Trump reacts to testimony that Clinton spread Russia allegations: 'Where do I get my reputation back

His reputation is firmly fixed in American history as the first potus to attempt a coup after losing the election.
As for his quisling behavior toward Putin, or his appalling response to the pandemic, or his emboldening racists, seditious extremists and qanon lunatics, all of that pales in comparison to his most historic crime.
He finally achieved an actual "first" as potus.
Hopefully the cons learned their lesson and he will be the last one allowed to stain the office of the presidency and demean our country so blatantly.

 

They voted for the "option" of an illegal invasion and are exculpated because they didn't vote for it twice? That's some real "fake".

 

Let’s go Brandon!

 

You heard it here, first! Trump was going to coup himself!!!!

 

But he didn’t try to get FBI to create something out of nothing.

Only in in the heads of the true haters.

 

Haha, what happened to your recent thread about hatred destroying America? Couldn't help yourself even for day, could you?

As to the OP, just like you, Trump has to clean his own house before he is accusing others of the exact things he is doing to falsely attack his opponents.

 

When one Russian agent tells the campaign they plan to help them
And the campaign manager is giving internal campaign data to another Russian agent
While Russia is actively helping their campaign, you have to investigate.

 

Hillary Clinton is one of the most evil people to walk this earth. What do you expect?

 

Literally none of this happened(the so-called data, which people have clutched onto for dear pearl lives, had no impact on the election or any electoral value.). No, you don't *have* to investigate anything that would divert what we know to be limited resources of law enforcement to something we know now to be not true.

Despite pearl clutching, even the Biden DOJ didn't act. Think about that, charging Trump would 'rally' the base, it'd be a great win for Biden, you'd hail him as a savior!(even though the political disruption would be massive) but if they truly believe it to be the right and just thing, then said disruption be damned as the speaker loves to say: No one is above the law.

What did the great myth do, but to create an internal political divide thus accomplishing what James Comey said was Putin's goal? The conspiracy of a conspiracy was the perfect plant for the Kremlin, as they could have both plausible deniability while weakening American institutions.

And the FBI and an entire political spectrum of Americans gobbled up this intelligence warfare with nary a thought. Even one of the said 'russian agents' in an interview laughed off the FBI, telling them the truth that the scheme was far fetched even for the Russians. But the FBI didn't want news to the contrary(like the Miami 'consulate' that didn't exist.)

It never happened, it was a lie created by the Kremlin who knew that English and INTL channels were opening up to such stories(and they increasingly knew post election) and could string us along for pee-pee tapes.

 

Lol Russia didn’t hack the dnc
The Trump tower meeting didn’t happen
Manafort didn’t give internal data to his Russian Intel partner?
Is today even Monday??

 

Considering even the DOJ dropped the hacking case, it pretty much is a verbatim unproven claim that could be true or not true and no one should take it seriously. We live in a results based world, not one where we go chasing everything at the drop of a hat. That's what the reputation of Comey's FBI is, and it's why he was fired.

 

The hacking case wasn’t dropped. Stop making up things.

 

Yes it was, no one was ever to this day charged and convicted with hacking into the DNC. The Trump DOJ tried to do so, but then citing 'national security' purposes, withdrew from the case. So for all intents and purposes, no one has been charged and convicted of a crime.

 

Source?

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/16/us/politics/concord-case-russian-interference.html

We know nothing as of yet of these 'unidentified' charges. The claim of the information being weaponized is of course a claim, and the DOJ did not grant the court the ability to try and salvage the issue pertinent to national security, so we'll never know.

It's a big ambiguous situation, and honestly it's up to a person's personal opinion at this point whether or not it was hacked. It could have been, perhaps it probably was but the DOJ gave up on proving that in the relics of history.

 

Wrong case. Probably the source of your confusion.

 

No man! She is the lead baton twirler!!

 

Isn't it the hacking case in question?

 

Nope. This is

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/gran...ficers-hacking-offenses-related-2016-election