Trump mocks Russian hacking 'conspiracy theory'

Sorry, but I've seen Republicans get away with plenty, and not just the never Trumpers. Trump himself is as corrupt as they come, or will be now that he has a political outlet for his fraudulent personality.

 

Obama would prove it were it true.

But so far, he has not proven it.

We did learn much about Hillary though that she hates it was disclosed.

Did the MSM go after her though? LOL

They went after Trump. That is how it works.

- - - Updated - - -

Sounds as if you truly mourn that Hillary lost. Clearly you don't like G. W. Bush who incidentally did free over 50 million humans.

Obama may be trying yet still fumbling.

 

Thank You,
and
herein lies why it's hard to take anyone serious who harks back to Bush lied to us so he could go into Iraq. They are either too young to have been intellectually present in 2002, or should be living on moonbat island with Elizabreth Warren and Al Gore building windmills.
There is no doubt whatsoever that Saddam "had" WMD's. The intelligent community as a whole was telling Bush that he still had them, Saddam was saying he did not, so reasonable deduction was that if he was hiding something, he had to be confronted. This could of either been done via UN inspectors, or by force. And in fact it was Saddam's choice between the two, entirely. Bush played patty cake with him for months, inspectors in, inspectors OUT, inspectors in, inspectors OUT. It would have been a derelict of duty for Bush not to go in to verify himself.
And after it was verified he did not, and this is where I have issue with Bush, We should have then just pulled out. Like serving a search warrant in someones house, you don't find what you obtained the search warrant for you then leave, the homeowner can take it up with the issuer of the search warrant if he chooses to for any retribution. But make no mistake we were obligated to verify Saddam had no WMD's, in the wake of what had happened on 9/11.
To Bush's credit he felt we owed it to the people of Iraq to clean up the hornets nest we disturbed. I disagree of course but his motive was well intentioned witnessed by capturing a dictator who had brutalized his people and turning him over to stand trial as the people saw fit.

 

Just for the sake of argument, let's assume the Russians did hack.

Did that somehow cause Hillary to install an illegal server in her house?
Did they make her send classified material?
Did the hacking cause her to delete 30,000 emails?
Did they force her to use her charity as a money laundering operation?

When you were in the voting booth, did Boris and Natasha hold a gun to your head and force you to vote Trump?

The left is desperate. When you think about it, the whole charade is laughable.

 

Yes, right... the Brits gave us the faulty intel, and the CIA warned that it could not be corroborated. I had it backwards. My mistake, it has been a while.

This does not change the fact that you claimed that Intel did not agree he had WMDs. The entire worlds intel believed he did... it would appear that this was because Saddam's people were telling him they had capabilities they did not, out of fear.

 

If Hillaria had won and the CIA and a dozen other intelligence agencies had said that the Russakiy had hacked into sites related to thecelections and had at least att emped to influence our elkections in favor of Hillaria you bet that LICE Trump woukd be screaming like a screwed goose in French pate factory demanding that Obamska be impeached fir allowing thevRussakis in. The Trumpocitybwould be demanding redo, retakes, recount, reruns, revive, revolt.

 

Really?

Care to cite some examples.

Oh, there is absolutely zero evidence to suggest Trump is corrupt at all..... If he was corrupt or was shady in any way he would have been exposed long ago....

Look, I'm not defending the GOP, but like I said - they're under a magnifying glass at all times and if they eve STEP in the wrong direction they're screwed.

It's just the way it is......

Democrats get away with being human trash and republicans are held to God-like standards.

 

Well that's what bothers me the most.....

The progressive MSM trash isn't even focusing on the information exposed and what we leared from it - NO they're attacking the messenger.......

Funny how that works.

The information gets swept under the rug...

Oh and that (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) Hillary belongs in prison - and this investigation better continue.... Trump owes his supporters that.

 

First you acknowledge that the CIA warned it couldn't be corroborated, then you say that all the intel agreed. Which is it?

Apparently much of the CIA was dubious, as you just admitted, so it is false to claim that "the entire worlds intel believed he did."

 

The forum can allow Politifact see if that is what Trump said.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...nald-trump-did-call-climate-change-chinese-h/

 

Sounds like you aren't familiar with what I had to say before the election. I voted against her.

