Trump had active security clearance when Jack Smith indicted him.

Interesting article
Trump had active security clearance when Jack Smith indicted him. President Trump says he has evidence that the Biden administration colluded with various federal agencies to arm Jack Smith with the ammunition for his indictment. Furthermore, he has disclosed an additional bombshell that could once again shake the foundation of the case.
A few weeks after the indictment was handed down, someone at Biden’s DOE noticed Trump still had security clearance for that agency and sent a memo saying his clearance should be removed.
https://revolver.news/2023/11/bombs...en-jack-smith-indicted-him-in-documents-case/
https://www.declassified.live/p/the-forrest-gump-of-january-6-cases
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F-Ca9kmWkAAEIPj?format=png&name=small

 

Now that's funny!

 

And there is, by most accounts, still a SCIF at mar a lago.

 

So?

 

There is NOT!

 

Lols!
This one

Or this one

 

At least this is consistent with the usual level of “proof”. Someone said something to someone else which may or may not be true!
Meanwhile

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...e-can-ex-president-trump-be-trusted-n1248994#

He never had “security clearance” in the first place and

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbr...ss-to-intelligence-briefings/?sh=25e41f3b579c

 

Lying Jack Smith is as corrupt as Dirty Merrick and Bribed Joe.

And here's another amazing 'coincidence' noted in 'The Forrest Gump of January 6 Cases'

In the Trump related cases that will be appealed to the DC appellate court after the District Court Judge Clowns get done with their dog and pony show? Well, they are supposed to be heard by panels randomly drawn from 15 judges, but one particular judge that hates Trump, seems to win every spin of the wheel.



Spin The Wheel, Get the Same Result

'U.S. Circuit Court Judge Cornelia Pillard is one of 15 jurists on the appellate court, but she continues to appear on three-judge panels tasked with deciding the most politically charged cases. Pillard, appointed by Barack Obama in 2013, will hear the Bannon and the gag order appeal this month. She recently cast the deciding vote in favor of DOJ’s application of 1512(c)(2) in J6 cases in a 2-1 split opinion. Pillard also backed the district court orders that compelled Twitter and Trump’s lawyer to produce records to the government.'

'Last month, Pillard joined two colleagues in refusing to put on hold the D.C. Bar Association’s trial of Jeffrey Clark, a former Trump DOJ associate, as he appeals the matter. And in December, Pillard is scheduled to hear “Cowboys for Trump” founder Couy Griffin’s appeal of his trespassing conviction for his conduct on January 6.'

'So, what gives? Federal rules require the “random” selection of judges to sit on a three-person panel to initially review cases at the appellate level—how does Pillard keep popping up on so many weighty J6 cases? A coincidence or just another example of Democrats rigging the system against Donald Trump and his allies?'

 

Digging deeper into the 'mystery' of how this particular Trump hating Judge, one of 15, keeps getting drawn on the 3 judge panels to hear Trump related cases.



'Federal rules require the “random” selection of judges to sit on a three-person panel to initially review cases at the appellate level—how does Pillard keep popping up on so many weighty J6 cases? A coincidence or just another example of Democrats rigging the system against Donald Trump and his allies?'

https://www.declassified.live/p/the-forrest-gump-of-january-6-cases

Anyone want to take any bets on whether she 'just so happens' to be 'randomly drawn' to hear the appeal of Lying Jack's dog and pony show conviction of Trump by the DC district court?

 

Digging deeper into this Trump hating judge, one of 15, who keeps getting drawn to sit on the 3 judge panels that hear the appeals of Trump related cases on the DC Circuit

The Senate refused to confirm her, and finally Dirty Harry Reid invoked the nuclear option and she was confirmed on a simple majority vote.

Pillard has proven to be the biased partisan hack that caused so much opposition to her confirmation. 'She blocked both a court order seeking Hillary Clinton’s deposition in a lawsuit over her use of a private email server and the release of grand jury material from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.'

Goss Graves takes credit for getting her on the bench, they are very tight, and Goss Grave's husband, Matthew Graves, is 'the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia appointed by' Bribed Joe in 2021.

'Graves is responsible for prosecuting every January 6 defendant; one of his first acts as U.S. attorney was charging Bannon with contempt of Congress for defying a subpoena issued by the January 6 Select Committee.'

'Bannon was convicted by a D.C. jury last October. In a statement following the verdict, Graves said that “the subpoena to Stephen Bannon was not an invitation that could be rejected or ignored. Mr. Bannon had an obligation to appear before the House Select Committee to give testimony and provide documents. His refusal to do so was deliberate and now a jury has found that he must pay the consequences.”'

