Up Close and Personal: Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

I think South Park already did that, only with a donkey. They were supposed to bite the persons wiener off too, instead of alter DNA.

So yes, that does seem logical. Also, I couldn't find it on youtube but I did find it on on their site. So it has to be true, it's in video form.

 

Funny how truthers believe the real world is like old mobster gang movies one sees on TV. Get real. What conspiracy mastermind would expose themselves with such a public scheme? You DO realize one of the goals of a conspiracy is to keep it all under wraps, right? Let me put it in terms you might be able to grasp. The mob boss isn't going to scare you in front of a stadium full of witnesses that could then testify against him. He is going to put a horse head in your bed so you get the message, and if that doesn't work, someone visits you in a dark alley where, once again, no witnesses will see what happens.

 

"Literally anyone who disagrees with me"

 

they are easy to spot.the ones that defend the fairy tales of the government to no end and lie and ignore evidence and facts that prove them wrong all the time are those people.which there are plenty of them here in this section that do just that.the ones that are just in denial,dont constantly come back here everyday and make fools of themselves all the time ignoring facts,they leave and stay a way a long time before coming back.

 

whats interesting about that is Clinton,the Bushs and Obama have all spoke about having a new world order which coincidentally is the same speech Hitler gave many times.the coincidence theorists of course will just call it that of course,another one of many bizarre coincidences not related.

 

Your supposition that the anthrax attacks are linked to the patriot act and 9/11 is based on the flimsiest of circumstantial evidence and is wholly speculative. You do realize that don't you? Whats more, the weaponization of anthrax is not necessarily all that complex. Any microbiology grad student could weaponize anthrax without to much trouble if given the right strain. The most difficult part of employing a biological weapon like anthrax is the means of delivery rather than the payload.

 

It might be more in the range of $300,000:

http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2010/261/532/2010-261532493-07c3d3aa-9.pdf

Lampooned here: http://la.indymedia.org/news/2012/05/253409.php

 

Rolling on the floor laughing. What you just said is imbecilic. You realize that don't you? Love how you disinfos take such an arrogant, authoritative tone to cover for your complete lack of sources and evidence.

Hey did you know you can also make military grade nanothermite just by dropping aluminum and steel from a great height?

 

This is a more accurately a description of fanatic "truthers" regaling this board with their so called "theories" .

 

Does anyone hear the wooshing sound I hear?

 

I love how you say it's imbecilic but put forth no effort in explaining why, providing sources to prove why, or even address the issue at all. Fine work.

 

I know his posts make me roll on the floor laughing as well like all of the official conspiracy theory apologists do.he always repetes the same thing over and over again when you have answered his questions thousands of times before and then acts like he never asked you the question before.Because of that,I added him to my list below.hee hee.

 

This post is the pot calling the kettle black.........hee hee

 

I think my irony meter just exploded.

 

I hear a giant sucking sound too.....

 

What exactly did i say that you find so imbecilic?

What is imbecilic is believing that the US and Russia are the only two countries that have weaponized anthrax. I have a Ph.D in micro/molecular biology and i can tell u with certainty that given the right strain of anthrax most any grad student could weaonize the strain in 12 to 18 months with the equipment available in a standard lab. In short, the weaponization process involves lyophilization/sonication of the spores and then incorporation of bentonite/silica to remove any remaining electrostatic charge. The greatest technological hurdle to effectively weaponize bacillus spores is developing a delivery system capable of delivering the spores in a pesistant aerosol optimized for effect. The reason you think im arrogant and authoritarian is because i am far more intelligent and knowledgable than you. Warmest regards, cooky

 

You have answered few if any of the many queries posed to you on this forum. Your posts consist of nothing more than rhetoric, hyperbole and dispersions. Its obscenely cowardly of you to ignore those who challenge your feeble opinions.

 

I would not discount the possibility that a bunch of white nationalist militia types could go from cooking crystal meth to weaponizing anthrax in a lab in the woods. They have the motivation and sometimes the finacial means to do so. There have been a couple cases of militia types being arrested posessing live spores.

 

On that basis alone, I would not hire little Dickie to built a single-car garage.

 

Would you mind sourcing that? All I've ever heard was that they passed around recipes at gun-shows they attended, or in similar locales that militia-types frequent.

And I'm asking because I don't know, but isn't any kind of disease difficult to handle, like, beyond the capabilities of meth makers? I thought there would be a realm of height between the two in terms of handling procedures and money for operating costs.

 

I've never read Gage, or the other one, Griffin, IIRC what his name is. Never read the lady's book(s) either. I probably won't. Don't have much of an interest to.



I'm more of in the middle (though I don't necessarily agree with everything the chart says), though blowback is an issue, which is stated quite clearly in bin Laden's two fatwas. He was obviously upset with us, and our policies, and our allegiances. I don't know anything about the remote-controlled theory. While I have felt and said that demolition was likely, I cannot prove it, there is no proof of it available (if there is proof), so I will not engage in those discussions, alas, because they are pointless, and, because the evidence before me more than suggests that demolition wasn't an active ingredient. 9/11 truth members from web communities like September Clues and Let's Roll - I don't know if they purposely spread false information, but what they spread is clearly false information, "information" that is not acceptable. They say, maybe not jointly, but nevertheless, say that there were no victims, that they were faked (simmed IIRC), that there were no planes, that the towers were hollow, that the smoke we all saw was smoke-machine generated, and among other things, that the phone calls were faked too (because there were no victims to make them) but were made with voice morphs.

When someone goes "to the right" on that picture, I turn the volume down. Same as when someone goes "to the left." The lady is definitely far-right. But Gage and Griffin strike me as propagandists - if they can get their fingernails up and under something, they'll shill it (in the selling sense) since they know they can use their words to exploit the fears, uncertainties, the mentally challenged, and whatever other kind of type that buy books from men like them.

 

My osition is that it was blowback from our Middle East policies since the creation of Saudi Arabia, aggravated by our actions since 1947. On top of that , Bush the Lesser was an utter yutz and not up to his job. He was also surrounded by incompetent boobs who thought that knowing how to run a business qualified them to run a government.

I can understand how some dimbulbs would find that too scarey to contemplate and would rather take shelter in thinking that we could defend ourselves if we had to, and that only we had the power to do that to us.

 

"best evidence proven beyond reasonable doubt".. yet straight off the top of my head I can see 8 out of 10 of their points are completely and utterly false. The remote control column under "probably true" made me sniger.. what total aviation ignorant buffoon came up with that one

 

Jayhan?

 

As I said, "I don't necessarily agree with everything the chart says." However, since you disagree with 80% of the middle section, would you mind elaborating on those beliefs/providing evidence to back your opinion?

Welcome to the board, and the 9/11 section, by the way.