a new thing. The only thing different in this case was the lack of massive protests. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/22/usa
That of course was immediately protested by the British Government. There is though a difference between random bans which yours was and which are bad enough and the group banning of people simply because of who they are, although of course the previous ban was during a republican 'war on terror' which is the reason we now have all these refugees needing refuge and for which the US has its responsibilities https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2017/jan/29/donald-trump-us-travel-ban-refugees-airports Even some Republicans are protesting this taking away of people's rights due to people's identity same link. A Scottish woman only got home due to the £2,600 (a month of her wages) which the Scottish people collected in half an hour on line for her and as I said in another thread talks are beginning to come out of Iraq on expelling American's. The British view seems to be hardening after May's ridiculous acquiescence. You have opened a Pandora's box which likely will have worldwide ramifications.
Extreme vetting on display and I'm all for it. Nothing wrong with detaining these people and making sure they are who and what they say they are
