Uber ordered to pay $1.1m to blind passenger who was denied rides 14 times

Yes, if Uber is making that decision about their policy of their own accord, and it was not government who forced them.

We're just arguing around in circles now.

 

Or spread rumors to the blind about Korean drivers who will steal their dogs and eat them.

 

not when you agree to the fair, then you can't discriminate, you made a deal to give them a ride

 

If they are allowed to set the terms before the deal.

For example "Absolutely no dogs allowed, not even service animals", blind person agrees and pays. If the blind person shows up with a dog, the blind person is the one violating the terms of the deal.

 

That's right I have the right to be a dick especially if it's in my car. It's not a crime nobody's going to arrest me I won't face any fines Uber will. That's what they get for relying on other people's assets to do their business.

 

nope, if your religion prevents you from doing a job, don't do the job

if you're a vegan and can't serve meat, don't work someone that serves meat... simple

 

Even if I agree to the fair. In fact if I let you in my car and decide I want you the hell out I can stop my car put it in park get out open the door and forcibly remove you anytime I want. Nobody is ever entitled to my property except for me.

 

In some cases I can agree with that, but in many cases I strongly disagree.

For example, if you are pro-Life, it's probably not a good idea to work in abortion clinic.

If you are Muslim, it's probably not a good idea to work in a Southern BBQ rib place.

 

So what does Uber do Muslims need not apply that's better?

 

if they can't follow the law, best not to apply

 

you do not have the right to not follow Ubers rules or the law

 

You know it's against the law to discriminate against people on the basis of religion.

 

nope, you can't

well you can, but you can be sued and arrested

anyone that forcibly remove a blind person and put their lives in danger should be guilty of a felony

 

no one is doing that, the religious person is discriminating based on their religious beliefs

ones religion does not allow them to break the law, no stoning people cause they pick up sticks on the weekend

 

I absolutely do I own the asset. More than that I'm not an indentured servant I don't know anybody anything.

Uber was pretty stupid to rely on other people's assets to do their business.

 

nope, you agreed to follow Uber policy when you signed up, which includes following the ADA

 

to me, a good religion would not support doing this to the blind

 

the hell I can't it's my car I am the supreme overlord and dictator within it.

anybody who brings a lawsuit like that against me would be left out of court it would be dismissed with no standing. And I would sue the police officer and probably win for wrongful arrest.

Nobody has any right to my vehicle.

 

Well I'm not sure religions are going to start consulting you on what's good or not.

 

Uber doesn't have a policy in my car if they want to they have to purchase it.

 

lol, so you think

 

if you signed up, agreed to the fair, you have to follow the rules

 

if Uber requires them to violate their religion then yes someone is doing that.

If the law interferes with the free exercise thereof then it isn't a law Constitution trumps Ada

 

probably not, I would point out their flaws, and they do not want to see them

same reason they tried to hide pedophile priests from the public

denying the blind a ride is a flaw in one's religion

 

What's going to happen to me if I don't?