Vaccine holocaust is well underway with globalists at war with 7.8 billion people

The generic spam statement! A layman you say, but one who is somehow able to establish cause and correlation to what you "see happening"? That is just ridiculous.

MEH! Another spam statement. Well you need some to understand it isn't blowing in one direction everywhere! Or that the local area you can test with a wet finger doesn't mean the whole world is doing that, or even the whole street! If you don't understand a subject you don't understand why bullshit claims are bullshit. If every source you surround yourself with is related to batshit, that will be what you "see happening". If every informed consensus is ignored because of some absurd confirmation bias then you will NEVER get a balanced understanding.

@Scott Why should anyone respond to you when you ignore every single reply!?

@Scott You make bold claims about "scientific method"! Where is yours? This pathetic "people tell me" crap is clearly fake.

Who tells you their blood was polluted by vaccines? Who do you know who got "bells palsy" directly after a vaccine!? I know of nobody who has had less than mild reactions to the needle with sore arm and mild flu symptoms! I know of nobody who knows somebody with anything more than this!

Answer the above, a genuine truth-seeker who used the "scientific method" would not avoid inconvenient observations!

 

Thanks for that Scott. That's the first testimony I've seen from one transfused with poison blood. My bet is that it's happened many thousands of times. Crimes against humanity documented.

 

As a "truther" what steps have you taken to verify any of it? My bet is absolutely nothing.

Thanks for heroically bumping his post, away from my slam dunk response that you failed to address. Sadly, betting on things you know nothing about is inadvisable.

Nope. Just batshit.

 

Start watching this video at the 35:20 time mark.

SHOT DEAD: The COVID Jab Documentary They Don’t Want You To See [FULL VIDEO]
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video...mentary-they-dont-want-you-to-see-full-video/

A doctor says that a sudden increase in stillbirths coincided with the vaccine rollout. He says there was no increase in the stillbirth rate during 2020 when there was covid before the vaccine rollout.

 

Casual observers are wondering why this "Scott" person keeps dumping batshit on this forum and then evading every single reply. This person constantly goes on about "debate halls" and the "scientific method" yet clearly has no knowledge of either!

 

The video in my last post has some excerpts from this video.

Dr. Peter MCullough FULL Shot Dead Interview, Never Before Seen Comments | Teryn Gregson Ep 137
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video...-137/?utm_source=daily-email&utm_medium=email

This doctor explains the symptoms of covid in unvaxxed people and the symptoms of both covid and the vaccine in vaxxed people.

There's a lot of advertising in the video so to avoid it, start watching at the 3:50 time mark. When the advertising starts again, skip to the 15:14 time mark, then these time marks: 26:30, 14:55.


Here's a related article.

Long COVID Propaganda and Fraud: It’s Time to Push Back on Lies and Help Those Suffering from Spikeopathy
https://www.globalresearch.ca/long-...lies-help-those-suffering-spikeopathy/5841248

 

Here's a doctor showing that an increase in all-cause mortality coincided with the vaccine rollout.

Dr. Denis Rancourt Unveiling All-Cause Mortality: A Critical Analysis of the Pandemic Declaration and Vaccination Rollout | Ottawa Day One | NCI
https://rumble.com/v2ohtte-physicis...s-his-findings-on-all-cause-mortality-ot.html


Be sure to check out the comment section.

 

The relentless "see batshit post batshit" continues with absolutely no reply to rebuttal.
1. Who proved the source had been vaccinated? Certainly not that disinformation video and even more certainly not you.
2. Who proved the blood transfusion caused the palsy? Certainly not that disinformation video and even more certainly not you.
3. Who verified it to be genuine, giving names etc.? Certainly not that disinformation video and even more certainly not you.
4. Who disproved that in this "genuine" video the donor was from a person who had Covid antibodies? Certainly not that disinformation video and even more certainly not you.
5. Who proved anything whatsoever? Certainly not that disinformation video and even more certainly not you.

He looked like an antivaxxer faking his symptoms! Bells palsy is extremely rare even as a side-effect, this is just total lies.

Blood Transfusion Doesn't Transfer COVID-19 Vaccine - FactCheck.org
"Within days of vaccination, Silverstein said, “there’s no trace of any of the mRNA in the blood.”
“If an unvaccinated person gets a blood transfusion from a vaccinated donor, the unvaccinated person does not become vaccinated,” Malia Jones, a public health researcher, explained in a post in March.
“A vaccine contains extremely small amounts of both active & inactive ingredients which never enter our bloodstream in the same way as other medications like pain relievers, antibiotics, or antidepressants,” she wrote. “All the action comes from your own immune system.”
So there’s no cause for concern about getting a blood transfusion from a vaccinated donor. As Silverstein pointed out, blood from vaccinated donors has been in the supply for almost two years with no health issues."

