If you read anything at all, just make sure it's the Time Magazine article down at the bottom. It's pretty shocking, even for me. One of the worst mass murderers of the 20th century is described as "moderate" by the media simply because he followed orders: The New York Times gushes: In the words of the C.I.A. study on the post-coup massacres in Indonesia: The U.S. embassy's attitude [towards these killings] was clearly expressed when, almost a month after the mass killings had begun, Francis Galbraith, the deputy chief of mission (later to succeed Marshall Green as ambassador), reporting to Washington on his conversation with a high-ranking Indonesian army officer, said that he had "made clear" to him that: The White House also authorized the CIA station in Bangkok to provide small arms to General Sukendro in order to: For a rare investigative report on U.S. involvement in the Indonesia coup: For the articles describing the "welcome developments" in Indonesia, see James Reston, "Washington: A Gleam of Light in Asia," New York Times, June 19, 1966, p. E12; Robert P. Martin, "Indonesia: Hope . . . Where Once There Was None," U.S. News and World Report, June 6, 1966, p. 70: Similarly, in a cover story Time magazine celebrated "The West's best news for years in Asia":
The lack of views of this thread means very few people even know who Suharto is, which only helps prove my point.