Truther Heaven

Dodging back to semantics? Typical.

 

It was. Are you now going to pretend the debris came from some other source than the towers? Or are you going to go with nothing follows and pretend you don't have to defend your abso(*)(*)(*)(*)inglutely retarded opinions?

 

Is there a video or photo depicting the claim that most americans dont believe the story 100%?

 

WOW this was too easy!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polls_about_9/11_conspiracy_theories


remember what i said....most americans dont believe the official story 100%...

you failed ...AGAIN... patriot911 is a way better debunker then you..

i heard this messageboard needed a 9/11 debunker..

http://gabbafriends.com/forum#.UChe9KFlTTU

 

there has to be an actual EVENT to capture.. how do you take a photo of a poll?

 

So why can't you just admit you don't have pictures or videos of the people taking the poll?

 

we can get back to that photo...

but back to the link i was bugged into providing... did it infact prove my point? or are you able to "debunk" it?

 

So . . . no photo or video depicting that poll you speak of? Wouldn't respondents answering the questions be an actual event?

I guess not if there is no photo or video evidence. Must just be more made up writing.

 

Debunk what? Your claim was "does it bother you that most americans dont believe the story 100%?" I would be worried about people who believe the story 100%. I don't. I thought you were just doing your usual truther crap by posting obvious statements that mean nothing. Now, if you had said most Americans believe the government was behind 9/11, I would say your claim is (*)(*)(*)(*).

 

wanna tell your boy i was right then? and my statement was 100% correct?

 

Given the source, and your lack of evidence; nope, not bothered one bit.

 

"My boy"? How insulting. Didn't you get the memo you're not suppose to insult people?

 

"your boy" means your friend.. like...."whats up dog?" doesnt mean someone is literally asking a dog what is above him.

 

Wrong yet again. Care to see what the mods think? I am betting they're not going to see you meaning it that way.

 

You're being a tad sensitive, Patriot. Man up, remember?

 

And post #386 needs a response, please.

 

So does #389

 

So once again, we're back to this: you believe what you have read and been shown.

 

I believe what I have researched for myself from multiple sources.

 

Like what?

 

i like how you portray yourself as some independent researcher who looks at all information and does not pick sides...lol

something tells me....AS the official story changes..you will jockey to protect that also..

 

Notice how he's changed his story too. It's always been what he's been told by the government and what he's read that's been released by the government that has been his accepted narrative of what happened in or on 9/11. NOW it's because he's researched it himself. As if he has actually questioned something.

 

what i dont get is...

why would anyone "research" 9/11? my mother didnt... my grandfather didnt.. my boss didnt...they believe "most" of the official story.. so why a "believer" would research anything is beyond me.

 

I started after watching the Tenth Anniversary Special thing they had on television.

 

Mostly, it was the usual suspects, malcontents and white nationalists who want to stir up some crap who siezed on yet another event to shriek about "false flags" to turn people against the government.