This thread is for truthers to explain what they think the Bentham paper means, and it's conclusions using their own words, with no links to or quotes of other truther's interpretations. The previous Bentham thread revealed that most truthers don't actually understand the paper. Certainly not enough to judge whether its credible or not. I think it will be a good exercise. If you really understand something, you'll be able to put it in your own words and answer questions and refutations accordingly. Note: in refuting interpretations you disagree with in replies after stating your case, quoting the paper itself is acceptable. For reference: Link to Bentham Paper. Or right click and "save as".
So the people that you call Truthers are supposed to jump through hoops because you say so? Even though something simple like the Conservation of Momentum of the supposed collapse cannot be analyzed without distribution of mass data. LOL psik