Who said I didn't like Bush? We was okay. No worse than Obama. You seem to think that the only two responses someone can have to a candidate are hatred or blind loyalty without any tolerance for honest criticism. I don't follow that philosophy.

 

And those who already follow him unquestioningly will, of course, rewrite his words to make them more palatable. The facts still remain.

 

After my talk with the Alameda County voters registrar office around September 2016, it is very difficult for me to see what stopped illegals from voting. What did they have to lose? They never would face prosecution. Not after what Obama told them to do.

[video=youtube;f8ZKreGbc6c]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8ZKreGbc6c[/video]

 

He has been exposed. Numerous times. Start with his corrupt "University" scam. He's a con artist. Always has been.

 

Too bad I can't cite an instance of those rules applying to Obama nor Hillary Clinton on the part of their loyal supporters.

I have long stated and very openly my view. I wanted Scott Walker and he quit. Then I flipped to Kasich. He lost.

I have Trump. What would be worse is if we had to face it being Hillary Clinton.Bad enough it has been Obama.

 

The rights denial of the findings is clearly reactionary and defensive. McConnell is not agreeing to investigate because it's some obama conspiracy and they know it. No it doesn't mean Trump had a hand in it, but it's still a big problem.

 

If you're fine with foreign governments meddling in our elections then just say so. All your other distractions have nothing to do with the topic.

- - - Updated - - -

Who's alleging collusion? If this is all made up then someone needs to tell Mitch.

 

Then hold him to a high standard now that you have him. Deflecting to Clinton or Obama in order to shelve any and all criticism of the man helps no one.

 

For all the thunder and lightning over Trump U, let these facts stand.

There were in the area of 6000 claims that got settled.

So were each to get the money, what would 6,000 collect each.

A bit over $4,100 each.

With the huge numbers tossed about, does this surprise you at all? That so few sued and the amounts paid are small?

What do the lawyers collect?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...b6397e625d0_story.html?utm_term=.1422283080f5

One student claims he spent just about his last dollar and paid $35,000 for the elite class.

Does this sound sane at all? The man is stupid. Nobody gets an education like that and does so virtually broke as he claims he was.

 

That is right but I do it to show how hypocrites hold Trump to a lot higher standard than they held either Clinton or Obama.

 

While holding him to a much lower standard than you hold either of them? You see the problem with that, right?

 

Did Hillary do wrong? Is that why the dust up over the DNC being ratted out to Wikileaks?

Many us see this about the way the public sees the Mafia getting ratted out.

- - - Updated - - -

Well, you are accusing. But you are not correct.

 

For a class action lawsuit? No, that really doesn't surprise me.

No it doesn't sound sane . . . it also sounds like the exact thing the sales material for Trump U pushed.

Try reading through that sales material some time and try telling me again that there was nothing corrupt going on.

- - - Updated - - -

You expect me to believe that you defended Obama and Clinton the same way that you are defending Trump here?

 

You want someone to prove a negative? Is this for real?

 

This is interesting since it means that Obama committed a false flag to make it appear as if it was Russia that gave Assange the information even though Assange said that it came from inside the DNC. More that likely it was Seth Rich since he was upset over what Clinton did to Sanders and he's the one they murdered.

http://katehon.com/article/bloody-hillary-5-mysterious-murders-linked-clinton

I know the Democrats are freaking out that Soros' new world order is being undone by Trump ... and they will do everything possible to stop him.

They tried to push the neo cons Romney and Gen. Petraeus for the State Department but it didn't work... and they even bribed protesters and Green for a recount. But that's nothing compared to wanting to start a war with Russia by attacking and trying to destroy its banking system... something they tried to do on December 5. A war would have given Obama an excuse to stop the inauguration.

Biden threatened Russia about a serious retaliation for the supposed 'hacking' and had it not been for Kaspersky and its expertise, they might have been successful and it might have ended in a war.

What is ridiculous about the whole thing is that the very CIA that have been interfering and pushing regime changes throughout the world has the gall to accuse Russia of doing the same thing.

Those Republicans like John McCain are neo cons... and want a war with Russia.