We both know that this is cultural/religious. Why do progressives alway hide behind skin color, when their social engineering schemes go horribly wrong? "However, there is a consensus among prosecutors, police, social workers and leading national politicians that "street grooming," which happened in Rochdale, is largely dominated by Asian men. Ella Cockbain, a University College of London crime science specialist, says research shows that mostly Asian men make up the big groups of offenders who work together. She chooses her words carefully because the sample size is small and the topic sensitive." _
Christ alive! We know this to be probably ture. I'm just saying that all the suggested courses of action, but the idiotic US Right on this thread have been based on racism. Tar everyone with the same brush, throw them out of the country blah blah. It's not the facts of the matter, it's the idiotic racist responses.
x4 population, which would mean the UK problem would have to be 50,000 to compare. Which is irrelevant. I just want you to know that 200,000 under age girls are smuggled within your country each year. No doubt all by non-white men in your opinion - right?
Why must you equate resistance to the Left's hair-brained Muslim immigration schemes with racism? Islam is a culture/religion that doesn't play well with others. That's why they are currently at war with Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, and many other smaller religions around the globe. Can you accept criticism of the Left's immigration policy? _
We both know that the majority will not be white Americans. Often times, the Feds add Hispanics to the White crime stats to bump them up. _
You're right. Cultural differences mean the minority of the Asian population who have a desire to commit these kind of offences tend to do so in a different manner to the minority of Caucasian population who do. Cultural differences are probably a factor in there being proportional fewer Asian girls drunk on the streets at night to become victims too. I'm not how any of that justifies your obvious bigotry. Why do you hate the British?
So this one case is basically a soap box that you can use to espouse your racist views? Nice! And I could say the USA "doesn't play well with others. That's why they travelled to the other side of the world and are currently at war with Muslims".
I do not. Neither do you. But in your racist mind, white folks don't commit crime, this is the domain of non-whites. I'll wait for the numbers before judgement - how many of these 200,000 internal US trafficked kids were trafficked by whites and non-whites? I do not know. You assume.
Is this just one case? The USA isn't a religion. You can't even debate the point that Islam is a war with pretty much all of the other world religions. Name-calling isn't helping you to move the debate further. In fact, it shows a lack of intellectual vigor. _
Can we at least agree that because of immigration from places like Pakistan there are more crimes against women in Britain than there would have been otherwise?
That isn't what was said, so look it over again and please show me where I advocate the deportation of anything.
No, we can't, and neither can you, there are too many variables. This bait thread is simply a racist attempt to rake over the coals of case where the guilty were jailed last May.
Well, let me see, we had The Ripper, the Yorkshire Ripper, Ian Brady, Myra Hindley, George Chapman, Mary Anne Cotton. Hmmmm. There was John Duffy and David Mulcahy, The Sunderland Strangler, Colin Ireland (aka the gay slayer (you'd probably like that guy)), and a whole bunch of others. So can I say that the country was safer before Pakistani migrants arrived? No, I don't believe I can.
Liberals, for some reason, are pathologically incapable of admitting that sexual perversity and deviancy are norms in a large part of the Islamic world. Of course, they have no problem bashing Christians for any perceived extremism, but they trip over themselves to justify and rationalize the overt cultural backwardness of Muslim fundamentalists and extremists. Just another delightful and glaring leftist inconsistency...
A lot of this is rooted in the Islamic religion, as well. Infidelity is not tolerated in Islamic societies, yet Muhammad allowed his soldiers to take the wives and daughters of their defeated enemies as war booty. The men were allowed to have sex with these women without penalty. Muslims in Europe view European women the same way. Many Muslims see themselves as conquerors who are living in Europe to take over the continent via demographic warfare, so the women of the defeated Europeans are fair game.
We have a similar problem in Houston, which is the sex slavery capital of the US. Drug cartels and gangs either import or kidnap young girls to be sold into sex slavery. The imported females are usually from Cambodia, El Salvador, and Honduras and are promised jobs, only to be forced into sex slavery. The local drug gangs usually kidnap females to be used in such operations. The local government does nothing about it; basically they got the state to pass a law to regulate "massage parlors" in Harris and Montgomery Counties which do nothing at all.
One of the reasons (just one of the reasons, mind you) the muslims turn to white girls is that the muslim women are kept off limits, so to speak. With the burqas, threat of honour killings, and keeping the girls protected in the house. You know what I think? I believe the whole protection of women thing in muslim societies was a direct response to the actions of muslim men. Now I do not know if it is cultural, religious, genetic, or something else, but one thing for sure: Many of these men from Arab countries cannot seem to keep their uninvited hands off of women. I have read about Arab culture in books. It is commonly believed over there that if you leave a man and woman (who are not related) alone together in a room that you cannot be surprised if they engage in sex. This is very telling about their society. Now, many of you may just automatically assume this is just a silly Arab cultural belief, but what if it actually contains a big grain of truth? [video=youtube;XvNoOmSUHag]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvNoOmSUHag[/video]
That's because there is no evidence of them being norms in a large part of the Islamic world. The horrific crimes that triggered this thread were carried out by a tiny minority of the millions of Muslims living in the UK and there are horrific crimes committed by a similarly tiny minority of other nominal groupings of people. This pattern applies pretty much everywhere else. The problem here is human beings and one of the causal factors is the human tendency to fear (and therefore hate) other human beings they perceive as being different to themselves.
Uncle Ferd tried to warn ya'll dis was gonna happen... ... but ya'll wouldn't believe it... ... next thing ya know dey gonna be over here... ... rapin' alla white girls. Roughly a dozen cases of Asian Muslim men accused of grooming young white girls for sex are moving to trial across north England. Source