Tucker Carlson starts to divulge the Capitol video tapes

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by popscott, Mar 6, 2023.

  1. JCS

    JCS Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2019
    Messages:
    1,933
    Likes Received:
    819
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You said "Sudden cardiac death in young males has become increasingly common." So I had assumed you meant the more recent (post-covid vaccine era) rise in cardiac deaths in youth, which is actually occurring now. These are due to a combination of covid vaccines and the roll out of 5G, but more so I believe from the vaccinations due to their ingredients & exceptionally poisonous nature. All vaccines are toxic, but the covid vaxxes have taken the dangers of these jabs to the next level.

    But since you brought up the sudden increase in heart disease in 2011, you should know that it was around Dec 2010 when 4G was rolled out. History has shown that when new technologies that produce high levels of EMF are introduced, there is an epidemic of illness. This was observed as far back as the days of the telegraph. Past studies & observations have shown that artificial EMF damages the heart, the neurological system, lungs/respiratory system, bones, eyes, the endocrine system, and so on, and also induces metabolic disorders. Flu symptoms with concomitant respiratory disorders (ie, hypoxia) are typical occurrences.
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2023
  2. JCS

    JCS Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2019
    Messages:
    1,933
    Likes Received:
    819
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Chansley: "I actually stopped somebody from stealing muffins out of the break room." :roflol:

    And gotta love the bleeding heart music they added to that bit.

    I do disagree with his sentence though. The knucklehead didn't really do anything but walk into the building after the mob broke in and should've been given probation for unlawful entry into a govt building.
     
  3. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,766
    Likes Received:
    25,704
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IOW you agree, blaming Officer Sicknick's death on J6 is just more obvious, and therefore ineffective, irrational partisan political propaganda.
    When will they ever learn? :)

    “Background: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the most common cause of death in adults aged <65 years, making it a major public health problem.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, Increase in sudden death from coronary artery disease in young adults, Dabit Arzamendi 1, Begoña Benito, Helena Tizon-Marcos, Jose Flores, Jean François Tanguay, Hung Ly, Serge Doucet, Louis Leduc, Tack Ki Leung, Oscar Campuzano, Anna Iglesias, Mario Talajic, Ramon Brugada, . 2011 Mar;16.
    Affiliations expand PMID: 21392614 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.040
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21392614/
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  4. JCS

    JCS Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2019
    Messages:
    1,933
    Likes Received:
    819
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What's the problem? No one was indicted for Sicknick's death. But if his death was ultimately due to the covid jab, then the riot only expedited his death, since the clot would already have been present. The coroner should've performed a D-dimer test to test for a potential vaccine adverse effect. I doubt if he did.

    The 'most common cause' does NOT necessarily mean frequent. It's like saying the most common cause of death among pilots on the job is impact with the ground. Yes, it's the most common cause, but it's not frequent.
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2023
  5. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    19,321
    Likes Received:
    12,929
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The videos the Democrat's so desperately tried to hide for 2 years show him correct...
     
    ButterBalls and Ddyad like this.
  6. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,766
    Likes Received:
    25,704
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I see. ;-)
     
  7. JCS

    JCS Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2019
    Messages:
    1,933
    Likes Received:
    819
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The shaman guy is not an important part of the J6 event. He's a sideshow freak.

    The break in, the violence, and the threats to lawmakers by the mob were the issue at hand.
     
  8. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    19,321
    Likes Received:
    12,929
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Great let's see it all... not what Democrat want show us... I want to the Michael Byrd's side of the doors on Capitol video when Byrd sprung out from his hidden ambush position to murder Ashli Babbitt... there are many people that need to go to jail...no doubt... but there are many that are being used as show pawns...
     
  9. JCS

    JCS Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2019
    Messages:
    1,933
    Likes Received:
    819
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Everyone could see (through the glass window) Byrd's arm sticking way out holding a gun pointed at the hole the mob made in the doorway. Babbitt was even warned repeatedly about it. That's not an ambush - that's stupidity on Babbitt's part.
     
  10. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    19,321
    Likes Received:
    12,929
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Prove Ashli was warned "repeatedly about it"..
     
  11. JCS

    JCS Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2019
    Messages:
    1,933
    Likes Received:
    819
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Watch the video. She's warned - "He's got a gun!"
     