'And after Thursday’s hearing on Bannon’s appeal, Judge Pillard, an associate of Fatima Goss Graves, will decide whether to reverse his conviction—a verdict Matthew Graves has asked Pillard to affirm.'

And, yet another amazing 'coincidence' there's Judge Pillard, randomly drawn, from a pool of 15 to sit on this 3 judge panel!

“It sure seems like a coincidence that all these J6 defendants keep drawing Judge Pillard, a hardcore Obama leftist who’s harsh on Trump supporters and lenient on Democrats,”

Amazing!

https://www.declassified.live/p/the-forrest-gump-of-january-6-cases

It looks like Lying Jack and Dirty Merrick have more than a few aces up their sleeves, to convict Trump and affirm the conviction through the first appeal. And since this all intended to rig the election, as long as they can postpone the complete exoneration until after the election, they will have accomplished their evil purposes.

 

There ya go.
Believe it because it is on the web.
Facts are such inconvenient things sometimes, eh?

 

Prove there is NOT... we can prove there WAS....

Trump had his in a double locked room guarded by the Secret Service.... no one has commented that Mar-a-lago had a SCIF and if that is where the documents were.
White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer
ff to :45
Feb 14, 2017

 

IF there was a SCIF at Mar a Lardass, considering President Biden revoked tRaitor tRump's daily briefings, there is nothing to support the supposition that it is still active. But, plenty to support that it is not; for instance he recently requested that one be reestablished at Mar a Lardass:

DOJ fights Trump effort to reestablish secure facility at Mar-a-Lago

The Justice Department (DOJ) is fighting an effort from former President Trump’s legal team to reestablish a secure facility in Mar-a-Lago, arguing he would be “the only defendant ever” in a classified document case to review evidence in their home.

“Creating a secure location in Trump’s residence — which is also a social club — so he can discuss classified information would be an unnecessary and unjustified accommodation that deviates from the normal course of cases involving classified discovery,” the DOJ wrote in a brief Monday evening.
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4152470-doj-fights-trump-effort-scif-mar-a-lago/

And then there's this:





Those don't look like any SCIF I've ever been in.

 

Sorry are you claiming those photos are faked????? Even Trump does not claim that

 

they think having security clearance means Trump had the right to steal the docs

 

President Trump says he has evidence that the Biden administration colluded with various federal agencies to arm Jack Smith with the ammunition for his indictment.

So where is this evidence? What is Trump waiting on? Is there a particular he hasn't provide such evidence?

 

Great.... show us which box had the "marked" classified document in it.
Your room full of boxes are impressive but not very provable which one document should have been in a SCIF...

https://www.federalregister.gov/doc...to-the-fbis-crossfire-hurricane-investigation

 

Thing is president’s apparently do not get “security clearance” it comes with the job and goes with the job

 

I am happy to wait for that evidence to come out in the court trial. Given that Trump has received far far far more favourable treatment than anyone else charged with similar offences and that if there were a loophole that big then “Loose” Cannon would have declared a mistrial/ thrown the case out I believe the evidence is there

 

Wow! Just because a President leaves office doesn't mean he stopped working behind the scenes. And a Q clearance to boot. It makes it seem like everything since 2016 has been a psyop. What is real? What is not? How do we know?

 

What about these?


I don't think that's the floor of a SCIF.

Funny tRaitor tRump wanted Cross Fire Hurricane docs declassified. That's the company Robert Mercer (owner of Brightbart and employer of Steve Bannon) hooked up the tRaitor tRump campaign with to help get him elected.

 

President Biden pulled his daily briefing. He doesn't have a clearance anymore.

We'll find out if Cannon ever lets the trial happen.

 

Goodness no.
The government wouldn't fake a document to skewer a former president.

Would they?

No, the point of bringing up the SCIF at Mar a Lago was to remind people that as president trump daily dealt with top secret stuff. Even at Mar a Lago. So secret documents at Mar a Lago isn't such a revelation, eh?
And after he was president he still gets daily intelligence briefings.

The photos? Well, which (if any) of those boxes had TOP SECRET documents in them, and since none of us has ever seen a SCIF we can't be sure if that was the SCIF or what the full story is.

Just because its on the web doesn't make it true, does it?

 

Does Biden have Q level security clearance? Trump could be a security agent of the state above Biden's authority.

If this thing goes to trial, things could get strange and bizarre pretty quickly. And it will be broadcast in front of the American people as the media is following Trump's every legal step closely. Beyond closely!

 

Probably not, there's too much potential fallout if it's discovered.

President Biden had his "dailies" stopped.

I've seen one, I've worked in one, the rooms of documents at Mar a Lardass were not SCIF's.

Or ... make it false.