Two Pro-Choice Principles

Discussion in 'Abortion' started by LibertarianFTW, Feb 15, 2012.

  1. RPA1

    RPA1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    22,806
    Likes Received:
    1,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Without potential there is no human being. Can you not see this?

    Bringing up the term 'zygote' in relation to abortion. I already explained that to you.

    There you go interjecting zygote into a discussion about abortion. Yes, a zygote will most likely develop into a fully formed human being but, it cannot be subject to an abortion because it is not physically available for such a procedure.

    That is something every woman has to decide on her own because of the Roe decision. Unfortunately, the feminist dogma that a developing human life is expendable has been propagandized for decades since today's adult women were children. Just because one has the right to kill developing human life does not make it moral or without personal and societal repercussions.

    Is an embryo alive or not? Put another way....Does an embryo have life? Is an human embryo human or not?

    I see a gap in thinking with regard to THOSE folks.

    If an embryo is 'developing into a human' then how is it not a 'developing human life?' That just makes no sense. It will not develop into say....a dog if not aborted.

    Then an abortion is effectively killing a developing human life isn't it?
     
  2. MegadethFan

    MegadethFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    17,385
    Likes Received:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    63
    What's the problem with that?
     

Share This Page