@Scott Why should anyone respond to you when you ignore every single reply!?

 

Idaho Doctor Makes Baseless Claims About Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines - FactCheck.org
"To those bogus claims, Cole has now added: “mRNA trials in mammals have led to odd cancers. mRNA trials on mammals have led to autoimmune diseases — not right away, six, nine, 12 months later.”

We asked Cole to provide support for those claims, and he referred us to a 2018 paper published in the journal Nature Reviews Drug Discovery that reviewed trials and studies of various, earlier mRNA vaccines.

But that paper doesn’t support his statement.

Norbert Pardi, a research assistant professor of medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, was the lead author of the paper. He told us in an email, “No publications demonstrate that mRNA vaccines cause cancer or autoimmune diseases.”

Pardi’s 19-page paper does make one passing reference to autoimmune diseases, which is what Cole highlighted to us.

The paper says: “A possible concern could be that some mRNA-based vaccine platforms induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity. Thus, identification of individuals at an increased risk of autoimmune reactions before mRNA vaccination may allow reasonable precautions to be taken.”

But, Pardi explained, he and the other researchers included that passage because they wanted to note some potential concerns. However, he emphasized that “no scientific evidence has confirmed that these concerns are real.”

It’s also worth noting that the paper predated the COVID-19 pandemic by two years, so it doesn’t include any information specifically about the COVID-19 vaccines.

Simply put, “there is no scientific evidence that shows that mRNA vaccines cause autoimmune diseases,” Pardi said. “Multiple clinical trials have been performed with mRNA vaccines in the past 10 years and none of them found that mRNA vaccination caused autoimmune diseases. Further, we are not aware of any studies showing an autoimmune disease appearing many months after vaccination as Dr. Cole inaccurately suggests.”

Likewise, Dr. Roger Shapiro, associate professor of immunology and infectious diseases at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health, told us in an email that he was unaware of any study that would support Cole’s claim that the vaccines are carcinogenic.

“There is nothing in the science of mRNA vaccines that would suggest carcinogenicity, and they have been tested in humans for other diseases before COVID-19,” Shapiro said. “mRNA rapidly breaks down in the body, and probably does not last long enough to act as a carcinogen.”

“Regarding autoimmunity,” he said, “this is always a concern with any medical product, but there is no evidence to date suggesting it, and it does not seem any more likely than with other vaccines. mRNA is made all the time in our bodies, and delivering it by vaccine should not be different.”

Dr. Dean Winslow, an infectious disease physician at Stanford Health Care, concurred with the other experts with whom we spoke. In a phone interview, he characterized Cole’s claims about cancer as “fearmongering” and said, “There’s just no scientific basis for that.”

“We’re talking about these very small fragments of messenger RNA that don’t hang around for long at all,” he said, noting that the mRNA vaccines have been in use for almost six months and have been “very safe, very well-tolerated vaccines.”

Winslow recognized that some people are concerned that the mRNA from the vaccine might persist in their bodies and somehow change their genetics or cause long-term effects. So he emphasized that the vaccines have small fragments of RNA, which survive only briefly and carry information about the virus that causes COVID-19.

Similarly, Pardi told us, “COVID-19 mRNA vaccines do not alter our DNA and they get rapidly degraded so they do not promote cancer formation.”



@Scott Why should anyone respond to you when you ignore every single reply!?

Where is your "debate-hall" activity or your "scientific-method"?

 

I've already told you that I'm just a layman and what I see happening around me is consistent with what those doctors and researchers say and not consistent with what the mainstream media say. Being a layman that's about as far as I can go. Don't bother with me. Just address the info I post. The viewers can look at the info and your analyses of it and do their own research and come to their own conclusions. I'm really irrelevant here. You're putting far too much importance on me.

 

I don't. I bother with the incessant batshit you post.

Correct, which is why I address what you post.

I'm putting none on you or what you post. My responses dismantle your claims in every instance and you simply ignore them.

On a substantial number of posts, you have cited the "scientific method", which you appear to be completely bypassing. Your whole case revolves around "what you see happening" when you pretty much ignore EVERYTHING that doesn't reinforce a conspiracy of some sort! Probably over a hundred times or more you quote a phrase about others "being laughed out of the debating hall" yet for an unbelievable number of times you point blank refuse to respond to ANY rebuttal. I can't count the number of times you have spammed the "Black Knight" video, yet your very action suggests you have modelled your belief system on that character.

