U.S. enters 2024 with its smallest military in over 80 years as active-duty troop numbers sink to le

Discussion in 'Warfare / Military' started by Lil Mike, Dec 17, 2023.

  1. AARguy

    AARguy Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2021
    Messages:
    14,265
    Likes Received:
    6,652
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    COURAGE AND DRIVE!!! (Class of) '75!!!
     
  2. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,551
    Likes Received:
    2,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I guess you keep forgetting that not only are a hell of a lot of us veterans, we are retired veterans.

    I just recently retired myself after decades in the military. And I could go back in... for about 10 months. Then I hit 60 which is the mandatory retirement age.

    I myself was planning to remain in until forced out. But the last several years was more than enough for me. We are at close to a decade and a half of troop cuts, forced drawdowns, and sitting with our thumbs up our arses due to lack of funding, lack of direction, and more nonsense being foisted upon us every year. And driving over 6 hours each way just to sit on my butt attending endless lectures for 2 days each month was simply more than I could take.
     
    AARguy likes this.
  3. Moonglow

    Moonglow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Messages:
    20,754
    Likes Received:
    8,047
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    When they started pee test I got the hell out, went into industrial work when they started I became self employed until they stopped. Now we be kewl.
     
  4. AARguy

    AARguy Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2021
    Messages:
    14,265
    Likes Received:
    6,652
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So are a druggie?
     
    Mushroom likes this.
  5. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,551
    Likes Received:
    2,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Obviously, and thinks more about his drugs than anything else. Including safety, obviously.
     
    AARguy likes this.
  6. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,447
    Likes Received:
    6,733
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Really? M-1s cannot load their own cannons
     
    Mushroom likes this.
  7. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You honestly think we don't have the tech to put together a self-loading, remotely driven tank?


    Really?
     
  8. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,551
    Likes Received:
    2,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It, it could be possible to do so, but why? You can only remotely fire one for a single round.

    You seem to be confusing US tanks with those made in the USSR-Russia. The US has never adopted the autoloader, other than as far as I am aware a single self-propelled howitzer that was never adopted. The US simply does not use autoloaders, and requires an actual human to load in the next shell.

    So a remotely operated M1 tank is absolutely worthless. They could fire a single shot, then that would be it.
     
    Dayton3 likes this.
  9. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,551
    Likes Received:
    2,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That is not what you said. You can not do that with an M1 Abrams.

    And no, the US has no interest in doing such, for many reasons.
     
    Dayton3 likes this.
  10. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    51,635
    Likes Received:
    22,946
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Navy is handling the recruiting shortage by the usual methods...

    No Diploma? No problem! Navy Again Lowers Requirements as it Struggles to Meet Recruitment Goals

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Navy is starting to enlist individuals who didn't graduate from high school or get a GED, marking the second time in about a year that the service has opened the door to lower-performing recruits as it struggles to meet enlistment goals.

    The decision follows a move in December 2022 to bring in a larger number of recruits who score very low on the Armed Services Qualification Test. Both are fairly rare steps that the other military services largely avoid or limit, even though they are all finding it increasingly difficult to attract the dwindling number of young people who can meet the military’s physical, mental and moral standards.

    Under the new plan, Navy recruits without an education credential will be able to join as long as they score 50 or above on the qualification test, which is out of 99. The last time the service took individuals without education credentials was in 2000.
     
  11. Dirty Rotten Imbecile

    Dirty Rotten Imbecile Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2016
    Messages:
    2,162
    Likes Received:
    873
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This guy has really good videos. In this one he talks about how the Marines are reforming their units to be more effective.

     
    Dayton3 likes this.

Share This Page