Discussion in 'United States' started by DennisTate, Mar 11, 2019.
Pinch of salt Dennis, pinch of salt.
Ps. I thought Old Man Bush was not a bad bloke too, for a President.
The thing is........ you need to do more homework to get any idea of how huge this whole thing really is...... and how many TRILLIONS of dollars worth of obsolete and essentially worthless infrastructure are involved!
True.... but the statement is made that The Taliban had just about wiped out the heroin and opium trade out of Afghanistan until...............
He certainly played the role in something of an Academy Award winning manner ......
and if... the accusation is true that as a young CIA agent he had been involved in a certain event in 1963 then.........
how could he turn on the people who were promoting him to higher and higher and higher and higher positions of power and authority???????
Lets see, the question is whether it is best to follow trumps suggestion that democrats and republicans mutually cover up eachothers misdeeds?
I have to say i am a bit amazed that a person of trumps integrity (and nothing to hide) would contenance such a suggestion
Anyway, I emphatically say no. Let it all come out.
Lets see all the stuff that has been pushed under the rug
So we are in agreement that any and all reports on any and all people in the parties doing bad thing should be released.
Donald trump has a history of relentlessly attacking anyone he sees as an enemy... even to the extent of inventing scandals like obamas birth Certificate, ted cruzs fathers conspiracy with lee harvey oswald, obamas excessive vacations and golf games.
So dennis, a question for you. Lets say that trump had all this dirt on his democratic enemies. Are you telling me that you would have confidence that he would keep those scandals in the box. And if so... what sort of trumpian scandals would so terrify him so much to make him suppress democratic scandals?
Ardy, release them all.
Exactly..... I do believe that President Trump does want to release them all but...........
He could NOT do it before the 2018 primaries..........
That would have muddied the water far too much........
He also had to have another somewhat "conservative" vote on the Supreme Court.........
I personally believe that involvement in Human Trafficking is an obvious priority.......
Involvement in a plot to derail the Trump Presidency would be a massive priority...........
Virtually irrefutable involvement in the assassination of JFK may already have been dealt with and I suspect that within two more years a lot may well be released on that subject..........
Involvement in an attempt on the life of President Ronald Reagan may already have been dealt with...... (and there is one that is also not the fault mainly of the Dems but very likely of corrupt members of the G.O.P. ).......
(and just in case this image strangely disappears):
There is far far more than that, particularly on Trump and his supporters.
So Trump is withholding evidence of criminal activity yet keeps it under wraps? He is just like the ones he considered bad.
Is this going to be another game of chicken with congress??? Last time, shutting down the government until his border wall was funded, was a game he didn't win, so what makes this time any different???
One possibility would be the release of technology that will boggle the mind of most Americans........ and Canadians.
Probably NOT tech along the line of what is implied in this discussion:
Could this UFO have been Made in America?
Probably more along the line of this type of technology:
Partly because it would tend to back up this possible positive trend:
Could a real estate boom plus better Fed policy pay off USA national debt?
What is about to be done........
has to be done extremely well so that those being charged will not be able to use some loophole to walk free. Those about to be charged can afford astonishingly good lawyers.......
Perhaps your favorite sources for "information" decided to pass on feeding you revelations found in the transcript of Bruce Ohr's testimony released a few days ago.
"Ohr testimony contradicts that of Simpson and Rosenstein and also the narrative pushed by Adam Schiff"
Ninety point nine percent of residents of Washington D. C. voted for Hillary...........
many of those votes were card carrying members of the G. O. P. so you are correct..... a lot of evidence is there against people who may claim to be "Trump supporters" officially.
I suspect that Trump is serious, but in truth the entire media system spent eight straight years blocking, covering, and spinning for Barack Obama and his inner circle minions no matter what they did. Eight years of fanatically and frantically calling Up down and In out. So if Trump were to reveal anything truly noxious from that era or noxious regarding Pelosi and company the MSM would STILL fanatically and frantically spin and cover for them.
Look at the fact that one of our newest young Representatives is an open anti-semite and they won't call her out because she is female and has got a brown skin tone and is Islamic and most of all because she is a . . . leftist. So Trump probably does mean it; but I have my doubts that it would be effective.
Oh golly! That’s scary!
Contradictions are not automatically true or effective or conclusive.
It would be much more surprising if assassination attempts haven't been made. There are a large number of people openly calling themselves "The Resistance", as if Trump is Darth Vader. You've got Kathy Griffen cutting his head off, Madonna blowing up the White House, and Shakespeare in the Park stabbing him to death. We had the dude who shot up the GOP baseball game; how much more would he have liked to shoot Trump than random congressmen? 24/7 negative coverage in most of the media. Put it in this context: Ronald Reagan was highly popular, got NONE of this kind of crazy hate, and he got shot.
Let's rat out every crooked politician. But that likely means very few left. And the bribe game of campaign donations called out also?
Nope, not that, bribery is legal in our system.
ok, now this has to move to the conspiracy section
Separate names with a comma.