Undercover cops. Ethical? Wrong?

But only you can understand it because you refuse to use any sort of comprehensible language. You could change this but you are so tied up with your own ego you refuse.

 

what part of my simple concept is too difficult for you to understand; maybe we can start there.

 

You have not been able to actually demonstrate any concept at all.

1) You do not understand the principle of an argument

2) You use the most absurd language possible.

3) You use lanaguge you patently don;t understand -like 'fallacy'

 

Let's try it again;

Are police allowed to admit they lied to a civil Person in our economy in the conduct of their office of public Trust in our republic; as a civil privilege and immunity for those citizens in the several States.

What part of that is too difficult for you to understand in a competent manner?

 

And here we go again with your pretentious drivel about civil presons and 'in our economy, etc etc.

You habven;t a clue how to punctuate and just put it in without anything of use. lets try workinmg out exactly what you are trying to say


Are police seems Ok so far

Allowed to admit they lied Ok

to a civil Person Do You mean a civilian- if so why write a 'civil person' since civil person means a pelasant person

In our economy What are you on about?

in the conduct of their office of public Trust in our republic. This is quite absurd. what is an 'office of public trust in our republic?

as a civil privilege and immunity for those citizens in the several States. Again no idea what you are saying.

Why do you refuse to punctuate properly? What is with all tehse nonsensical pretentious terms?

 

If you admit they lied in their office of public trust under any authority arising from the United States, why shouldn't it be considered a privilege and immunity for the citizens in the several States?

 

Why shouldn't what be considered an immunity and a privelage?

 

Lying in any office of public trust, as that form of privilege and immunity for the citizens in the several States.

 

s that form of privilege and immunity for the citizens in the several States


makes absolutely no sense. Dump the pretentious language and stop just repeating yourself.

 

It is an important concept for the purposes of comity. What part do you not understand?

 

Its all nonsense. You refuse to use proper punctuation and your syntax makes things meaningless. You are not the slightes bit interest in comity. you are posing with idiotic lanaguge.

You are just trolling.

 

only trolls don't have a good argument.

 

I ahve no counter argument because I haven't a clue what you are asking.
Trolls often argue well. You are clearly just trying to constantly waste my time with your absurd phrasing and utter lack of meaningful punctuation. We asked if English was your native language and you refused to Answer

 

if you don't care enough about your Cause to find out, why troll?

 

I have tried to find out what you are talking about since you refuse to punctuate and actually communicate in any meaningful fashion.

I think you are doing it on purpose hence you are a troll.


1) IS English your first language

2) Why do you refuse to properly punctuate

 

why are these simple concepts so difficult for you to understand?

 

1) IS English your first language?

2) Why do you refuse to properly punctuate?

 

it may be a good thing i don't have to take you seriously at all, in legal venues.

 

1) IS English your first language?

2) Why do you refuse to properly punctuate?

 

nothing but fallacy for your Cause?

If you admit they lied in their office of public trust under any authority arising from the United States, why shouldn't it be considered a privilege and immunity for the citizens in the several States to the extent it is allowed in practice?

 

1) IS English your first language?

2) Why do you refuse to properly punctuate?

Easy questions but then you are a troll

 

Nice try, but this is the argument: If you admit they lied in their office of public trust under any authority arising from the United States, why shouldn't it be considered a privilege and immunity for the citizens in the several States to the extent it is allowed in practice?

Non sequiturs are usually considered fallacies; any questions?

 

1) IS English your first language?

2) Why do you refuse to properly punctuate?

Easy questions but then you are a troll

 

still nothing but diversion and that form of fallacy for your Cause?

 

Answer my questions and Ill address yours

1) IS English your first language?

2) Why do you refuse to properly punctuate?

Easy questions but then you are a troll