Trump is saying that the press is implying that he could shoot somebody in the street and still be supported by his voters. I think he's saying the press is wrong to imply that.
They pretend not to get. Every time they do that they lose credibility and Trump support expands. Affected MSM/Left outrage has become a joke to a now very angry very cynical voting public.
Yep. And, as with everything now, if the press reported it they would want a lot of independent verification.
Are you that obtuse that you think he was talking about shooting a criminal !!! Come on - as my signature says -"I WAS BORN AT NIGHT, BUT IT WAS NOT LAST NIGHT".
No, I respectfully disagree. The Trumpeteers are not insulted. He knows and they know that he could ask or tell them to perform acts of bestiality at his rallies and they would say "yes sir Mr. Trump bring us the sheep and dogs" . Trump supporters are not stupid people ( well some are ) but they virtually all are gullible.
Like when liberals dismissed democrat Bill Cosby Clinton sexual harassment or democrat Hillary destroying questionable National Security classified email documents and Benghazi blood on her hands or democrat Harry Truman bombing children as target practice for the Cold War to scare the Russians or democrat Bernie Madoff Sanders stealing from the rich and justifying it as socialism and saying women fantasize about rape or democrat Obama's pastor saying ******* America and inspiring Obama to hate America's values? Dismissed!
Bill Cosby Clinton could do nothing wrong but his democrat whores still loved him perverted as he was, so what's your point?
Hillary didn't talk about killing someone, she did. Four Americans lost their lives because of Hillary and Obama.
Let me just point out the stupidity of the OP and the lefties like you running with it. Rhetorical statements like Trump's are said all the time, especially among politicians, and that goes for both sides. With that said, you lefties sensationalizing it, thinking you're somehow scoring points is foolish because similar rhetoric can be easily found coming from your side of the aisle. And we all know you'd come up with some pathetic attempt to defend it.
Ah, that was Hillary and Obama. There was no way they were going to admit to a muslim terrorist attack right before an election, so in spite of 4 Americans dying in the terrorist attack, and sending in protection which would have blown their narrative, they blamed it on a video for political gain! Truth hurts!
They did admit to it, well before the election. But that has nothing to do with them killing 4 people. That's kind of a sick statement and obviously not factual. Truth hurts!
Reminds me of Obama's worshipers. He didn't do a damn thing for his black constituents but they would vote for him again if they could.
I think that it is more likely that Obama's worshippers would commit acts of bestiality if Obama asked them to. You are an anti-working class, anti-white Christian bigot, because most of Trump's base is the white, Christian, working class--(you know the one's who are forced to subsidize the reproduction of the low information crowd on the left?) and you seem to truly hate them. - - - Updated - - - Roosevelt did participate in killing of millions of people, and his socialist crowd on the left still loved him dearly.
Yep, "traitors", "America-hating bastards", slime-bag Constitution-breakers... they're all the same variety of scum. But shooting is too good for them... they need to be shipped off to North Korea to work for an autocratic regime more in line with their anti-American preferences.
Or change the name to Barack and you are describing Obama. But Obama is a student of Alinskyism and Comrade Saul raught keep repeating a lie over and over and eventually the people will believe it. It worked for Obama.
No, you wouldn't be even close. But that sort of comment does make the usual substitution when you can't say anything of substance.
Trump would gain voters if he shot someone. People are sick of the mom Jean wearing, petty little coward we have as president now.