Why should anyone respond to you when you ignore every single reply!? Where is your "debate-hall" activity or your "scientific-method"?
What is your goal here? Is it to convince others of your views when you are a layman and make no effort to verify anything? What are you even trying to do?

 

(from post #253)

Here are some videos of experts saying that the evidence seems to show that the excess deaths in Australia are being caused by the covid vaccine.

TOO MANY DEAD
AN INQUIRY INTO AUSTRALIA'S EXCESS MORTALITY
https://amps.redunion.com.au/too-many-dead

 

What did they say, what method did they use for causation and correlation? Did you check their credentials, or did you just assume they were "experts"!?

Still waiting for a response on this!

 

This guy explains how he thinks vaccine-related deaths are counted as covid deaths.

Evidence: How CDC Buried Vaccine Death Data
https://www.theepochtimes.com/epoch...eRUWijlw7wGVAzyOn9gV66z2OJeSpP4NV2jtR3O9obeI5

 

"Today on Frontline Health we interview John Beaudoin, an electrical engineer"

Do you think he has the least bit of qualification here?!

 

World population as of Jan. 1, 2024 is over 8 billion, so the "holocaust" was not very effective.

Well, that didn't line up too well with reality.

 

Why don't you address what he says?

 

Why don't you address a single response!


Do you think he has the least bit of qualification here?!

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...billion-people.590753/page-12#post-1074611780

 

OK. So he's taken VAERS reports and looked to see if there is anything linking them to subsequent death certificates. When he was explaining what he did, my immediate thought was, "you're guessing". Basically that is what he has done. Now, no matter how informed a guess you think he has made there are a number of key issues.

Well, we're back to that old correlation/causation thing! Let's say for arguments sake that poor little 7 year old died as he suggested, 7 days after the vaccine. WHERE is his data that the child had not had a recent bout of covid-19, was not having a current bout, but was asymptomatic or had had previous adverse reactions to hypodermic syringes? It's very well known that having a vaccine during an infection is not advisable. Where is the family medical history?

He's not experienced enough to understand those risks or how to apply them. People DO get these illnesses without an injection, they absolutely do. Statistically it is inevitable that there will be instances of illness close to a vaccination.

Myths and Facts about COVID-19 Vaccines | CDC
"FACT: Anyone can report events to VAERS, even if it is not clear whether a vaccine caused the problem. Because of this, VAERS data alone cannot determine if the reported adverse event was caused by a COVID-19 vaccination. Some VAERS reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Vaccine safety experts study these adverse events and look for unusually high numbers of health problems, or a pattern of problems, after people receive a particular vaccine. The number of deaths reported to VAERS following COVID-19 vaccination has been misinterpreted and misreported as if this number means deaths that were proven to be caused by vaccination. Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem."

 

This video is just a general summery of what the anti-vaccine camp thinks is happening.

Crimes Against Humanity - True Stories from COVID
https://www.brighteon.com/8f237234-0e42-42ba-b10e-47561e747118


The pro-vaccine posters can give their analyses of it and the viewers can come to their own conclusions.

 

Why do "truth seekers" (meh!) do this. Across every one of these crazy, unquantified batshit conspiracies, rebuttal is consistently ignored.

The objective cannot possibly be the seeking of any truth. That requires, ironically, being honest enough to assimilate inconvenient responses.

 

Phizers X-vice president admits everything was lies HERE

 

Deliberate misinformation. And "twitter!?
The ex-Pfizer scientist who became an anti-vax hero. (reuters.com)
"In recent months, Yeadon (pronounced Yee-don) has emerged as an unlikely hero of the so-called anti-vaxxers, whose adherents question the safety of many vaccines, including for the coronavirus. The anti-vaxxer movement has amplified Yeadon’s skeptical views about COVID-19 vaccines and tests, government-mandated lockdowns and the arc of the pandemic. Yeadon has said he personally doesn’t oppose the use of all vaccines. But many health experts and government officials worry that opinions like his fuel vaccine hesitancy – a reluctance or refusal to be vaccinated – that could prolong the pandemic. COVID-19 has already killed more than 2.6 million people worldwide.

“These claims are false, dangerous and deeply irresponsible,” said a spokesman for Britain’s Department of Health & Social Care, when asked about Yeadon’s views. “COVID-19 vaccines are the best way to protect people from coronavirus and will save thousands of lives.”"

 

The above is disinfo!
Meantime Britain completely shuts down covid vax for anyone under 12 and Parliament is looking for someone to sue for all the vax damages!

 

I'm sure that looked good when you typed it. It's just meaningless drivel.