Vehicles - the new Muslim weapon of choice?

Why can't they just ignore the parts of the Quran they don't like, like you do with science?

- - - Updated - - -

Wait, so you are saying every Muslim follows every word of the Quran? Does every Muslim beat his wife?

 

If they don't like parts of it they are saying that their god is not all-knowing, that he got those parts wrong - that gets the death penalty in Islam (because it's such a barbaric belief system) - followed by many people who are quite barbaric as well (no surprise.) I love Muslims, and have a better belief system for them.

 

Just like how if you don't believe psychology when it defines what a delusion is, you are saying all science is false.

Are you going to claim all Muslims follow the Quran perfectly and that every Muslim that doesn't gets the death penalty?

 

I learned all I need to know about Islam on 9/11.

I have zero sympathy for them, they get what they get.

 

Did you learn all you needed to know about Christianity from the Holocaust?

 

What you need to do my friend is ask Muslims (online probably) this question: "Which parts of the Qur'an are wrong? One example: is Q4:34 wrong when it says it's a good thing to beat one's wife?"

It will open your eyes - they are so unbelievably immoral that they will defend, yes, completely defend, an incredible number of incredibly immoral things.

 

Wrong by what standard? There are parts of Harry Potter that are wrong by my standard and I would absolutely object to them being forced on anyone against their will.

You do know that Islam has a spectrum of how faithful its followers are right? That they are millions of people in the world that would be called "casual Muslims" at best, right?

Your contention that all of Islam is the monolithic body of fanatics who utterly and without reservation believe and follow every word of the Koran is a false concept. It is also VEHEMENTLY ANTI-HUMANIST.

 

Personally, I cant wait for self driving cars. 1) it would make my time on the road much more useful, 2) the elderly can get to the store and doctors much easier, 3) they make the roads much safer, 4) DUI becomes obsolete (a boon for bars), 5)traffic issues are much less, and 6) it will be a bull market for the auto and tech sectors.

 

Mohammad said to kill those who leave Islam - and any Muslim, who won't condemn Mohammad (in no uncertain terms) for this barbarity can not be considered a moral person as most ethical Modern Secular Humanists. It would be like a Nazi refusing to condemn Hitler for saying to kill all those who leave Nazism.

 

So does every Muslim kill people who leave Islam?

 

Why do you think your time on the road needs to be "useful"? Put on some nice talk or music and enjoy the freaking ride. You don't need to be "useful" every minute of every day.

And an automatic driver is probably going to perform worse overall than human drivers. AI is too stupid to handle driving.

And I don't care what it means for the damned stock market. I hate the stock market, frankly. It's a bunch of jerks enriching themselves at the expense of working people.

 

And also enriching the 401k's of millions of working people. Where do you think retirement plan investments go?

 

yes, very useful as my time is money. do you have any data that shows the AI is less safe than humans, id like to see that. And the market is open to all to enrich themselves....

 

It's important to note that the holocaust was racially driven, whereas 9/11 is theologically motivated. Their (Islamists) efforts to kill us (Infidels) has not yet ended, whereas there are no Nazi's still killing Jews.

6 years of christian academy taught me all I needed to know about christianity. More than enough, thanks.

 

Are you really going to argue anti-semites, especially German anti-semites, did not use Christianity as justification?

Why do Christians get a pass for murdering millions, but all 1 billion plus Muslims are on the hook for a dozen guys killing 3,000?

 

ENOUGH WANT TO, ENOUGH think that Mohammad was not wrong to say that, to make Islam immoral. In fact, ENOUGH believe that that it's been punishable by death in many countries over the last 1400 or so years. That's barbaric to Modern Secular Humanists who believe more in freedom more than that.

NOT all Polar Bears will kill you (did you see that one Polar Bear who was literally petting that sled dog - kinda cool!), but ENOUGH Polar Bears will kill you to try to do just about every thing you can to avoid Polar Bears! See, life is not an all-or-nothing proposition, my Islamic friend.

- - - Updated - - -

We agree!!!

 

Because Muslims are emulating the life of the central prophet of their religion, who is believed to be sinless in the eyes of God. He murdered thousands of people. Beheaded between 600 and 900 in a single day. Jesus never did that. Your comparison is false.

 

1. So when atheist communists were mass murdering people all over the world, you would have supported discriminatory restrictive policies against all atheists in America, even though atheists like Modern Secular Humanists don't believe in mass murder?

Why are you so insistent that whole groups bear the responsibility for the crimes of people they don't even agree with?

2. NO WE DONT!

Because unlike you, I don't believe EITHER GROUP should be on the hook for the atrocities of its extremist minorities.

- - - Updated - - -

God, who is Jesus, ordered the murder of the Amelekite children and killed every first born child in egypt.

 

Then great news: I have a country for you to move to! The long-time former leader (named "Fidel") just died, but his brother still runs the place - you'll love it! A "worker's paradise"! You'll earn, like, $20 per month!! So in 1200 years you can afford that new car you've always wanted! Pack your bags!

PS don't plan on ever leaving that country though, because like the Hotel California, "you can check out, but you can never leave". That's because they're kinda insecure about their system, and if they DID let people leave then no one would be left, probably.

- - - Updated - - -

It appears that we can't seem to agree who is more barbaric, Jesus or Mohammad. I'm going to call it a tie.

 

Jesus' example is who Christians are taught to follow. Not the God of the Old Testament. You clearly don't understand the ideology you are criticizing.

 

So like me, you condemn Jesus, in no uncertain terms, for that atrocity, right, Q?

 

Who did Jesus kill, personally?

 

In other word's that's because his dad was such a scumbag that they don't want to follow him. If my dad was the same as Jesus' dad I wouldn't want to follow him either!!

 

Nah, Muhammad is far worse. Islam is far worse. It's pretty obvious which one is causing more problems at the moment. If Muslims weren't minorities and didn't vote left-wing Democrat, the left wouldn't be defending Islam like they do.

 

So you are backing down from you claim Jesus didn't kill anyone? Because according to Christians, Jesus is God and God killed plenty of people and ordered the deaths of plenty of there.

- - - Updated - - -

I don't believe Jesus is God. Personally, I don't even believe Jesus existed.