  12. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    19,321
    Likes Received:
    12,929
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Show us the video please... ""She's warned - "He's got a gun!"" your distorting what happened and not telling the truth.. Someone shouting gun and having a man on the other side of a door is a stretch you can't make.
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2023
  13. JCS

    JCS Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2019
    Messages:
    1,933
    Likes Received:
    819
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  14. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    19,321
    Likes Received:
    12,929
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No one pointed out to Ashli there was a man on the other side of the door with a gun... Your try at misleading and misinterpreting what went on shows your desperation to make it what it was not... at no time does she go to the left side where Byrd was on the left side... there was a door and pile of furniture between them. Please stop posting misinformation.
     
  15. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What makes you say that they would "probably" do that?

    You say the the GOP is "MAGA-contaminated", and I say that the dems are WOKE-contaminated. (As is the equity agenda, critical race theory, radical gender ideology, support for mutilating kids. The list goes on.)

    So what right wing hate are Republican politicians engaged in exactly?

    I don't recall your cult descriptions saying anything about breaking into the Capitol.

    Sounds like you agree that he was indeed a cult figure.

    Seriously? Take a look at the below video! Oh man, thank you so much for getting me to relive this! :roflol:

    Oh interesting. On what charges? "Soon." Whatever the hell that means. Such a stupid word that one.

    What about her?

    Oh, so that's literally the only thing that he did?

    Well that would have been a separate argument about whether or not they should remain post-evac. But surely you acknowledge that it would have assisted the evac process.

    No, the air support was removed during the evac process. That's directly connected to the instantaneous collapse of the useless Afghan military which was only realistically functional with it in place.

    Yeah, so when the Dems controlled the House. Now it's the Republicans' turn. Get used to it. Plus, those hearings took place about 5 minutes after the evacuation concluded. More details may have come to light in the 18 months since.

    So then you should be against the Russia probe.

    Only investigations by Congress use taxpayer money?

    Yes, because it uncovered a giant conspiracy between Trump and Russia to interfere in the 2016 election! :roflol:

    What does this have to do with him being President? Would he not have made that money regardless?
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2023
  16. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Including outside?

    Which video? Not Carlson's surely. If you mean Carlson's, then you're not aware that the 'fire extinguisher' idea was debunked like a week after it was reported.

    Actually, the coroner concluded that it had nothing to do with a fire extinguisher.

    Relevance?

    Neither was being faced with cinder blocks and Molotov cocktails being tossed at them all summer long. But was it collectively worse that Jan 6? Obviously. But I'm certainly not one to downplay the unbelievable violence faced by the brave officers responding to the events of Jan 6.

    I was just checking that there wasn't also a 'tear gas' element to the Sicknick story. I heard that it was bear spray that he was hit with. Whether that could have contributed to his stroke, I have no idea.

    Which is exactly why it was ridiculous to label me as a leftist.

    I included them because they are all liberals who I have had huge extended debates with.

    Well, I sure as hell got a laugh out of it. I mean really... ME! A LEFTIST! It's too much! :roflol:
     
  17. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well that is VERY interesting indeed! What if I told you that I agree with all of the cultural moves of Ron Desantis?
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2023
  18. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well let's see, we have a radical leftist agenda which is completely dictated by the 'equity' BS, critical race theory nonsense, the promotion of radical gender theory and mutilating children, spending policies which have led to inflation and other bad economic outcomes. Yes, those "moderate democrats" have complete control! :roflol:

    Yes, because we all know that the Democrats put the country first! :roflol:
     
  19. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So your point is that it is 'lies PLUS' with Fox. Well, CNN has lies PLUS delusional conspiracy myths too. And instead of "perpetual bleeding heart patriotic drivel" it is 'perpetual racial grievance drivel.'

    How exactly?

    So what do you call democracy then?

    I encourage you to watch the below clip from your favourite personality! Just skip to the clips from Reid and Cross to see the absolute RACIST BILE they are talking. Tell me what you think.


    But you agree that the record has been set straight by the truth coming out about Sicknick.
     
  20. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Sorry for the confusion. You said:
    I read that as: It's certainly possible, but it doesn't seem probable that as an infiltrator he would have been aware of the mob's plans. I'm not quite sure how I read it in that way. I may have had a few drinks in me.
     
  21. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't know WHAT Trump knew. And neither do you.

    I don't know WHAT Trump wanted. And neither do you.

    Not at all. No President is interested in that.

    So apparently you think that Trump is some sort of Constitutional scholar.

    Well your claim is that there is no possible way that they would've believed that it was possible to achieve with NON-force, so then why the hell would they have believed that it was possible to achieve with force?

