Trump stormed out of a infrastructure meeting

Love it! He's nowhere near as dumb as the liberal flakes could wish him to be? lol

 

The dumbing down of the USA and the UK has been going on for about 3 decades, and now I'm beginning to see what it's all about . . . control of the masses. Thankfully though, some of us have been immune to it, haven't we Fred?

 

Dumbing down is also occurring in Australia...

 

Thanks Fred, but there's just too much in the link to get my head around - especially at 0630 - and even more especially because it looks a cast of thousands were involved.

 

Well you're 'the western world' too . . . it's just that you're in the wrong place?

 

Good for him. Pelosi knew what she was doing. She is the one that detailed the meeting because she knew what the outcome would be.

And the Dems are liars regarding the "signs" held up in the rise garden when Trump came out to speak. They hastily done between the time she made the "statement" and arrived at the Oval office. Not printed ahead of time as she and Schumer suggested. It was them that planned ahead of time.

And Schumer said he had a 30 Page report for the President on Infrastructures. They need to attack that problem by fixing the most critical issue first as Border Control has asked for. It is the Democrats that created the border crisis. The ignored the President and those closest to the problem.

 

He displays his incompetence every day without help,

A Single Scandal Sums Up All of Trump’s Failures
The president has been intervening in the process of producing a border wall, on behalf of a favored firm.

MAY 24, 2019



David A. Graham
Staff writer at The Atlantic

 

Not according to Harvard. According to Harvard, Fox is fair and balanced


Is Harvard far right too?

 

My point is that you cant accuse your executive of a crime right before the meeting and expect to have it be productive

Maybe you'll be interested in having a meeting with those who are actively seeking to destroy you. You can grant them victory as you die from 1000 cuts.

 

You got evidence that Trump coming criminal collusion that Bob Mueller didn't see.

All Democrats do is accuse, accuse, accuse. Without any evidence

 

His son is a liar, yes? You can't have it all ways.
Do I got evidence? I got suspicions that need to be investigated.

 

Really? That is all you got? Good luck winning an election on that.

 

Pelosi is not motivated to work for any bipartisan infrastructure improvement.
If it is successful, it might rate as a Trump or GOP accomplishment
and that is foremost in her sick, sick, mind.
Not the benefit to

Today's Democratic Party is about continuing the campaign after the election.
I don't remember that type of behavior before.
There use to be a Honeymoon period of a new President.
Trump has been exposed to such vitriol had it been Obama, race would be invoked.


Moi
From a Democratic Party Family.
Voted Obama '08

​

 

Trump does lot of negative things, even more republicans will admit that, hard not to report the negatives, if they did not... they would be really bias

now fox like to spin much of the negative as a positive... but they still talk about the negatives

 

Sit there and criticize all you want, but if you guys lose the election, I'm not going to listen to your whining that the House did nothing. They've passed over 50 bills so far this year.

 

You're right. It's a complicated issue with lengthy cast of international characters. There'll still be some juicy bits that may interest you enough to give a good idea of what's been going on.

 

Did they have a tough time getting it past those who were for more child abuse and less treatment for its victims?

 

I was not present for the debate, so I cannot definitively say one way or another.

 

I got suspicions that you rape little children. I have no evidence though. But that's enough to investigate every facet of your life. Right?

 

Negative things like what?

Like trying to enact policies that the American people voted for?

Fake news cannot distinguish their personal bias and hatred for trump with fact.

Fact is that Trump is doing exactly what he promised. What people voted for him to do. Media may not like those policies, but like the past president once famously said. Elections have consequences.

 

like attacking war heroes like John McCain, his refusal to lower the flag after he passed, lot of stupid nonsense

the Russia ordeal, the killed reporter... the list goes on

 

Thats a matter of opinion. I dont find that negative. I find that well deserved. Mcaine attacked Trump first. Being a "war hero" doesn't give you a free pass to attack someone.

Fake news report opinions instead of fact

More opinions from the left. But it isn't news.

 

no he did not, Trump attacked McCain first.. but regardless a decent President would not of attacked him on his death bed, that is just petty

what did Trump do about the murdered reporter other then defend the killer?

 

Wrong. There is a pattern in this case and Trump's conduct which begs for an investigation.

 

There's plenty of favouritism, nepotism and corruption going on in the US... if you showed me someone not engaging in corruption in some form or the other I would be surprised