U.S Airstrikes Take Out ISIS 'External Attack' Planners Linked to Paris Attacks

Discussion in 'Terrorism' started by Seth Bullock, Dec 29, 2015.

  1. Seth Bullock

    Seth Bullock Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2015
    Messages:
    13,681
    Likes Received:
    11,972
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The U.S. military is reporting that they have targeted several members of the Islamic State's external operations arm in recent weeks. Excerpts of an article in the Long War Journal.

    “Over the past month we’ve killed 10 ISIL leadership figures with targeted airstrikes, including several external attack planners, some of whom are linked to the Paris attacks,” US Army Colonel Steve Warren, the spokesman for Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR), said ...

    Warren named the “external attack planners” who are believed to be dead. One of them is Charaffe al Mouadan, who was struck down on Dec. 24....

    Al Mouadan was a “Syrian-based leader with a direct link” to Abdelhamid Abaaoud, who has been identified as the “Paris attack cell leader.” ...

    Warren identified another member of the Islamic State’s external operations team as Abdul Qader Hakim, who was killed in an airstrike in Mosul on Dec. 26. Hakim was a facilitator for the “caliphate’s” international terrorist operations and also tied to the cell in Paris.


    Full article: http://www.longwarjournal.org/archi...es-external-attack-planners-in-airstrikes.php

    The full article gives more detail on these two deceased terrorists.

    How do you feel about the U.S./Coalition bombing campaign in Iraq and Syria?
     
  2. dnsmith

    dnsmith New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    5,761
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I believe the air attacks are great. But to do the job we need infantry troops on the ground to back up the Special Forces.
     
  3. Seth Bullock

    Seth Bullock Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2015
    Messages:
    13,681
    Likes Received:
    11,972
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I believe the air strikes are gradually having the desired effect of debilitating ISIS forces on the ground. I am sure the air support was crucial for the Iraqi forces that just retook Ramadi. I also sensed some desperation in the recent audio speech from the ISIS leader, al-Baghdadi, as he was basically begging the U.S. to send ground forces. So far, just about the only people (besides some resident minorities) that ISIS has been able to kill in Iraq and Syria are Muslims, which doesn't exactly make a great recruitment poster. If the U.S. backed Iraqi forces can move on and get another victory, like in Fallujah for example, we could hold out hope that we are seeing the beginning of the end for ISIS in Iraq.

    I understand your point about sending in the infantry, but it sure would be nice if the Iraqis could get it done on their own.
     
  4. APACHERAT

    APACHERAT Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    38,026
    Likes Received:
    16,042
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Funny you would mention that.

    U.S. Special Operation Forces like Army Special Forces, Navy Seals, etc. are dependent on the regular Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force to perform their missions while Army or Marine rifle battalions can operate independently and aren't dependent on Special Operations Forces.
     

Share This Page