    All correct.

    Yes, Trump's an idiot. Who knew!

    Do you have an answer to that?

    Did Flynn talk about "force?"

    I have no idea. And neither do you.

    Yes it is actually. I think that Trump, based on his belief that the election was stolen from him and that he actually won, just wanted justice, which for him was seeing out a second term. He would not have had any 'stolen election' narrative at the end of his second term obviously.
     
  22. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There's no reason for me to review evidence which does not prove criminality.

    Okay, SO WHAT?

    Unless it proves criminality, then it's not relevant.

    I think that it doesn't prove criminality, that's what I think.

    Yet ANOTHER thing which does not prove criminality. I'm getting bored now.

    Yeah, let's take something that a former employee of Twitter’s moderation team said seriously! :roflol:

    I have no idea WHAT Trump was aware of. And neither do you.

    The totally LEGAL march to the Capitol. And I just love how you use the term "instigated", which typically refers to something bad/illegal. I suppose you would talk about the 'instigation' of BLM protests! :roflol:

    Specifically the extent of VIOLENT involvement of right-wing extremist groups? If so, then I agree, but it would have nothing to do with Trump.

    Yes, the rally was stupid.

    You're forgetting that Trump can't speak the English language. It seems likely that by saying "STAND back" his brain went to another phrase with the word "STAND" in it, maybe even thinking that it's just another way of saying "stand back."
     
  23. FAW

    FAW Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    13,440
    Likes Received:
    4,021
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did Carlson have videos when the initial reports of the fire extinguisher beating came out? Of course not. Initial reports mean initial reports, as in when it first happened. After those reports they went through and followed his video in order to arrest whomever conducted this reported attack. The report turned out to be false. There was no beating with a fire extinguisher on Sicknick.


    LOL....Oh....is that why one of the people that you summoned, responded to your silly tactic and basically called you a d-bag for expecting him to speak to your conservatism? Yeah, he really thought that was funny (sarcasm)

    He was right.

    Nobody cares. Get over yourself. The only thing actually funny was that guy excoriating you for your silly summoning. My god, its not like I even used leftist as an ad hom or something of that nature to shut you up. I said something along the lines of "you and other leftists believe...". There is truly nothing funny about that if it turns out you are not a leftist and instead just decided to join in and side with the leftist with whom I was speaking.


    BTW,....The way that you chop up other peoples posts into one or two sentences and then reply to the fragments you just created is misleading. Whether that is your intention or not, it blurs context heavily. You might think that is being straight forward. It is not. As a reader, it makes you want to skip right over whatever you have written. The only thing that tactic fosters is aimless bickering, while specifically obliterating any point that you or the other person may be trying to make. Since we apparently mostly argue for Conservatism, you may as well learn how to do it effectively. Out of context aimless bickering does not fit the bill. I see your arguments offered above with several different people and every one of them are the same. Just stop with the slicing and citing of their posts. It is not something people read. It just becomes your private little bickering session with each person. You are wasting bandwidth.
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2023
  24. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's called a 'point-by-point' reply, something you obviously aren't capable of doing.
     
  25. FAW

    FAW Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    13,440
    Likes Received:
    4,021
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't care what you call it. It is an ineffective means of fostering a productive conversation.

    The way that you chop up other peoples posts into one or two sentences and then reply to the fragments you just created is misleading. Whether that is your intention or not, it blurs context heavily. You might think that is being straight forward. It is not. As a reader, it makes you want to skip right over whatever you have written. The only thing that tactic fosters is aimless bickering, while specifically obliterating any point that you or the other person may be trying to make. Since we apparently mostly argue for Conservatism, you may as well learn how to do it effectively. Out of context aimless bickering does not fit the bill. I see your arguments offered above with several different people and every one of them are the same. Just stop with the slicing and dicing of their posts. It is not something people read. It just becomes your private little bickering session with each person. You are wasting bandwidth.

    Perusing the 3 or 4 people you are conversing with above, your responses are nothing but a jumbled mess, and this is of your doing. People from either side do not want to be deciphering that crap. They just skip over it.

    There is a reason that people use paragraphs to help create context. Chopping up those paragraphs into individual sentences as a matter of habit is not an effective means of communicating. There is the occasion when one sentence captures the essence and only it needs to be quoted, but that is not what you do. You chop EVERYTHING up to the point that it is unrecognizable.

    You may not like it and you certainly will not admit it, but my point is rock solid.
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2023

Share This Page